• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OptiBIRTH:一项增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩的复杂干预措施的整群随机试验。

OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.

机构信息

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y
PMID:32138712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7059398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are low in many countries.

METHODS

OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC rates through an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 maternity units with VBAC rates < 35% in Germany, Ireland and Italy. Sites were matched in pairs or triplets based on annual birth numbers and VBAC rate, and randomised, 1:1 or 2:1, intervention versus control, following trial registration. The intervention involved evidence-based education of clinicians and women with one previous caesarean section (CS), appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review, and joint discussions by women and clinicians. Control sites provided usual care. Primary outcome was annual hospital-level VBAC rates before the trial (2012) versus final year of the trial (2016). Between April 2014 and October 2015, 2002 women were recruited (intervention 1195, control 807), with mode-of-birth data available for 1940 women.

RESULTS

The OptiBIRTH intervention was feasible and safe across hospital settings in three countries. There was no statistically significant difference in the change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between intervention sites (25.6% in 2012 to 25.1% in 2016) and control sites (18.3 to 22.3%) (odds ratio adjusted for differences between intervention and control groups (2012) and for homogeneity in VBAC rates at sites in the countries: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.14, p = 0.32 based on 5674 women (2012) and 5284 (2016) with outcome data. Among recruited women with birth data, 4/1147 perinatal deaths > 24 weeks gestation occurred in the intervention group (0.34%) and 4/782 in the control group (0.51%), and two uterine ruptures (one per group), a rate of 1:1000.

CONCLUSIONS

Changing clinical practice takes time. As elective repeat CS is the most common reason for CS in multiparous women, interventions that are feasible and safe and that have been shown to lead to decreasing repeat CS, should be promoted. Continued research to refine the best way of promoting VBAC is essential. This may best be done using an implementation science approach that can modify evidence-based interventions in response to changing clinical circumstances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The OptiBIRTH trial was registered on 3/4/2013. Trial registration number ISRCTN10612254.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据支持剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的安全性,但在许多国家,VBAC 的比例仍然很低。

方法

OptiBIRTH 研究了一项以女性为中心的干预措施的效果,该措施旨在通过在德国、爱尔兰和意大利的 15 个产科单位进行非盲、集群随机试验来提高 VBAC 率。这些单位根据年度分娩数量和 VBAC 率进行配对或成组随机分组,干预组与对照组的比例为 1:1 或 2:1。在试验注册后,采用基于证据的临床医生和有过一次剖宫产的女性教育、任命意见领袖、审核/同行审查以及女性和临床医生的联合讨论。对照组提供常规护理。主要结局是试验前(2012 年)和试验最后一年(2016 年)的医院年度 VBAC 率。2014 年 4 月至 2015 年 10 月,共招募了 2002 名妇女(干预组 1195 名,对照组 807 名),其中 1940 名妇女的分娩方式数据可用。

结果

在三个国家的医院环境中,OptiBIRTH 干预措施是可行且安全的。干预组(2012 年为 25.6%,2016 年为 25.1%)和对照组(18.3%至 22.3%)的 VBAC 比例变化没有统计学意义(调整了干预组和对照组之间的差异(2012 年)和国家内各单位 VBAC 率的同质性的比值比(2012 年):0.87,95%CI:0.67,1.14,p=0.32,基于 5674 名(2012 年)和 5284 名(2016 年)有结局数据的妇女。在有分娩数据的招募妇女中,干预组有 4/1147 例围产儿死亡(>24 周)(0.34%),对照组有 4/782 例(0.51%),两组各有 1 例子宫破裂(每组 1 例),发生率为 1:1000。

结论

改变临床实践需要时间。由于选择性重复剖宫产是多产妇剖宫产的最常见原因,因此应推广可行且安全并已证明可降低重复剖宫产率的干预措施。继续研究以完善促进 VBAC 的最佳方法至关重要。这最好通过实施科学方法来实现,可以根据不断变化的临床情况修改基于证据的干预措施。

