Suppr超能文献

3至5岁学童视力筛查中,视力筛查仪与眼科检查的比较评估

Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in comparison with the orthoptic examination in visual screening in 3-5 year-old schoolchildren.

作者信息

Sigronde L, Blanc J, Aho S, Pallot C, Bron A-M, Creuzot-Garcher C

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France.

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France.

出版信息

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 May;43(5):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.006. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) compared with the orthoptic examination for detection of amblyopia risk factors in preschools.

METHODS

This prospective study included children with a visual screening organized by the department of "le" (PMI) in Côte d'Or (Burgundy, France), between June 2017 and April 2018. All children were evaluated with the SVS followed by a clinical orthoptic examination. Results with the SVS were compared with those obtained by clinical orthoptic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 1236 subjects were included in the study from 100 preschools. The mean age of the children was 3.6±0.7 years, and 627 were female (50.7%). The orthoptic examination detected 308 (24.9%) children with subnormal visual acuity for age in one eye or both. In children with a history of prematurity, the orthoptic examination was more frequently abnormal (P=0.002), which was not seen with the SVS (P=0.050). The SVS screened 20 (1.6%) children with strabismus, while 40 (3.2%) were detected by orthoptic examination. At the end of the screening, the SVS detected 182 (14.7%) suspect patients while 311 (25.1%) suspect patients were detected after the orthoptic examination. Comparing SVS with orthoptic examination, agreement was fair (κ=0.4).

CONCLUSION

The SVS can be a useful device for visual screening, but agreement with the orthoptic examination was only fair. The Spot vision screener should be used in conjunction with a clinical orthoptic examination.

摘要

目的

评估与验光检查相比,Spot视力筛查仪(SVS)用于检测学龄前儿童弱视危险因素的效果。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了2017年6月至2018年4月期间在法国勃艮第科多尔省由“le”部门(母婴保护项目)组织进行视力筛查的儿童。所有儿童均先接受SVS评估,随后进行临床验光检查。将SVS的检查结果与临床验光检查的结果进行比较。

结果

该研究共纳入了来自100所幼儿园的1236名受试者。儿童的平均年龄为3.6±0.7岁,其中627名是女性(50.7%)。验光检查发现308名(24.9%)儿童存在单眼或双眼年龄别视力低于正常的情况。在有早产史的儿童中,验光检查的异常情况更为常见(P=0.002),而SVS未发现这种情况(P=0.050)。SVS筛查出20名(1.6%)斜视儿童,而验光检查发现了40名(3.2%)。在筛查结束时,SVS检测出182名(14.7%)疑似患者,而验光检查后检测出311名(25.1%)疑似患者。将SVS与验光检查进行比较,一致性为中等(κ=0.4)。

结论

SVS可作为一种有用的视力筛查设备,但与验光检查的一致性仅为中等。Spot视力筛查仪应与临床验光检查结合使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验