Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8389-2.
Public health agencies in the United States have engaged in abortion-related activities for nearly 50 years. Prior research indicates that, while most state health departments engage in some abortion-related work, their efforts reflect what is required by law rather than the breadth of core public health activities. In contrast, local health departments appear to engage in abortion-related activities less often but, when they do, initiate a broader range of activities.
This study aimed to: 1) describe the abortion-related activities undertaken by maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning professionals in state and local health departments; 2) understand how health departments approach their programmatic work on abortion, and 3) examine the facilitators and barriers to whether and how abortion work is implemented. Between November 2017 and June 2018, we conducted key informant interviews with 29 professionals working in 22 state and local health departments across the U.S. Interview data were thematically coded and analyzed using an iterative approach.
MCH and family planning professionals described a range of abortion-related activities undertaken within their health departments. We identified three approaches to this work: those mandated strictly by law or policy; those initiated when mandated by law but informed by public health principles (e.g., scientific accuracy, expert engagement, lack of bias, promoting access to care) in implementation; and those initiated by professionals within the department to meet identified needs. More state health departments engaged in activities when mandated, and more local health departments initiated activities based on identified needs. Key barriers and facilitators included political climate, funding opportunities and restrictions, and departmental leadership.
Although state health departments are tasked with implementing legally-required abortion-related activities, some agencies bring public health principles to their mandated work. Efforts are needed to engage public health professionals in developing and implementing best practices around engaging in abortion-related activities.
美国公共卫生机构从事与堕胎相关的活动已有近 50 年。先前的研究表明,尽管大多数州卫生部门从事一些与堕胎相关的工作,但这些工作是根据法律要求进行的,而不是核心公共卫生活动的广泛范围。相比之下,地方卫生部门似乎较少从事与堕胎相关的活动,但在从事相关活动时,会开展更广泛的活动。
本研究旨在:1)描述州和地方卫生部门的母婴健康和计划生育专业人员开展的与堕胎相关的活动;2)了解卫生部门如何处理其关于堕胎的方案工作,以及 3)检验实施堕胎工作的促进因素和障碍,以及是否和如何实施堕胎工作。2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 6 月,我们对美国 22 个州和地方卫生部门的 29 名专业人员进行了关键知情人访谈。访谈数据采用迭代方法进行主题编码和分析。
母婴健康和计划生育专业人员描述了他们所在卫生部门开展的一系列与堕胎相关的活动。我们确定了三种处理这项工作的方法:严格按照法律或政策规定的方法;在法律规定的情况下,根据公共卫生原则(如科学准确性、专家参与、无偏见、促进获得护理)实施的方法;以及部门内部专业人员为满足已确定的需求而发起的方法。更多的州卫生部门在接到命令后开展活动,更多的地方卫生部门根据已确定的需求开展活动。主要障碍和促进因素包括政治氛围、资金机会和限制,以及部门领导。
尽管州卫生部门的任务是执行与堕胎相关的法律要求的活动,但一些机构将公共卫生原则应用于其法定工作。需要努力让公共卫生专业人员参与制定和实施与参与与堕胎相关的活动相关的最佳实践。