• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。

"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, SS 554 - bivio Sestu, Monserrato, 09032, Cagliari, Italy.

Queen Margaret University, Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1
PMID:33302920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7731545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvements in medical technologies have seen over-medicalization of childbirth. Caesarean section (CS) is a lifesaving procedure proven effective in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality across the globe. However, as with any medical procedure, the CS intrinsically carries some risk to its beneficiaries. In recent years, CS rates have risen alarmingly in high-income countries. Many exceeding the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation of a 10 to 15% annual CS rate. While this situation poses an increased risk to women and their children, it also represents an excess human and financial burden on health systems. Therefore, from a health system perspective this study systematically summarizes existing evidence relevant to the factors driving the phenomenon of increasing CS rates using Italy as a case study.

METHODS

Employing the WHO Health System Framework (WHOHSF), this systematic review used the PRISMA guidelines to report findings. PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched up until April 1, 2020. Findings were organised through the six dimensions of the WHOHSF framework: service delivery, health workforce, health system information; medical products vaccine and technologies, financing; and leadership and governance.

RESULTS

CS rates in Italy are affected by complex interactions among several stakeholder groups and contextual factors such as the hyper-medicalisation of delivery, differences in policy and practice across units and the national context, issues pertaining to the legal and social environment, and women's attitudes towards pregnancy and childbirth.

CONCLUSION

Mitigating the high rates of CS will require a synergistic multi-stakeholder intervention. Specifically, with processes able to attract the official endorsement of policy makers, encourage concensus between regional authorities and local governments and guide the systematic compliance of delivery units with its clinical guidelines.

摘要

背景

医疗技术的进步导致了分娩的过度医疗化。剖宫产(CS)是一种已被证明在全球范围内有效降低孕产妇和围产期死亡率的救生程序。然而,与任何医疗程序一样,CS 本身对其受益者也存在一些风险。近年来,高收入国家的 CS 率惊人地上升。许多国家的 CS 率超过了世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的每年 10%至 15%的 CS 率。虽然这种情况对妇女及其子女构成了更大的风险,但也对卫生系统造成了额外的人力和财政负担。因此,从卫生系统的角度来看,本研究系统地总结了与导致 CS 率上升现象相关的现有证据,以意大利为例。

方法

本系统评价采用世界卫生组织卫生系统框架(WHOHSF),并按照 PRISMA 指南报告研究结果。检索了 PubMed、SCOPUS、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 4 月 1 日。研究结果通过 WHOHSF 框架的六个维度进行组织:服务提供、卫生人力、卫生系统信息;医疗产品、疫苗和技术、筹资;以及领导力和治理。

结果

意大利的 CS 率受到几个利益相关者群体和情境因素之间的复杂相互作用的影响,例如分娩的过度医疗化、单位之间政策和实践的差异、与法律和社会环境相关的问题,以及妇女对怀孕和分娩的态度。

结论

降低 CS 的高比率需要多利益攸关方的协同干预。具体来说,需要能够吸引决策者正式支持的流程,鼓励区域当局和地方政府之间达成共识,并指导分娩单位系统地遵守其临床指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/f0d62b45400f/12884_2020_3462_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/c65558c91088/12884_2020_3462_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/378be0145b8c/12884_2020_3462_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/f0d62b45400f/12884_2020_3462_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/c65558c91088/12884_2020_3462_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/378be0145b8c/12884_2020_3462_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5dd/7731545/f0d62b45400f/12884_2020_3462_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.
2
Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions.减少不必要的剖宫产:财务和监管干预措施的范围审查
Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00983-y.
3
Variation in caesarean section rates in Cyprus, Italy and Iceland: an analysis of the role of the media.塞浦路斯、意大利和冰岛剖宫产率的差异:媒体作用的分析。
Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Dec;70(6):676-686. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04295-8. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
[Risk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy)].[意大利坎帕尼亚地区择期剖宫产的危险因素分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):101-10.
5
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.
6
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
7
Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.公立医院和私立医院中女性的偏好与分娩方式:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
8
Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.埃及剖宫产的医学和非医学原因:一项基于医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2.
9
Identification of factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM.运用多准则决策方法识别影响巴基斯坦剖宫产率上升的因素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Oct 8;31(8):1058-1069. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2018-0087.
10
Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.理解导致原发性剖宫产和剖宫产后阴道分娩的因素:2005-2015 年意大利东北部弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57037-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Health outcomes up to 5 years in children born as a second child after a previous caesarean section in a first pregnancy: a Swedish population-based register study between 1999 and 2015.首次剖宫产术后再次妊娠所生二孩至5岁时的健康结局:一项基于瑞典人群登记的1999年至2015年的研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 25;9(1):e003026. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003026.
2
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity on Delivery Outcomes for Pregnant Women between 2020 and 2021: A Single-Center Population-Based Analysis.2020年至2021年期间新冠病毒检测呈阳性对孕妇分娩结局的影响:一项基于单中心人群的分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7709. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247709.
3

