Lange Annika, Franzmayr Sandra, Wisenöcker Vera, Futschik Andreas, Waiblinger Susanne, Lürzel Stephanie
Institute of Animal Welfare Science, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Applied Statistics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 4;10(3):426. doi: 10.3390/ani10030426.
Gentle animal-human interactions, such as stroking, can promote positive emotions and thus welfare in cattle. While previous studies showed that stroking at the ventral neck elicited the most positive reactions in cows, intra-specific allogrooming in cattle includes different body regions and is probably guided partly by the receiver. Thus, we compared heifers' ( = 28) reactions to stroking with the experimenter either reactively responding to perceived momentary preferences of the heifers or exclusively stroking the ventral neck. Independently of the stroking style, longer durations of neck stretching and contact occurred during stroking, supporting our hypothesis of a positive perception of stroking. We did not confirm the predicted decrease in heart rate and increase in heart rate variability, but instead found a slightly increased mean heart rate during stroking. The different stroking styles elicited differences in the heifers' ear positions: "reactive" stroking led to longer durations of low ear positions during stroking, while during "ventral neck" stroking, the duration of back up increased. However, no other behaviours differed significantly between different stroking styles, indicating that the exact manner of stroking applied in our treatments seemed to be less important in the promotion of positive affective states in cattle through gentle human-animal interactions.
温和的人与动物互动,如抚摸,可以促进积极情绪,从而提升牛的福利。虽然先前的研究表明,在牛的颈部腹侧进行抚摸会引发牛最积极的反应,但牛的种内互舐包括不同的身体部位,并且可能部分受接受者的引导。因此,我们比较了小母牛(n = 28)对实验者抚摸的反应,实验者要么对小母牛感知到的即时偏好做出反应,要么只抚摸颈部腹侧。无论抚摸方式如何,在抚摸过程中,颈部伸展和接触的持续时间更长,这支持了我们关于抚摸能产生积极感知的假设。我们没有证实预期的心率下降和心率变异性增加,反而发现抚摸过程中的平均心率略有上升。不同的抚摸方式引起了小母牛耳朵位置的差异:“反应性”抚摸导致抚摸过程中低耳朵位置的持续时间更长,而在“颈部腹侧”抚摸过程中,耳朵竖起的持续时间增加。然而,不同抚摸方式之间的其他行为没有显著差异,这表明在通过温和的人与动物互动促进牛的积极情感状态方面,我们实验中应用的具体抚摸方式似乎不那么重要。