Freides D, Tupler L A, Hall J M, Fowler T E
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Brain Cogn. 1988 Dec;8(3):409-20. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90061-9.
In studies of college students, normal children at three grades, and learning-disabled children, physical and nominal matching procedures were highly correlated, (range .72-.96). In each instance, expected time differences favoring physical matches were replicated. Comparable results were found with both tachistoscopic and paper-and-pencil methods. In two studies where relevant data were available, correlations were not significantly attenuated when the effects of motor speed were partialled out. The results challenge the premise that nominal and physical matching measures are empirically independent, invalidate their application as measures of independent types of information processing, and help explain inconsistent findings in hemispheric specialization research.
在对大学生、三个年级的正常儿童以及学习障碍儿童的研究中，实物匹配和名称匹配程序高度相关（范围为0.72 - 0.96）。在每个案例中，有利于实物匹配的预期时间差异都得到了重复验证。使用速示器和纸笔方法都得到了类似的结果。在两项有相关数据的研究中，当排除运动速度的影响时，相关性并未显著减弱。这些结果挑战了名称匹配和实物匹配测量在经验上相互独立的前提，使它们作为独立信息处理类型测量的应用无效，并有助于解释半球特化研究中不一致的发现。
