Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00965-4.
Catecholamines are the first-line vasopressors used in patients with septic shock. However, the search for novel drug candidates is still of great importance due to the development of adrenergic hyposensitivity accompanied by a decrease in catecholamine activity. Terlipressin (TP) is a synthetic vasopressin analogue used in the management of patients with septic shock. In the current study, we aimed to compare the effects of TP and catecholamine infusion in treating septic shock patients.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching articles published in PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between inception and July 2018. We only selected randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of TP and catecholamine in adult patients with septic shock. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes were the ICU length of stay, haemodynamic changes, tissue perfusion, renal function, and adverse events.
A total of 9 studies with 850 participants were included in the analysis. Overall, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the TP and catecholamine groups (risk ratio(RR), 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03); P = 0.09). In patients < 60 years old, the mortality rate was lower in the TP group than in the catecholamine group (RR, 0.66 (0.50 to 0.86); P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the ICU length of stay (mean difference, MD), - 0.28 days; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.25 to 0.69; P = 0.58). Additionally, TP improved renal function. The creatinine level was decreased in patients who received TP therapy compared to catecholamine-treated participants (standard mean difference, SMD), - 0.65; 95% CI, - 1.09 to - 0.22; P = 0.003). No significant difference was found regarding the total adverse events (Odds Ratio(OR), 1.48(0.51 to 4.24); P = 0.47), whereas peripheral ischaemia was more common in the TP group (OR, 8.65(1.48 to 50.59); P = 0.02).
The use of TP was associated with reduced mortality in septic shock patients less than 60 years old. TP may also improve renal function and cause more peripheral ischaemia. PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872.
儿茶酚胺是脓毒性休克患者的一线血管加压药。然而,由于儿茶酚胺活性下降伴随肾上腺素能低敏性的发展,寻找新的药物候选物仍然非常重要。特利加压素(TP)是一种合成的血管加压素类似物,用于治疗脓毒性休克患者。在本研究中,我们旨在比较 TP 和儿茶酚胺输注在治疗脓毒性休克患者中的效果。
通过在 PUBMED、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中搜索自成立至 2018 年 7 月发表的文章,进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们仅选择了评估 TP 和儿茶酚胺在成年脓毒性休克患者中应用的随机对照试验。主要结局是总死亡率。次要结局是 ICU 住院时间、血流动力学变化、组织灌注、肾功能和不良事件。
共有 9 项研究,850 名参与者纳入分析。总体而言,TP 组与儿茶酚胺组死亡率无显著差异(风险比[RR],0.85(0.70 至 1.03);P=0.09)。在<60 岁的患者中,TP 组的死亡率低于儿茶酚胺组(RR,0.66(0.50 至 0.86);P=0.002)。两组 ICU 住院时间无显著差异(平均差,-0.28 天;95%置信区间,-1.25 至 0.69;P=0.58)。此外,TP 改善了肾功能。与接受儿茶酚胺治疗的参与者相比,接受 TP 治疗的患者肌酐水平降低(标准均数差,-0.65;95%置信区间,-1.09 至 -0.22;P=0.003)。两组总不良事件发生率无显著差异(比值比[OR],1.48(0.51 至 4.24);P=0.47),但 TP 组外周缺血更为常见(OR,8.65(1.48 至 50.59);P=0.02)。
TP 治疗 60 岁以下脓毒性休克患者的死亡率降低。TP 还可能改善肾功能并导致更多外周缺血。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016035872。