Suppr超能文献

与传统疗法相比,血管加压素和特利加压素在新生儿和儿科难治性休克中的作用:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

作者信息

Masarwa Reem, Paret Gideon, Perlman Amichai, Reif Shimon, Raccah Bruria Hirsh, Matok Ilan

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2017 Jan 5;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) have been used as last-line therapy in refractory shock in children. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of AVP and TP have not been determined in pediatric refractory shock of different origins. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of AVP/TP therapy in pediatric refractory shock of all causes compared to conventional therapy with fluid resuscitation and vasopressor and inotropic therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) comparing AVP and TP to conventional therapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2016. The systematic review included all reports of AVP/TP use in the pediatric population. Reports of clinical trials were pooled using random-effects models and TSA. Main outcomes were mortality and tissue ischemia.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials and five "before-and-after clinical" trials (without comparator) met the inclusion criteria. Among 224 neonates and children (aged 0 to 18 years) with refractory shock, 152 received therapy with AVP or TP. Pooled analyses showed no association between AVP/TP treatment and mortality (relative risk (RR),1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-2.00), length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (mean difference (MD), -3.58 days; 95% CI, -9.05 to 1.83), and tissue ischemia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.47-4.62). In TSA, no significant effect on mortality and risk for developing tissue ischemia was observed with AVP/TP therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the lack of observed benefit for AVP/TP in terms of mortality and length of stay in the PICU, and suggest an increased risk for ischemic events. Our TSA suggests that further large studies are necessary to demonstrate and establish benefits of AVP/TP in children. PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872.

摘要

背景

血管加压素(AVP)和特利加压素(TP)已被用作儿童难治性休克的一线治疗药物。然而,AVP和TP在不同病因的儿童难治性休克中的疗效和安全性尚未确定。我们旨在评估与液体复苏、血管加压药和正性肌力药物的传统治疗相比,加用AVP/TP治疗对各种病因的儿童难治性休克的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析(TSA),比较AVP和TP与传统治疗。检索了截至2016年2月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov。系统评价纳入了所有关于AVP/TP在儿科人群中使用的报告。临床试验报告采用随机效应模型和TSA进行汇总。主要结局是死亡率和组织缺血。

结果

三项随机对照试验和五项“前后临床”试验(无对照)符合纳入标准。在224例患有难治性休克的新生儿和儿童(0至18岁)中,152例接受了AVP或TP治疗。汇总分析显示,AVP/TP治疗与死亡率(相对危险度(RR),1.19;95%置信区间(CI),0.71 - 2.00)、儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院时间(平均差(MD),-3.58天;95%CI,-9.05至1.83)和组织缺血(RR,1.48;95%CI,0.47 - 4.62)之间无关联。在TSA中,未观察到AVP/TP治疗对死亡率和发生组织缺血风险有显著影响。

结论

我们的结果强调,在死亡率和PICU住院时间方面,未观察到AVP/TP有明显益处,并提示缺血事件风险增加。我们的TSA表明,有必要进行进一步的大型研究以证明和确立AVP/TP对儿童的益处。PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42016035872。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008d/5217634/503ce336cfb2/13054_2016_1589_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验