CHU Lille, Unité Fonctionnelle de Toxicologie, 59000, Lille, France.
University Lille, ULR 4483 - IMPECS - IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé, 59000, Lille, France.
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Jul;134(4):1339-1344. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02267-3. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
It is difficult to carry out toxicological investigations in biological samples collected from extensively decomposed bodies and to interpret obtained results as several pitfalls should be considered: redistribution phenomena, degradation of xenobiotics during the postmortem period, contamination by putrefaction fluids, and external contamination. This work aims to present two cases in order to illustrate and discuss these difficulties in this tricky situation. Case#1: the body of a 30-year-old woman was found in a wooded area (1 month after she has been reported missing by her family): hair and a femur section were sampled. Case#2: the decomposed corpse of a 52-year-old man was found in a ditch: hair and nails were sampled. After decontamination steps, toxicological investigations were performed using liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry detection methods. In case#1, the same drugs or metabolites (benzodiazepines, propranolol, tramadol, acetaminophen, paroxetine, and oxetorone) were detected in hair and in bone specimens. This result combination strongly suggests intakes close to the time of death for three of them (oxazepam, lormetazepam, and propranolol). In case#2, results of toxicological investigations in hair and nails [(hair/nail concentration in ng/mg) nordiazepam (1.12/1.06), oxazepam (0.113/0.042), zolpidem (0.211/< 0.01), hydroxyzine (0.362/< 0.01), and cetirizine (0.872/1.110)] were both consistent with several drug intakes but were not contributory to cause of death determination. In case of positive toxicological results in biological samples collected from extensively decomposed bodies (such as hair, bones, or nails), it is challenging to determine the time, and even more, the level of the dose of exposure(s).
从广泛腐烂的尸体中采集生物样本进行毒理学研究并解释所得结果具有一定难度,因为有几个陷阱需要考虑:再分布现象、死后阶段外来物质的降解、腐败液的污染和外部污染。本工作旨在通过两个案例说明并讨论这种棘手情况下的这些困难。案例#1:在树林中发现一名 30 岁女性尸体(其家人报告失踪 1 个月后):采集头发和股骨段进行分析。案例#2:在沟渠中发现一名 52 岁男性的腐烂尸体:采集头发和指甲进行分析。经过去污步骤后,采用液相色谱-高分辨率质谱和串联质谱检测方法进行毒理学研究。在案例#1 中,头发和骨标本中均检测到相同的药物或代谢物(苯二氮䓬类、普萘洛尔、曲马多、对乙酰氨基酚、帕罗西汀和奥昔酮)。这些结果强烈表明,其中三种药物(奥沙西泮、劳拉西泮和普萘洛尔)的摄入时间接近死亡时间。在案例#2 中,头发和指甲中的毒理学研究结果[(头发/指甲中的浓度(ng/mg):去甲西泮(1.12/1.06)、奥沙西泮(0.113/0.042)、唑吡坦(0.211/<0.01)、羟嗪(0.362/<0.01)和西替利嗪(0.872/1.110)]均与多次药物摄入一致,但对死因确定没有帮助。在广泛腐烂的尸体(如头发、骨头或指甲)中采集的生物样本中出现阳性毒理学结果时,确定暴露时间,甚至更难确定剂量水平。