试验注册

OptiBIRTH 试验于 2013 年 3 月 4 日注册。试验注册号:ISRCTN84303264。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/efd825bb9ce9/12884_2020_2829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/f374abbb8088/12884_2020_2829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/ec24a62acbd1/12884_2020_2829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/efd825bb9ce9/12884_2020_2829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/f374abbb8088/12884_2020_2829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/ec24a62acbd1/12884_2020_2829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfaa/7059398/efd825bb9ce9/12884_2020_2829_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.OptiBIRTH:一项增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩的复杂干预措施的整群随机试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y.
2
Health economic analysis of a cluster-randomised trial (OptiBIRTH) designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section.一项旨在提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的整群随机试验(OptiBIRTH)的卫生经济学分析。
BJOG. 2019 Jul;126(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15673. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
3
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.临床医生对提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)率的重要因素的看法:来自VBAC率高的国家的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 28;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6.
4
Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254).通过强化以妇女为中心的护理来改善孕产妇保健服务的组织,并通过增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩来优化分娩(OptiBIRTH试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案(ISRCTN10612254)
Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1061-y.
5
Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries.剖宫产后阴道分娩与前一次剖宫产术后选择性再次剖宫产分娩的成本效益分析:四个欧洲国家的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1720-6.
6
Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.在三个欧洲国家,有一次剖宫产史后的分娩方式偏好和产后健康相关生活质量。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102536. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates.临床医生对提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)率的重要因素的看法:来自VBAC率较低国家的一项研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1144-0.
8
Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section in countries with high and low rates - A hermeneutic study.不同文化视角下高、低剖宫产率国家经剖宫产术后阴道分娩的研究——阐释学研究。
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):e339-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.300. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review.以临床医生为中心的增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的干预措施:一项系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 5;15:16. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0441-3.
10
Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries.欧洲三个国家剖宫产术后成功经阴道分娩女性的分娩特征
Midwifery. 2019 Jul;74:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
Investigating the implementation of a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates: a multisite quality improvement initiative.调查剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)方案在降低剖宫产率方面的实施情况:一项多中心质量改进计划。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088734.
3
Exploring the content and delivery of feedback facilitation co-interventions: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.在三个欧洲国家,有一次剖宫产史后的分娩方式偏好和产后健康相关生活质量。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102536. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section in countries with high and low rates - A hermeneutic study.不同文化视角下高、低剖宫产率国家经剖宫产术后阴道分娩的研究——阐释学研究。
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):e339-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.300. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.
探索反馈促进共同干预的内容和实施方式:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2024 May 28;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01365-9.
4
Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis.针对孕妇的教育干预措施以优化剖宫产的使用:关键要素是什么?一项定性比较分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):1851. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0.
5
Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features.针对医疗保健提供者的干预措施以优化剖宫产术的使用:确定重要干预特征的定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08783-9.
6
Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.剖宫产一次,就永远要剖宫产吗?产科医生对剖宫产术后试产咨询的处理方式。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Mar 13;2(2):100054. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100054. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Neonatal outcomes associated with mode of subsequent birth after a previous caesarean section in a first pregnancy: a Swedish population-based register study between 1999 and 2015.首次剖宫产术后再次分娩方式与新生儿结局的关系:1999 年至 2015 年瑞典基于人群的登记研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jul;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001519.
8
Implementation of guidelines about women with previous cesarean section through educational/motivational interventions.通过教育/激励干预措施实施有关既往剖宫产妇女的指南。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;159(3):810-816. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14212. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.
产妇护理中的共享决策:承认和克服认识上的反驳。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1113-1120. doi: 10.1111/jep.13243. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries.欧洲三个国家剖宫产术后成功经阴道分娩女性的分娩特征
Midwifery. 2019 Jul;74:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
6
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
7
Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries.剖宫产后阴道分娩与前一次剖宫产术后选择性再次剖宫产分娩的成本效益分析:四个欧洲国家的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1720-6.
8
Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section.对OptiBIRTH进行过程评估,OptiBIRTH是一项旨在提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的复杂干预措施的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2401-x.
9
Recent Trends in Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section.剖宫产术后阴道分娩的近期趋势
Ir Med J. 2016 Dec 12;109(10):482.
10
Vaginal birth after caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:VBAC率较低国家女性的观点。
Women Birth. 2017 Dec;30(6):481-490. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 22.