• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续气道正压通气与高流量鼻导管吸氧用于经口喂养早产儿(CHOmP)的比较:随机先导研究。

Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(5):951-957. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1735339. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2020.1735339
PMID:32138561
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of conducting a study comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or heated, humidified, high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) on oral feeding in preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled pilot study in a level III NICU, of infants' born ≤28°weeks who at 34°weeks post menstrual age (PMA) were dependent on noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Infants were randomized evenly to nCPAP or HHHFNC groups and orally fed on low-flow oxygen. The primary outcomes of enrollment and retention were assessed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 40 infants and 12 completed the study in the nCPAP group versus 13 in the HHHFNC group. Using our respiratory and feeding protocols, we showed overall enrollment and retention rates (95%CI) at 0.66 (0.54, 0.77) and 0.63 (0.48, 0.78), respectively. Breastfeeding rates were 82% in the nCPAP group and 76% in the HHHFNC group. Infants in the HHHFNC group reached full feeds 7 days earlier than those in the nCPAP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our retention rate, an adequately powered randomized controlled trial can be performed to confirm or refute that HHHFNC is associated with achieving oral feeds earlier.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

United States National Library of Medicine (www.clinicaltrials.gov) Identifier: NCT02055339. First posted 2/5/2014.

摘要

目的

评估比较经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)或加热、湿化、高流量鼻导管(HHHFNC)对早产儿经口喂养的可行性。

研究设计

在三级 NICU 中进行的随机对照试验,研究对象为出生胎龄≤28 周且在 34 周月经龄(PMA)时依赖无创通气(NIV)的婴儿。婴儿随机平均分为 nCPAP 组或 HHHFNC 组,在低流量氧气下经口喂养。评估了入组和保留的主要结果。

结果

我们共纳入了 40 名婴儿,其中 nCPAP 组有 12 名婴儿完成了研究,而 HHHFNC 组有 13 名婴儿完成了研究。使用我们的呼吸和喂养方案,我们得出了总的入组和保留率(95%CI)分别为 0.66(0.54,0.77)和 0.63(0.48,0.78)。nCPAP 组母乳喂养率为 82%,HHHFNC 组为 76%。HHHFNC 组的婴儿比 nCPAP 组更早达到全量喂养。

结论

基于我们的保留率,可以进行一项足够有力的随机对照试验,以确认或反驳 HHHFNC 与更早实现经口喂养相关。

试验注册

美国国立医学图书馆(www.clinicaltrials.gov)标识符:NCT02055339。首次发布日期为 2014 年 2 月 5 日。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study.持续气道正压通气与高流量鼻导管吸氧用于经口喂养早产儿(CHOmP)的比较:随机先导研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(5):951-957. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1735339. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The ENTARES Randomized Clinical Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与加热湿化高流量鼻导管通气对呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿喂养不耐受的影响:ENTARES 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23052.
3
Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Post-extubation Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.加热湿化高流量鼻导管与鼻塞持续气道正压通气用于早产儿拔管后呼吸支持的随机对照试验。
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Jan 29;67(1). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa082.
4
Post-INSURE Administration of Heated Humidified High-Flow Therapy Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants More Than 28 Weeks Gestation with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.28 周以上有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气与加热湿化高流量鼻导管吸氧序贯治疗的随机非劣效性试验。
J Trop Pediatr. 2022 Jun 6;68(4). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmac062.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation.与常规护理相比,加热湿化高流量鼻导管对早产儿的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(30):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta20300.
6
Enteral Nutrition Tolerance And REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.早产儿肠内营养耐受性与呼吸支持(ENTARES)研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3119-0.
7
Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Weaning from Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.加热湿化高流量鼻导管在早产儿撤离持续气道正压通气中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Neonatology. 2016;110(3):204-9. doi: 10.1159/000446063. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates.加热、湿化高流量鼻导管与鼻塞持续气道正压通气在新生儿呼吸支持中的比较。
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1482-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2742. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
9
Positive distending pressure produced by heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants.与经鼻持续气道正压通气相比,加热湿化高流量鼻导管在早产儿中产生的正扩张压。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014 Jan 1;7(2):119-24. doi: 10.3233/NPM-1474113.
10
[Efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in neonates].[加温湿化高流量鼻导管预防新生儿拔管失败的有效性和安全性]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;52(4):271-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Preterm infants' first breastfeeding attempt: Early initiation and performance: A large multicentre questionnaire study based on maternal observations.早产儿的首次母乳喂养尝试:早期开始与表现:一项基于母亲观察的大型多中心问卷调查研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0303224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303224. eCollection 2025.
2
Enteral feeding in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis requiring non-invasive support via nasal interface.患有细支气管炎且需通过鼻接口进行无创支持的儿科患者的肠内喂养
Pediatr Res. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04022-z.
3
Feeding Infants on Noninvasive Respiratory Support: Practice at One Academic Medical Center.
为接受无创呼吸支持的婴儿提供喂养:一家学术医疗中心的实践
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Mar 10;34(2):617-632. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Oral feeding practices in medically complex infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula support: A retrospective cohort study.接受长期高流量鼻导管支持的复杂医学状况婴儿的经口喂养实践:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec;60(12):796-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16679. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Introduction of oral feeding in premature infants on high flow nasal cannula in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement initiative.经鼻高流量湿化氧疗在 IV 级新生儿重症监护病房早产儿中的喂养引入:一项质量改进举措。
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov;44(11):1692-1699. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01917-3. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Treatment of Pediatric Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Considerations for Oral Feeding: A Review of the Literature.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿患者及口腔喂养注意事项:文献综述
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022 Apr;7(2):543-552. doi: 10.1044/2021_persp-21-00152. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Oral Feeding in Infants After Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair While on Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: The Impact of a Dysphagia Provider-Led Protocol.先天性膈疝修补术后经无创正压通气行口喂养:吞咽障碍提供者主导方案的影响。
Dysphagia. 2022 Oct;37(5):1305-1313. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10391-4. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
8
Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with CPAP in preterm infants? A systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管与 CPAP 相比能否降低早产儿支气管肺发育不良的风险?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02881-z.