Keles A, Ors S Askerbeyli, Yilmaz Z
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;23(3):381-385. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_527_19.
This study aimed to compare the effect of different solutions on the removal of orange-brown precipitate with or without ultrasonic activation.
One hundred and twenty extracted maxillary anterior teeth were instrumented. In experimental groups (n = 10), canals were flushed with 17% EDTA, 10% citric acid, 1% phytic acid, 96% alcohol and distilled water either using syringe irrigation or ultrasonic activation, after creating orange-brown precipitate. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to stereomicroscopic analysis. The amount of precipitate was scored and the data were analyzed (P = 0.05).
There were no differences detected among the tested solutions (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between ultrasonically activated irrigation and syringe irrigation for EDTA and distilled water in coronal, middle portions (P < 0.05).
Ultrasonic activation significantly improved the precipitate removal capacity of EDTA and DW. Tested solutions were similarly effective regarding the removal of the precipitate.
本研究旨在比较不同溶液在有无超声激活情况下对去除橙褐色沉淀的效果。
选取120颗拔除的上颌前牙进行预备。在实验组(n = 10)中,在形成橙褐色沉淀后,使用注射器冲洗或超声激活,用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、10%柠檬酸、1%植酸、96%乙醇和蒸馏水冲洗根管。将牙齿纵向切开并进行体视显微镜分析。对沉淀量进行评分并分析数据(P = 0.05)。
在所测试的溶液之间未检测到差异(P > 0.05)。在冠部、中部,EDTA和蒸馏水的超声激活冲洗与注射器冲洗之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
超声激活显著提高了EDTA和蒸馏水去除沉淀的能力。在所测试的溶液中,对于去除沉淀的效果相似。