Hackenberg B, Horváth O N, Petachti M, Schult R, Yenigün N, Bannenberg P
Hautarztpraxis Dr. Siebenhaar, Bergstr. 18-20, 42651, Solingen, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland.
Hautarzt. 2020 May;71(5):374-379. doi: 10.1007/s00105-020-04561-y.
According to the current scabies guideline, topical treatment with permethrin 5% cream is the first-line therapy of common scabies in Germany. However, in the course of growing incidence of scabies in recent years there have been increasing numbers of reports of reduced efficacy in standard therapy.
To establish a better understanding for the efficacy of scabies therapy under practice conditions, a survey focusing on the first-line therapy with permethrin was conducted in dermatological hospitals, outpatient clinics and dermatology practices.
The postal survey addressed all dermatologically active physicians in Germany and queried diagnostic methods, the individual initial treatment, the estimated efficacy of permethrin therapy, the frequency and reasons for therapy failures under permethrin and the therapeutic approach in case of failure of the initial therapy.
The efficacy of permethrin was rated with 73% by 187 physicians. About 74% reported to treat initially with 5% permethrin cream. The most common reasons identified for treatment failure were application errors, lack of compliance and inadequate hygiene measures. Suspected diminished efficacy or development of resistance against permethrin and re-infestations were also mentioned. In the case of ineffectiveness of initial therapy, most clinicians opt for oral ivermectin, a repetition of permethrin therapy or a combination of both.
Although there are localized reports of decreased effectiveness of permethrin therapy, results of this survey point towards a persisting high efficacy of first-line standard treatment of scabies with permethrin 5% cream in Germany.
根据当前疥疮治疗指南,5%氯菊酯乳膏局部治疗是德国普通疥疮的一线治疗方法。然而,近年来随着疥疮发病率的上升,标准治疗效果降低的报告越来越多。
为了更好地了解实际情况下疥疮治疗的疗效,在皮肤科医院、门诊和皮肤科诊所开展了一项以氯菊酯一线治疗为重点的调查。
通过邮政调查向德国所有皮肤科执业医生发送问卷,询问诊断方法、个体初始治疗、氯菊酯治疗的估计疗效、氯菊酯治疗失败的频率及原因,以及初始治疗失败时的治疗方法。
187名医生对氯菊酯疗效的评价为73%。约74%的医生报告初始治疗使用5%氯菊酯乳膏。确定的治疗失败最常见原因是用药错误、依从性差和卫生措施不当。也提到了怀疑氯菊酯疗效降低或产生耐药性以及再次感染。当初始治疗无效时,大多数临床医生选择口服伊维菌素、重复氯菊酯治疗或两者联合使用。
尽管有局部报告称氯菊酯治疗效果下降,但本次调查结果表明,在德国,5%氯菊酯乳膏作为疥疮一线标准治疗方法的疗效仍然很高。