Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0229989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229989. eCollection 2020.
Snakebite envenoming is a major global health problem that kills or disables half a million people in the world's poorest countries. Biting snake identification is key to understanding snakebite eco-epidemiology and optimizing its clinical management. The role of snakebite victims and healthcare providers in biting snake identification has not been studied globally.
This scoping review aims to identify and characterize the practices in biting snake identification across the globe.
Epidemiological studies of snakebite in humans that provide information on biting snake identification were systematically searched in Web of Science and Pubmed from inception to 2nd February 2019. This search was further extended by snowball search, hand searching literature reviews, and using Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers screened publications and charted the data.
We analysed 150 publications reporting 33,827 snakebite cases across 35 countries. On average 70% of victims/bystanders spotted the snake responsible for the bite and 38% captured/killed it and brought it to the healthcare facility. This practice occurred in 30 countries with both fast-moving, active-foraging as well as more secretive snake species. Methods for identifying biting snakes included snake body examination, victim/bystander biting snake description, interpretation of clinical features, and laboratory tests. In nine publications, a picture of the biting snake was taken and examined by snake experts. Snakes were identified at the species/genus level in only 18,065/33,827 (53%) snakebite cases. 106 misidentifications led to inadequate victim management. The 8,885 biting snakes captured and identified were from 149 species including 71 (48%) non-venomous species.
Snakebite victims and healthcare providers can play a central role in biting snake identification and novel approaches (e.g. photographing the snake, crowdsourcing) could help increase biting snake taxonomy collection to better understand snake ecology and snakebite epidemiology and ultimately improve snakebite management.
蛇伤中毒是一个全球性的重大健康问题,每年在世界上最贫穷的国家导致 50 多万人死亡或残疾。确定咬伤人的蛇的种类是了解蛇伤生态流行病学和优化其临床管理的关键。全球范围内尚未研究过蛇伤受害者和医疗保健提供者在确定咬伤人的蛇的种类方面所起的作用。
本范围界定综述旨在确定和描述全球范围内确定咬伤人的蛇的种类的做法。
从 Web of Science 和 Pubmed 数据库中系统地检索了自成立以来至 2019 年 2 月 2 日发表的关于人类蛇伤的流行病学研究,这些研究提供了有关确定咬伤人的蛇的种类的信息。通过滚雪球搜索、手工检索文献综述以及使用 Google Scholar 进一步扩展了该搜索。两名独立的审查员筛选出版物并记录数据。
我们分析了 150 篇报告了 33827 例蛇伤病例的出版物,这些病例来自 35 个国家。平均有 70%的受害者/旁观者发现了导致咬伤的蛇,38%的人捕获/杀死了蛇并将其带到医疗保健机构。这种做法发生在 30 个国家,涉及快速移动、积极觅食的蛇以及更隐秘的蛇种。识别咬人的蛇的方法包括蛇体检查、受害者/旁观者描述咬人的蛇、解释临床特征和实验室检查。在 9 篇出版物中,咬人的蛇的照片由蛇类专家进行了检查。只有 18065/33827(53%)例蛇伤病例能确定咬伤蛇的种类到种/属水平。106 次错误识别导致了对受害者的处理不当。捕获并确定的 8885 条咬伤蛇来自 149 个物种,包括 71 种(48%)无毒蛇。
蛇伤受害者和医疗保健提供者可以在确定咬伤人的蛇的种类方面发挥核心作用,新方法(如拍摄蛇的照片、众包)可以帮助增加咬伤人的蛇的分类收集,以更好地了解蛇的生态学和蛇伤流行病学,并最终改善蛇伤管理。