Suppr超能文献

临床医生对提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)率的重要因素的看法:来自VBAC率高的国家的定性研究

Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.

作者信息

Lundgren Ingela, van Limbeek Evelien, Vehvilainen-Julkunen Katri, Nilsson Christina

机构信息

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 28;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most common reason for caesarean section (CS) is repeat CS following previous CS. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) rates vary widely in different healthcare settings and countries. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Interview studies with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of 'OptiBIRTH', an ongoing research project. The study reported here is based on interviews in high VBAC countries. The aim of the study was to investigate the views of clinicians working in countries with high VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.

METHODS

Individual (face-to-face or telephone) interviews and focus group interviews with clinicians (in different maternity care settings) in three countries with high VBAC rates were conducted during 2012-2013. In total, 44 clinicians participated: 26 midwives and 18 obstetricians. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.

RESULTS

The findings are presented in four main categories with subcategories. First, a common approach is needed, including: feeling confident with VBAC, considering VBAC as the first alternative, communicating well, working in a team, working in accordance with a model and making agreements with the woman. Second, obstetricians need to make the final decision on the mode of delivery while involving women in counselling towards VBAC. Third, a woman who has a previous CS has a similar need for support as other labouring women, but with some extra precautions and additional recommendations for her care. Finally, clinicians should help strengthen women's trust in VBAC, including building their trust in giving birth vaginally, recognising that giving birth naturally is an empowering experience for women, alleviating fear and offering extra visits to discuss the previous CS, and joining with the woman in a dialogue while leaving the decision about the mode of birth open.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, according to midwives and obstetricians from countries with high VBAC rates, the important factors for improving the VBAC rate are related to the structure of the maternity care system in the country, to the cooperation between midwives and obstetricians, and to the care offered during pregnancy and birth. More research on clinicians' perspectives is needed from countries with low, as well as high, VBAC rates.

摘要

背景

剖宫产(CS)最常见的原因是既往剖宫产史后的再次剖宫产。不同医疗环境和国家的剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)率差异很大。深入了解临床医生对VBAC的看法有助于理解提高VBAC率的重要因素。在三个VBAC率高的国家(芬兰、瑞典和荷兰)以及三个VBAC率低的国家(爱尔兰、意大利和德国)对临床医生和女性进行访谈研究是正在进行的“OptiBIRTH”研究项目的一部分。此处报告的研究基于对VBAC率高的国家的访谈。该研究的目的是调查在VBAC率高的国家工作的临床医生对提高VBAC率的重要因素的看法。

方法

2012年至2013年期间,对三个VBAC率高的国家的临床医生(在不同的产科护理环境中)进行了个人(面对面或电话)访谈和焦点小组访谈。共有44名临床医生参与:26名助产士和18名产科医生。使用了五个关于VBAC的核心问题,并采用内容分析法对访谈进行分析。分析在每个国家以母语进行,然后翻译成英语。然后对所有数据进行综合分析,并在每个国家对最终类别进行验证。

结果

研究结果分为四个主要类别及子类别。第一,需要一种通用方法,包括:对VBAC有信心、将VBAC视为首选、良好沟通、团队协作、按照模式工作以及与产妇达成协议。第二,产科医生在让产妇参与VBAC咨询的同时,需要对分娩方式做出最终决定。第三,有既往剖宫产史的产妇与其他分娩产妇有类似的支持需求,但需要一些额外的预防措施和针对其护理的额外建议。最后,临床医生应帮助增强产妇对VBAC的信任,包括建立她们对阴道分娩的信任、认识到自然分娩对产妇来说是一种增强力量的体验、减轻恐惧并提供额外的就诊以讨论既往剖宫产情况,以及与产妇进行对话,同时让分娩方式的决定保持开放。

结论

本研究表明,根据VBAC率高的国家的助产士和产科医生的观点,提高VBAC率的重要因素与该国产科护理系统的结构、助产士和产科医生之间的合作以及孕期和分娩期间提供 的护理有关。VBAC率低和高的国家都需要对临床医生的观点进行更多研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Continuous support for women during childbirth.分娩期间对女性的持续支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5.
7
Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery care.迈向助产护理决策的关系模型。
Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):e42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
10
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:新见解
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Mar(191):1-397.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验