Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 477, Tomari, Asahimachi, Shimo-Niikawa-gun, Toyama, 939-0798, Japan.
Department of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2020 Jul;38(4):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01093-2. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
Only a few large-scale studies have examined the care gap in Japan. The present study aims to examine the care gap for secondary fracture prevention.
Changes in the rates of bone mineral density testing (test rate) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy administration (treatment rate) before and after hip and vertebral fracture registration were examined based on medical insurance data from the medical care system for elderly individuals in Hokkaido, Japan, issued from July 2013 to December 2018.
The hip fracture group comprised 18,258 women and 4162 men, whereas the vertebral fracture group comprised 34,907 women and 9958 men. Test rates were 0.2% and 1.4% prior to fracture registration (pre-registration) and 19.9% and 40.5% after fracture registration (post-registration) in the hip and vertebral fracture groups, respectively. Moreover, pre-registration treatment rates were 18.3% and 28.2% and post-registration rates were 32.7% and 61.0% in the hip and vertebral fracture groups, respectively. The vertebral fracture group had a significantly higher post-registration test and treatment rates than the hip fracture group. Moreover, the post-registration test and treatment rates in the hip fracture group tended to increase over the years. Both fracture groups showed a tendency for decreased post-registration test and treatment rates as age increased, with lower rates observed among men.
Test and treatment rates after hip fracture registration remain lower compared with those after vertebral fracture registration. To bridge the care gap following fractures, medical professionals need better awareness regarding osteoporosis treatment for hip fractures among elderly individuals and males.
仅有少数几项大规模研究调查了日本的护理差距。本研究旨在调查继发性骨折预防的护理差距。
根据日本北海道老年人医疗保健系统的医疗保险数据,检查了髋部和椎体骨折登记前后骨密度检测(检测率)和骨质疏松症药物治疗管理(治疗率)的变化。
髋部骨折组包括 18258 名女性和 4162 名男性,而椎体骨折组包括 34907 名女性和 9958 名男性。髋部和椎体骨折组在骨折登记前(登记前)的检测率分别为 0.2%和 1.4%,骨折登记后(登记后)的检测率分别为 19.9%和 40.5%。此外,髋部和椎体骨折组的登记前治疗率分别为 18.3%和 28.2%,登记后治疗率分别为 32.7%和 61.0%。椎体骨折组的登记后检测和治疗率明显高于髋部骨折组。此外,髋部骨折组的登记后检测和治疗率随着时间的推移呈上升趋势。两个骨折组的登记后检测和治疗率均随年龄的增长而呈下降趋势,男性的比率较低。
与椎体骨折登记后的检测和治疗率相比,髋部骨折登记后的检测和治疗率仍然较低。为了弥合骨折后的护理差距,医疗保健专业人员需要更好地了解老年男性髋部骨折的骨质疏松症治疗。