Kurtuldu E, Alkis H T, Yesiltepe S, Sumbullu M A
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Zip 34010, İstanbul, Turkey.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Dumlupinar Avenue, Zip 07058, Campus, Antalya, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;23(3):329-336. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_309_19.
The aim of this study is to determine the type, frequency, and location of incidental findings in the maxillofacial region in patients undergoing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan for implant treatment..
In this study, 300 patients who underwent CBCT imaging for implant treatment planning were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in four different categories, namely, maxillary sinus pathologies, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) findings, dentoalveolar findings, and soft-tissue calcifications. In maxillary sinus pathologies, we categorized patients by mucosal thickening, polypoidal lesion, air-liquid level, total opacification, oroantral fistula, periapical lesion related with maxillary sinus, antrolith, hypoplasia, and foreign body presence. In the TMJ findings category, we evaluated patients for erosion, osteophyte, sclerosis, flattening, and bifid condyle. For dentoalveolar findings, we looked for the residual root and impacted tooth. In soft-tissue calcifications, we examined patients for tonsillolith, sialolith, lymph node calcification, styloid ligament calcification, carotid artery calcifications, and osteoma cutis.
Mucosal thickening was mostly seen in maxillary sinus pathology. One hundred and forty-eight (49.3%) of the patients had at least one TMJ incidental finding. We detected at least one impacted tooth in 17 (5.7%) patients' maxilla and 14 (4.7%) patients' mandibles. The most frequently seen calcification was styloid ligament calcification. There was no statistically significant relationship between the age groups and incidental findings (P > 0.05).
Oral radiologists should be aware of incidental findings and evaluate the possibilities of underlying diseases in a comprehensive way, and if there is a concern about the finding, they should refer the patient to the relevant specialist.
本研究旨在确定接受锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)以进行种植治疗的患者颌面部区域偶然发现的类型、频率和位置。
本研究对300例接受CBCT成像以进行种植治疗计划的患者进行回顾性评估。患者被分为四个不同类别,即上颌窦病变、颞下颌关节(TMJ)发现、牙槽骨发现和软组织钙化。在上颌窦病变中,我们根据黏膜增厚、息肉样病变、气液平面、完全混浊、口腔上颌窦瘘、与上颌窦相关的根尖病变、上颌窦结石、发育不全和异物存在对患者进行分类。在颞下颌关节发现类别中,我们评估患者是否有侵蚀、骨赘、硬化、扁平以及髁突分叉。对于牙槽骨发现,我们寻找残根和阻生牙。在软组织钙化方面,我们检查患者是否有扁桃体结石、涎石、淋巴结钙化、茎突韧带钙化、颈动脉钙化和皮肤骨瘤。
黏膜增厚在上颌窦病变中最为常见。148例(49.3%)患者至少有一项颞下颌关节偶然发现。我们在17例(5.7%)患者的上颌骨和14例(4.7%)患者的下颌骨中检测到至少一颗阻生牙。最常见的钙化是茎突韧带钙化。年龄组与偶然发现之间无统计学显著关系(P>0.05)。
口腔放射科医生应意识到偶然发现,并全面评估潜在疾病的可能性,如果对发现存在疑虑,应将患者转诊至相关专科医生。