• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别行政健康数据中具有身体和感官残疾的育龄妇女:系统评价。

Identifying reproductive-aged women with physical and sensory disabilities in administrative health data: A systematic review.

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Centre for Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100909. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100909. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100909
PMID:32139320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7387197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with disabilities experience significant health disparities. A barrier to progress in addressing these disparities is the lack of population-based data on their health outcomes, which are needed to plan health care delivery systems. Administrative health data are increasingly being used to measure the health of entire populations, but these data may only capture impairment and not activity and participation restrictions.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review to identify and appraise existing literature on the development and validation of algorithms to identify reproductive-aged women with physical and sensory disabilities in administrative health data.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to April 2019 for studies of the development and/or validation of algorithms using diagnostic, procedural, or prescription codes to identify physical and sensory disabilities in administrative health data. Study and algorithm characteristics were extracted and quality was assessed using standardized instruments.

RESULTS

Of 14,073 articles initially identified, we reviewed 6 articles representing 2 unique algorithms. One algorithm aimed to correlate diagnoses, procedure codes, and prescriptions with ability to access routine care as an indicator of functional limitation. The other algorithm used diagnostic and procedure codes to identify use of mobility-assistive devices to measure functional limitation. Only one algorithm was validated against self-reported disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the need to strengthen current methods to identify disability in administrative health data, including linkage with other sources of information on functional limitations, so that population-based data can be used to optimize health care for women with disabilities.

摘要

背景

残疾女性的健康差距较大。在解决这些差距方面,一个障碍是缺乏针对其健康结果的基于人群的数据,而这些数据是规划医疗保健提供系统所必需的。行政健康数据越来越多地被用于衡量整个人群的健康状况,但这些数据可能仅捕捉到损伤,而无法捕捉到活动和参与受限的情况。

目的

我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定和评估现有文献,这些文献涉及在行政健康数据中开发和验证用于识别处于生育年龄的身体和感官残疾女性的算法。

方法

我们从建库开始到 2019 年 4 月,在 Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Scopus 中搜索了关于使用诊断、程序或处方代码在行政健康数据中识别身体和感官残疾的算法的开发和/或验证的研究。提取研究和算法特征,并使用标准化工具评估质量。

结果

在最初确定的 14073 篇文章中,我们审查了 6 篇代表 2 个独特算法的文章。一个算法旨在将诊断、程序代码和处方与常规护理的获取能力相关联,作为功能限制的指标。另一个算法使用诊断和程序代码来识别使用移动辅助设备以衡量功能限制。只有一个算法针对自我报告的残疾进行了验证。

结论

我们的研究结果强调需要加强当前在行政健康数据中识别残疾的方法,包括与其他功能限制信息源的链接,以便能够使用基于人群的数据来优化残疾女性的医疗保健。

相似文献

1
Identifying reproductive-aged women with physical and sensory disabilities in administrative health data: A systematic review.识别行政健康数据中具有身体和感官残疾的育龄妇女:系统评价。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100909. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100909. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Identifying and classifying people with disabilities using claims data: further development of the Access Risk Classification System (ARCS) algorithm.利用索赔数据识别和分类残疾人士:扩展访问风险分类系统(ARCS)算法。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.001.
3
[Access to care and prevention for people with disabilities in France: Analysis based on data from the 2008 French health and disabilities households surveys (Handicap-Santé-Ménages)].法国残疾人的医疗服务可及性与预防:基于2008年法国健康与残疾家庭调查(“残疾 - 健康 - 家庭”调查)数据的分析
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2016 Apr;64(2):79-94. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2015.11.009. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
4
Breast cancer screening disparities between women with and without disabilities: A national database study in South Korea.乳腺癌筛查中残疾女性与非残疾女性之间的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。
Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;126(7):1522-1529. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32693. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Uninsured persons with disability confront substantial barriers to health care services.残疾的未参保人员在获得医疗服务方面面临着巨大的障碍。
Disabil Health J. 2011 Oct;4(4):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
Health outcome disparities among subgroups of people with disabilities: a scoping review.残疾人群体亚组之间的健康结果差异:一项范围综述。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Apr;7(2):136-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
7
Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United States.美国身体残疾或认知障碍成年人与无残疾个体之间的健康差距。
Disabil Health J. 2011 Apr;4(2):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
8
Maternal disability and risk for pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产妇残疾与妊娠、分娩和产后并发症风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):27.e1-27.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Accuracy of Algorithms to Identify Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Administrative Data: A Systematic Review.算法识别行政数据中肺动脉高压的准确性:系统评价。
Chest. 2019 Apr;155(4):680-688. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016.残疾状况和类型对美国成年人残疾和医疗保健获取的影响:2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods used to construct disability indicators in linked administrative datasets: a systematic scoping review.在关联行政数据集中构建残疾指标的方法:一项系统的范围综述。
Popul Health Metr. 2025 Jun 6;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12963-025-00386-w.
2
Disability and in-hospital breastfeeding practices and supports in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.加拿大安大略省的残疾与住院母乳喂养实践和支持:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jan;8(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00310-3.
3
Neonatal Outcomes of Mothers With a Disability.母亲残疾与新生儿结局的关系
Pediatrics. 2022 Sep 1;150(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055318.
4
Outcomes in patients with and without disability admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.COVID-19 住院患者有无残疾的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2022 Jan 31;194(4):E112-E121. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211277.
5
Development and Internal Validation of a Disability Algorithm for Multiple Sclerosis in Administrative Data.行政数据中多发性硬化症残疾算法的开发与内部验证
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 2;12:754144. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.754144. eCollection 2021.
6
Health of Newborns and Infants Born to Women With Disabilities: A Meta-analysis.残疾女性所生新生儿和婴儿的健康:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1635. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Preconception Health Characteristics of Women with Disabilities in Ontario: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study.安大略省残疾妇女的孕前健康特征:基于人群的横断面研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;29(12):1564-1575. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8273. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?人工智能能否帮助减少普通医疗和心理健康护理方面的差异?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):E167-179. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.167.
2
Developing a systematic search strategy related to people with disability: A brief report testing the utility of proposed disability search terms in a search about opioid use.制定与残疾人群相关的系统检索策略:在一项关于阿片类药物使用的检索中测试拟议残疾检索词实用性的简要报告。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Apr;12(2):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
Persistence and Drivers of High-Cost Status Among Dual-Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries: An Observational Study.双重资格的医疗保险和医疗补助受益人中高成本状况的持续存在及其驱动因素:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):528-534. doi: 10.7326/M18-0085. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016.残疾状况和类型对美国成年人残疾和医疗保健获取的影响:2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.
5
Data Mining Algorithms and Techniques in Mental Health: A Systematic Review.数据挖掘算法和技术在精神健康中的应用:系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2018 Jul 21;42(9):161. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1018-2.
6
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. A Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录中的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。系统文献综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 20;8(3):964-980. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017050078.
7
Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.残疾女性的分娩和剖宫产的时间趋势。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Primary Cesarean Delivery Patterns among Women with Physical, Sensory, or Intellectual Disabilities.身体、感官或智力残疾女性的初次剖宫产分娩模式。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May-Jun;27(3):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Pregnancy Characteristics and Outcomes among Women at Risk for Disability from Health Conditions Identified in Medical Claims.医疗理赔中确定的有健康状况导致残疾风险的女性的妊娠特征及结局
Womens Health Issues. 2016 Sep-Oct;26(5):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Supplemental Security Income Benefits for Mental Disorders.精神障碍的补充保障收入福利。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0354. Epub 2016 Jun 8.