Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2020 Sep;30(6):e02116. doi: 10.1002/eap.2116. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Microclimatic conditions change dramatically as forests age and impose strong filters on community assembly during succession. Light availability is the most limiting environmental factor in tropical wet forest succession; by contrast, water availability is predicted to strongly influence tropical dry forest (TDF) successional dynamics. While mechanisms underlying TDF successional trajectories are not well understood, observational studies have demonstrated that TDF communities transition from being dominated by species with conservative traits to species with acquisitive traits, the opposite of tropical wet forest. Determining how functional traits predict TDF tree species' responses to changing environmental conditions could elucidate mechanisms underlying tree performance during TDF succession. We implemented a 6-ha restoration experiment on a degraded Vertisol in Costa Rica to determine (1) how TDF tree species with different resource-use strategies performed along a successional gradient and (2) how ecophysiological functional traits correlated with tree performance in simulated successional stages. We used two management treatments to simulate distinct successional stages including: clearing all remnant vegetation (early-succession), or interplanting seedlings with no clearing (mid-succession). We crossed these two management treatments (cleared/interplanted) with two species mixes with different resource-use strategies (acquisitive/conservative) to examine their interaction. Overall seedling survival after 2 yr was low, 15.1-26.4% in the four resource-use-strategy × management-treatment combinations, and did not differ between the management treatments or resource-use-strategy groups. However, seedling growth rates were dramatically higher for all species in the cleared treatment (year 1, 69.1% higher; year 2, 143.3% higher) and defined resource-use strategies had some capacity to explain seedling performance. Overall, ecophysiological traits were better predictors of species' growth and survival than resource-use strategies defined by leaf and stem traits such as specific leaf area. Moreover, ecophysiological traits related to water use had a stronger influence on seedling performance in the cleared, early-successional treatment, indicating that the influence of microclimatic conditions on tree survival and growth shifts predictably during TDF succession. Our findings suggest that ecophysiological traits should be explicitly considered to understand shifts in TDF functional composition during succession and that using these traits to design species mixes could greatly improve TDF restoration outcomes.
随着森林的老化,微气候条件会发生剧烈变化,并在演替过程中对群落组装施加强烈的过滤作用。光可用性是热带湿润林演替中最受限制的环境因素;相比之下,水可用性预计将强烈影响热带干旱林(TDF)的演替动态。虽然 TDF 演替轨迹的机制尚不清楚,但观察研究表明,TDF 群落从以具有保守特征的物种为主导转变为以具有获取特征的物种为主导,与热带湿润林相反。确定功能特征如何预测 TDF 树种对环境条件变化的反应,可以阐明 TDF 演替过程中树木表现的机制。我们在哥斯达黎加的一个退化的变性土上实施了一个 6 公顷的恢复实验,以确定:(1)具有不同资源利用策略的 TDF 树种在演替梯度上的表现如何;(2)生态生理功能特征如何与模拟演替阶段的树木表现相关。我们使用两种管理处理来模拟不同的演替阶段,包括:清除所有残余植被(早期演替),或不清除而间种幼苗(中期演替)。我们将这两种管理处理(清除/间种)与具有不同资源利用策略(获取/保守)的两种物种混合交叉,以检查它们的相互作用。两年后,幼苗的总体存活率较低,在四个资源利用策略×管理处理组合中为 15.1-26.4%,且在管理处理或资源利用策略组之间没有差异。然而,在清除处理中,所有物种的幼苗生长速度都显著提高(第 1 年高 69.1%,第 2 年高 143.3%),并且定义的资源利用策略有一定能力来解释幼苗的表现。总的来说,生态生理特征比叶片和茎特征(如比叶面积)定义的资源利用策略更好地预测物种的生长和存活。此外,与水分利用有关的生态生理特征对清除、早期演替处理中的幼苗表现有更强的影响,这表明微气候条件对树木存活和生长的影响在 TDF 演替过程中可预测地发生变化。我们的研究结果表明,在理解 TDF 功能组成在演替过程中的变化时,应明确考虑生态生理特征,并且使用这些特征来设计物种混合可以极大地提高 TDF 恢复的效果。