本文引用的文献

1
OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.OptiBIRTH:一项增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩的复杂干预措施的整群随机试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y.
2
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
3
Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic.遏制全球剖宫产流行趋势。
[Classification of caesarean sections by 10 Robson groups in a second level hospital].
[二级医院剖宫产按10个罗布森组分类]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S343-S349.
4
Risk factors associated with severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a 10-year propensity score-matched observational study.阴道分娩时严重会阴裂伤的相关危险因素:一项为期10年的倾向评分匹配观察性研究。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Mar 7;3(2):100174. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100174. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Evolution of cesarean sections in Colombia and its association with the legal standing of the institutions where deliveries take place.哥伦比亚剖宫产术的演变及其与分娩机构法律地位的关联。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2023 Mar 30;74(1):15-27. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3901.
6
National, longitudinal NASCITA birth cohort study to investigate the health of Italian children and potential influencing factors.全国性、纵向 NASCITA 出生队列研究,旨在调查意大利儿童的健康状况及潜在影响因素。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):e063394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063394.
7
Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Israel: Maternity department policies and obstetricians' perspectives.以色列产妇要求剖宫产:妇产科政策和产科医生的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221125366. doi: 10.1177/17455057221125366.
8
[A prospective randomized controlled study on the repair of skin and soft tissue defect in functional areas of children with full-thickness skin grafts from different sites of abdomen].[一项关于采用腹部不同部位全厚皮片修复儿童功能区皮肤软组织缺损的前瞻性随机对照研究]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 20;38(8):744-752. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210709-00243.
9
Which classification system could empower the understanding of caesarean section rates in Greece? A review of systematic reviews.哪种分类系统能够增强对希腊剖宫产率的理解?系统评价的综述。
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 16;6:39. doi: 10.18332/ejm/147993. eCollection 2022.
10
Has the cesarean epidemic in Czechia been reversed despite fertility postponement?捷克的剖宫产热潮是否在生育推迟的情况下得到了逆转?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04781-1.
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32394-8.
4
Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY.原发性剖宫产的趋势:意大利阿布鲁佐地区的五年经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3332-2.
5
Measuring health systems strength and its impact: experiences from the African Health Initiative.衡量卫生系统的实力及其影响:非洲卫生倡议的经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 21;17(Suppl 3):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2658-5.
6
Using the World Health Organization health system building blocks through survey of healthcare professionals to determine the performance of public healthcare facilities.通过对医疗保健专业人员进行调查,运用世界卫生组织的卫生系统构建模块来确定公共医疗设施的绩效。
Arch Public Health. 2017 Aug 31;75:50. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0221-9. eCollection 2017.
7
[Give birth in Italy is a "surgical" procedure.].在意大利分娩是一种“外科手术”程序。 (不过原英文句子表述有误,正确的应该是Giving birth in Italy is a "surgical" procedure. )
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Nov;107(11):559-561. doi: 10.1701/2484.25956.
8
Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Cesarean Birth: A Scoping Review.电子胎儿监护与剖宫产:一项范围综述
Birth. 2016 Dec;43(4):277-284. doi: 10.1111/birt.12247. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
9
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
10
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22.