Suppr超能文献

根据妊娠期糖尿病的定义的妊娠结局。

Pregnancy outcomes according to the definition of gestational diabetes.

机构信息

PEDEGO Research Unit, MRC Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and the University of Oulu, Finland.

Public Health Promotion Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki and Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0229496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229496. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) defined by the criteria according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diagnostic criteria for GDM.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Six secondary and tertiary delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009.

POPULATION

Pregnant women (N = 4,033) and their offspring.

METHODS

We used data on comprehensive screening of pregnant women with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), performed between gestational weeks 24 and 40. OGTT glucose concentrations were used to identify women who fulfilled IADPSG and NICE criteria. While cut-offs according to Finnish national criteria partly overlapped with both criteria, a subgroup of IADPSG- or NICE-positive GDM women remained undiagnosed by Finnish criteria and hence non-treated. They were analysed as subgroups and compared to controls who were negative with all cut-offs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GDM prevalence, birth weight SD score (BWSDS), large for gestational age (LGA) and caesarean section (CS) rates.

RESULTS

Among the 4,033 women screened for GDM, 1,249 (31.0%) and 529 (13.1%) had GDM according to the IADPSG and NICE criteria, respectively. The LGA rate was similar in both groups. Regardless of the diagnostic criteria, women with GDM had a higher risk of induced delivery and CSs than controls. In IADPSG-positive non-treated women, offspring's BWSDS and CS rate were higher than in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

GDM prevalence was 2.4-fold higher according to the IADPSG compared with the NICE criteria but the LGA rate did not differ. BWSDS and CS rate were increased already with mild untreated hyperglycaemia.

摘要

目的

评估根据国际妊娠糖尿病研究组(IADPSG)和英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的 GDM 诊断标准定义的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的频率和围产结局。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

芬兰六家二级和三级分娩医院,于 2009 年开展。

人群

孕妇(N=4033)及其后代。

方法

我们使用了在妊娠 24 至 40 周期间进行的 2 小时 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)全面筛查孕妇的数据。OGTT 葡萄糖浓度用于确定符合 IADPSG 和 NICE 标准的女性。虽然芬兰国家标准的切点与两种标准部分重叠,但部分 IADPSG 或 NICE 阳性 GDM 妇女仍未被芬兰标准诊断为未治疗的 GDM。将其作为亚组进行分析,并与所有切点均为阴性的对照组进行比较。

主要观察指标

GDM 患病率、出生体重标准差评分(BWSDS)、巨大儿(LGA)和剖宫产(CS)率。

结果

在筛查 GDM 的 4033 名女性中,根据 IADPSG 和 NICE 标准,分别有 1249 名(31.0%)和 529 名(13.1%)患有 GDM。两组的 LGA 发生率相似。无论诊断标准如何,患有 GDM 的女性与对照组相比,引产和 CS 的风险更高。在 IADPSG 阳性未治疗的女性中,其后代的 BWSDS 和 CS 率高于对照组。

结论

与 NICE 标准相比,根据 IADPSG 标准,GDM 的患病率增加了两倍,但 LGA 率没有差异。即使是轻度未治疗的高血糖,也会增加 BWSDS 和 CS 率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8368/7058278/cc9a6db8e5e4/pone.0229496.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验