Independent Researcher, Chiclayo, Peru.
Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Peru.
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Mar;49:102321. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102321. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
The use of acupuncture to treat depression is not uncommon. However, recommendations regarding acupuncture issued by clinical practice guidelines (CPG) vary widely.
To describe the recommendations regarding acupuncture in CPGs for depression in adults, and to assess the methodology used to reach them.
We conducted a scoping review of CPGs for depression management in adults, which performed systematic reviews (SRs) to answer their review questions, were published between January 2014 and May 2018, and assessed the use of acupuncture as a review question. We limited out search to articles published in English/Spanish. We assessed the SRs quality using the "A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2" (AMSTAR-2), and described how the recommendation regarding acupuncture was reached.
We found five CPGs that fulfilled our inclusion criteria: three from the US, one from Canada, and one from China. Four CPGs fulfilled between two and three items of AMSTAR-2, and one CPG fulfilled seven items. The methodology used to formulate the recommendations varied between CPGs. Regarding acupuncture use recommendations: three CPGs did not issue any recommendation (although one mentions that it should not be used), whilst two were in favor.
The lack of a clearly stated review question presented in the majority of CPGs prevents the reader from understanding what the CPG developing group was trying to answer. Moreover, the arguments presented to support a decision are usually not detailed enough. Therefore, the assessment of the recommendations was extremely difficult.
Given that the formulation of recommendations is not always reliable, clinicians should carefully read and assess the recommendations presented in CPGs before implementing them.
针刺治疗抑郁症并不少见。然而,临床实践指南(CPG)中关于针刺的建议差异很大。
描述成人抑郁症 CPG 中关于针刺的建议,并评估达成这些建议所使用的方法。
我们对成人抑郁症管理的 CPG 进行了范围综述,这些 CPG 进行了系统评价(SR)以回答其审查问题,发表于 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月之间,并评估了针刺的使用作为审查问题。我们将搜索范围限制在以英语/西班牙语发表的文章。我们使用“评估系统评价的测量工具-2”(AMSTAR-2)评估了 SR 的质量,并描述了如何达成关于针刺的建议。
我们发现了符合纳入标准的五个 CPG:三个来自美国,一个来自加拿大,一个来自中国。四个 CPG 符合 AMSTAR-2 的两到三个项目,一个 CPG 符合七个项目。达成建议的方法在 CPG 之间有所不同。关于针刺使用建议:三个 CPG 没有提出任何建议(尽管有一个提到不应使用),而两个则赞成。
大多数 CPG 中缺乏明确规定的审查问题,使得读者无法理解 CPG 制定小组试图回答的问题。此外,支持决策的论点通常不够详细。因此,评估建议极其困难。
鉴于建议的制定并不总是可靠的,临床医生在实施 CPG 中的建议之前,应仔细阅读和评估这些建议。