Kozieł Monika, Simovic Stefan, Pavlovic Nikola, Nedeljkovic Milan, Paparisto Vilma, Music Ljilja, Goshev Evgenii, Dan Anca Rodica, Manola Sime, Kusljugic Zumreta, Trendafilova Elina, Dobrev Dobromir, Dan Gheorghe-Andrei, Lip Gregory Y H, Potpara Tatjana S
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019 Dec 28;26:100461. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100461. eCollection 2020 Feb.
BALKAN-AF evaluated patterns of atrial fibrillation (AF) management in real-world clinical practice in the Balkans. The objectives were: to assess the proportion of patients with first-diagnosed AF in the BALKAN-AF cohort and to compare the management of patients with newly-diagnosed AF and those with previously known AF in clinical practice.
Consecutive patients from 7 Balkan countries were enrolled prospectively to the snapshot BALKAN-AF survey.
Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2677 (98.7%) with complete data were included. 631 (23.6%) patients had newly-diagnosed AF and 2046 (76.4%) patients had known AF. Patients with newly-diagnosed AF were more likely to be hospitalized for AF and to receive single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) alone and less likely to receive OACs than those with known AF (all p < 0.001). The use of OAC was not significantly associated with the CHADS-VASc (p = 0.624) or HAS-BLED score (p = 0.225) on univariate analysis. Treatment in capital city, hypertension, dilated cardiomyopathy, mitral valve disease, country of residence or rate control strategy were independent predictors of OAC use, whilst non-emergency centre, treatment by cardiologist, paroxysmal AF, palpitations, symptoms attributable to AF (as judged by physician), mean heart rate and AF as the main reason for hospitalization were independent predictors of rhythm control strategy use.
In BALKAN-AF survey, patients with newly-diagnosed AF were more often hospitalized, less often received OAC and were more likely to receive SAPT alone. The use of OAC for stroke prevention has not been driven by the individual patient stroke risk.
巴尔干半岛房颤(AF)评估项目(BALKAN-AF)评估了巴尔干半岛实际临床实践中房颤的管理模式。目标如下:评估BALKAN-AF队列中首次诊断为房颤的患者比例,并比较临床实践中初诊房颤患者和既往已知房颤患者的管理情况。
前瞻性纳入来自7个巴尔干国家的连续患者,进行BALKAN-AF快照调查。
在2712名登记患者中,纳入了2677名(98.7%)有完整数据的患者。631名(23.6%)患者为新诊断房颤,2046名(76.4%)患者为已知房颤。与已知房颤患者相比,新诊断房颤患者因房颤住院的可能性更高,单独接受单一抗血小板治疗(SAPT)的可能性更大,接受口服抗凝剂(OAC)的可能性更小(所有p<0.001)。单因素分析显示,OAC的使用与CHADS-VASc评分(p=0.624)或HAS-BLED评分(p=0.225)无显著相关性。在首都接受治疗、高血压、扩张型心肌病、二尖瓣疾病、居住国家或心率控制策略是OAC使用的独立预测因素,而非急诊中心、由心脏病专家治疗、阵发性房颤、心悸、房颤所致症状(由医生判断)、平均心率以及房颤作为住院主要原因是节律控制策略使用的独立预测因素。
在BALKAN-AF调查中,新诊断房颤患者住院频率更高,接受OAC治疗的频率更低,且更有可能单独接受SAPT治疗。OAC用于预防卒中并非由个体患者的卒中风险所驱动。