Suppr超能文献

在一项人群筛查项目中,使用非散瞳视频验光和斜视检查来识别患有显著屈光不正和斜视的婴儿。

Identification of infants with significant refractive error and strabismus in a population screening program using noncycloplegic videorefraction and orthoptic examination.

作者信息

Anker Shirley, Atkinson Janette, Braddick Oliver, Ehrlich David, Hartley Thomas, Nardini Marko, Wade Jacqueline

机构信息

Visual Development Unit, Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Feb;44(2):497-504. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0070.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The second Cambridge Infant Vision Screening Program examined whether screening for accommodative errors by using videorefraction without cycloplegia could effectively serve as a first stage of screening for refractive errors, measured by standard cycloplegic retinoscopy. The screening also included an orthoptic examination for detection of strabismus.

METHODS

All infants born in the Cambridge (UK) Health District, over a 2-year period, were invited for screening. Of those 5142 (76%) with mean age 8.1 +/- 0.8 months (SD) attended and received noncycloplegic videorefraction and an orthoptic examination. All those with a focusing error or orthoptic problem, as well as a randomly selected sample of visually normal control subjects, were invited to follow-up a month later for cycloplegic retinoscopy, repeat noncycloplegic videorefraction and orthoptic examination.

RESULTS

Of the 5142 screened, 514 had a focusing error or orthoptic problem (positives). Four hundred thirty-nine of these and 284 visually normal control subjects (negatives) attended follow-up. A refractive or orthoptic condition was confirmed in 59.0% of the positive cases, whereas infants in 96.8% of the negative cases were confirmed normal. Adjusting for the proportions of the population represented by those infants seen at follow-up, sensitivity for the screening procedure was calculated at 0.67 and specificity at 0.96. Detailed results are presented in terms of the different conditions detected at screening (far, near, and anisometropic focus and orthoptic error), distribution of greatest axes at screening, and a comparison of initial videorefraction with repeat videorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

A noncycloplegic screening procedure, simpler to perform than cycloplegic screening, succeeded in detecting a large proportion of infants with significant ametropia, particularly those with significant hyperopia, which is considered to be a strabismogenic and amblyogenic risk factor.

摘要

目的

第二次剑桥婴儿视力筛查项目旨在研究,通过无睫状肌麻痹的电脑验光来筛查调节异常,能否有效地作为屈光不正筛查的第一阶段,而屈光不正通过标准的睫状肌麻痹视网膜检影来测量。该筛查还包括用于检测斜视的视光学检查。

方法

在两年期间,邀请了英国剑桥健康区出生的所有婴儿进行筛查。其中5142名(76%)平均年龄为8.1±0.8个月(标准差)的婴儿参加了筛查,并接受了无睫状肌麻痹的电脑验光和视光学检查。所有有聚焦异常或视光学问题的婴儿,以及随机抽取的视力正常的对照受试者样本,在一个月后被邀请进行睫状肌麻痹视网膜检影、重复无睫状肌麻痹的电脑验光和视光学检查。

结果

在接受筛查的5142名婴儿中,有514名有聚焦异常或视光学问题(阳性)。其中439名阳性婴儿和284名视力正常的对照受试者(阴性)参加了随访。59.0%的阳性病例被确诊有屈光或视光学疾病,而96.8%的阴性病例婴儿被确诊正常。根据随访中所见婴儿在总体中所占比例进行调整后,筛查程序的敏感性计算为0.67,特异性为0.96。详细结果根据筛查时检测到的不同情况(远、近、屈光参差性聚焦和视光学异常)、筛查时最大轴的分布,以及初次电脑验光与重复电脑验光和睫状肌麻痹视网膜检影的比较来呈现。

结论

一种比睫状肌麻痹筛查更简单的无睫状肌麻痹筛查程序,成功地检测出了很大比例的患有明显屈光不正的婴儿,特别是那些患有明显远视的婴儿,而远视被认为是一个致斜视和致弱视的危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验