• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National Medicines Policy 2.0: a vision for the future.《国家药品政策2.0:未来愿景》
Aust Prescr. 2020 Feb;43(1):24-26. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.007. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Consumer involvement in Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) projects - lessons from Australia.消费者参与药品合理使用(QUM)项目——来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec 1;5:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-75.
3
A perspective on Australia's National Medicines Policy.对澳大利亚国家药品政策的一种观点。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Spring;11(1):e28-38.
4
Challenges to pharmaceutical policymaking: lessons from Australia's national medicines policy.制药政策制定面临的挑战:来自澳大利亚国家药品政策的经验教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 May;38(2):160-8. doi: 10.1071/AH13240.
5
Balancing health and industrial policy objectives in the pharmaceutical sector: lessons from Australia.平衡制药行业的健康与产业政策目标:来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Evaluating Australia's National Medicines Policy using geographical mapping.运用地理映射法评估澳大利亚国家药品政策。
Intern Med J. 2002 Mar;32(3):66-71.
7
The Medicines Intelligence Centre of Research Excellence: Co-creating real-world evidence to support the evidentiary needs of Australian medicines regulators and payers.卓越药品情报研究中心:共同创建真实世界证据,以满足澳大利亚药品监管机构和支付方的证据需求。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Jun 13;6(3):1726. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1726. eCollection 2021.
8
Patient access to medicines in two countries with similar health systems and differing medicines policies: Implications from a comprehensive literature review.两国患者获取药品情况比较:卫生体制相似,药品政策不同——基于全面文献回顾的结果
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Mar;15(3):231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Improving medicine selection for older people - do we need an Australian classification for inappropriate medicines use?改善老年人的药物选择——我们是否需要一个澳大利亚不适当用药分类标准?
Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;41(1-2):9-10.

引用本文的文献

1
The need to update Ethiopia's national health and medicine policies: essential tools for informed decision-making in healthcare and the pharmaceutical sectors.更新埃塞俄比亚国家卫生与医学政策的必要性:医疗保健和制药部门明智决策的重要工具。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1533710. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1533710. eCollection 2025.
2
Unpacking the process of developing South Africa's national drug policy - lessons for universal health coverage.剖析南非国家药物政策的制定过程——全民健康覆盖的经验教训
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jul 17;17(1):2376349. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2376349. eCollection 2024.
3
Drawing up the public national Rational Pharmacotherapy Action Plan as part of social and health services reform in Finland: a bottom-up approach involving stakeholders.作为芬兰社会和卫生服务改革的一部分,制定国家公共合理药物治疗行动计划:涉及利益相关者的自下而上方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 16;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11068-y.
4
National Medicines Policy 2.0-what's changed and what's next?《国家药品政策2.0》——有哪些变化,接下来又会怎样?
Aust Prescr. 2023 Dec;46(4):72-74. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2023.023.
5
Healthcare Providers' Attitudes and Experiences of the Quality Use of Medications Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients in Australia: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.澳大利亚文化和语言多样化患者中药物合理使用的质量:定性研究的系统评价——医疗保健提供者的态度和经验
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Feb;26(1):181-199. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01522-0. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Culturally and linguistically diverse patients' perspectives and experiences on medicines management in Australia: a systematic review.澳大利亚具有文化和语言多样性的患者对药物管理的观点和体验:系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):814-829. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01560-6. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
National medicines policy development, Saudi Arabia.国家药品政策制定,沙特阿拉伯。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Aug 1;100(8):511-519. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.287936. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
8
Australian podiatrists scheduled medicine prescribing practices and barriers and facilitators to endorsement: a cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚足病医生的开处方法和认可的障碍及促进因素:一项横断面调查。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Feb 8;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00515-w.
9
The extent to which off-patent registered prescription medicines are used for off-label indications in Australia: A scoping review.在澳大利亚,非专利注册处方药用于非标签适应证的程度:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 3;16(12):e0261022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261022. eCollection 2021.
10
Rational prescribing: 30 years after.合理用药:30年后
Aust Prescr. 2021 Aug;44(4):116-117. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2021.026. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Australia's National Medicines Policy is outdated and in need of review.
Med J Aust. 2019 Sep;211(6):252-254.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50268. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
2
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness.《柳叶刀》精神病学委员会:保护精神疾病患者身体健康的蓝图。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;6(8):675-712. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30132-4. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Medicine shortages in Australia - what are we doing about them?澳大利亚的药品短缺问题——我们正在采取什么措施应对?
Aust Prescr. 2018 Oct;41(5):136-137. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2018.047. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Complementary medicine use by the Australian population: a critical mixed studies systematic review of utilisation, perceptions and factors associated with use.澳大利亚民众对补充医学的使用:一项关于使用情况、认知以及使用相关因素的批判性混合研究系统综述
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Jun 11;16:176. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1143-8.
5
Mental health of Indigenous Australians: a review of findings from community surveys.澳大利亚原住民的精神健康:社区调查结果综述。
Med J Aust. 2012 Feb 6;196:118-21. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10041.

《国家药品政策2.0:未来愿景》

National Medicines Policy 2.0: a vision for the future.

作者信息

McLachlan Andrew J, Aslani Parisa

机构信息

Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney.

出版信息

Aust Prescr. 2020 Feb;43(1):24-26. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.007. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

DOI:10.18773/austprescr.2020.007
PMID:32139959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7026915/
Abstract

Australia’s National Medicines Policy was launched 20 years ago with the aim of improving health outcomes for all Australians. It was developed in partnership with healthcare professionals, consumers and the pharmaceutical industry The key parts of the Policy focus on timely access to high-quality and affordable medicines and their safe and judicious use. It also supports a viable and responsible pharmaceutical industry Since the Policy was first launched, Australia has seen significant changes in healthcare systems, medicines subsidies, health services remuneration, digital technologies and the pharmaceutical industry Medicines themselves have also changed, as have consumers’ expectations. To respond to these changes, the National Medicines Policy needs to be updated with a greater focus on implementing and measuring outcomes

摘要

澳大利亚的《国家药品政策》于20年前推出,旨在改善全体澳大利亚人的健康状况。该政策是与医疗保健专业人员、消费者和制药行业合作制定的。该政策的关键部分侧重于及时获得高质量且价格合理的药品,以及安全、合理地使用这些药品。它还支持一个可行且负责的制药行业。自该政策首次推出以来,澳大利亚的医疗保健系统、药品补贴、医疗服务薪酬、数字技术和制药行业都发生了重大变化。药品本身也发生了变化,消费者的期望同样如此。为应对这些变化,需要更新《国家药品政策》,更加注重成果的落实和衡量。