Sigronde L, Blanc J, Aho S, Pallot C, Bron A-M, Creuzot-Garcher C
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 May;43(5):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.006. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) compared with the orthoptic examination for detection of amblyopia risk factors in preschools.
This prospective study included children with a visual screening organized by the department of "le" (PMI) in Côte d'Or (Burgundy, France), between June 2017 and April 2018. All children were evaluated with the SVS followed by a clinical orthoptic examination. Results with the SVS were compared with those obtained by clinical orthoptic examination.
A total of 1236 subjects were included in the study from 100 preschools. The mean age of the children was 3.6±0.7 years, and 627 were female (50.7%). The orthoptic examination detected 308 (24.9%) children with subnormal visual acuity for age in one eye or both. In children with a history of prematurity, the orthoptic examination was more frequently abnormal (P=0.002), which was not seen with the SVS (P=0.050). The SVS screened 20 (1.6%) children with strabismus, while 40 (3.2%) were detected by orthoptic examination. At the end of the screening, the SVS detected 182 (14.7%) suspect patients while 311 (25.1%) suspect patients were detected after the orthoptic examination. Comparing SVS with orthoptic examination, agreement was fair (κ=0.4).
The SVS can be a useful device for visual screening, but agreement with the orthoptic examination was only fair. The Spot vision screener should be used in conjunction with a clinical orthoptic examination.
评估与验光检查相比,Spot视力筛查仪(SVS)用于检测学龄前儿童弱视危险因素的效果。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了2017年6月至2018年4月期间在法国勃艮第科多尔省由“le”部门(母婴保护项目)组织进行视力筛查的儿童。所有儿童均先接受SVS评估,随后进行临床验光检查。将SVS的检查结果与临床验光检查的结果进行比较。
该研究共纳入了来自100所幼儿园的1236名受试者。儿童的平均年龄为3.6±0.7岁,其中627名是女性(50.7%)。验光检查发现308名(24.9%)儿童存在单眼或双眼年龄别视力低于正常的情况。在有早产史的儿童中,验光检查的异常情况更为常见(P=0.002),而SVS未发现这种情况(P=0.050)。SVS筛查出20名(1.6%)斜视儿童,而验光检查发现了40名(3.2%)。在筛查结束时,SVS检测出182名(14.7%)疑似患者,而验光检查后检测出311名(25.1%)疑似患者。将SVS与验光检查进行比较,一致性为中等(κ=0.4)。
SVS可作为一种有用的视力筛查设备,但与验光检查的一致性仅为中等。Spot视力筛查仪应与临床验光检查结合使用。