UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK.
Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Laver Building, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 2;378(1867):20210090. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0090. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Current policy is driving renewed impetus to restore forests to return ecological function, protect species, sequester carbon and secure livelihoods. Here we assess the contribution of tree planting to ecosystem restoration in tropical and sub-tropical Asia; we synthesize evidence on mortality and growth of planted trees at 176 sites and assess structural and biodiversity recovery of co-located actively restored and naturally regenerating forest plots. Mean mortality of planted trees was 18% 1 year after planting, increasing to 44% after 5 years. Mortality varied strongly by site and was typically 20% higher in open areas than degraded forest, with height at planting positively affecting survival. Size-standardized growth rates were negatively related to species-level wood density in degraded forest and plantations enrichment settings. Based on community-level data from 11 landscapes, active restoration resulted in faster accumulation of tree basal area and structural properties were closer to old-growth reference sites, relative to natural regeneration, but tree species richness did not differ. High variability in outcomes across sites indicates that planting for restoration is potentially rewarding but risky and context-dependent. Restoration projects must prepare for and manage commonly occurring challenges and align with efforts to protect and reconnect remaining forest areas. The abstract of this article is available in Bahasa Indonesia in the electronic supplementary material. This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'.
当前的政策正在为恢复森林以恢复生态功能、保护物种、固碳和保障生计注入新的动力。在这里,我们评估了植树造林对热带和亚热带亚洲生态系统恢复的贡献;我们综合了 176 个地点种植树木的死亡率和生长情况的证据,并评估了同时进行的主动恢复和自然再生森林样地的结构和生物多样性恢复情况。种植树木的死亡率在种植后 1 年为 18%,5 年后增加到 44%。死亡率因地点而异,在开阔地区比退化森林高 20%,种植高度对成活率有积极影响。在退化森林和人工林种植丰度设置中,标准化大小的生长率与物种水平的木材密度呈负相关。基于 11 个景观的群落水平数据,与自然再生相比,主动恢复导致树木基面积更快地积累,结构特性更接近原始森林参考点,但树种丰富度没有差异。由于地点之间的结果存在很大的差异,因此种植用于恢复可能有回报,但具有风险和依赖于背景。恢复项目必须为常见的挑战做好准备并加以管理,并与保护和重新连接剩余森林区域的努力保持一致。本文的摘要可在电子补充材料中的印度尼西亚语中获得。本文是主题为“了解森林景观恢复:加强生态系统恢复联合国十年的科学基础”的一部分。