• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳蜗长度与先天性感觉神经性听力损失的关系:初步数据。

Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Int Adv Otol. 2021 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7863.

DOI:10.5152/iao.2020.7863
PMID:32147598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7901413/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study used the data from patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss (CSNHL) and those with normal hearing to measure and compare the length of the cochlea with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HRCT images of patients who were diagnosed with CSNHL and were candidates for cochlear implantation were evaluated retrospectively. Sixty-three ears of 33 patients were included in the study. The control group comprised 66 ears of 33 individuals. The measurements were conducted by an experienced radiologist, using three-dimensional curved multiplanar reconstruction. All the measurements were performed thrice, and the average was calculated.

RESULTS

The data were distributed normally. The lengths of the cochlear components for the CSNHL and control groups were as follows: basal turn 21.66±1.01 (21.30-22.02) and 22.57±0.68 (22.32-22.81) mm, middle turn 11.58±0.69 (11.34-11.83) and 12.39±0.46 (12.23-12.56) mm, and apical turn 6.45±0.92 (6.12-6.77) and 7.12±0.65 (6.89-7.35) mm, respectively. The mean cochlear lateral wall (LW) length was significantly shorter in the CSNHL patients [39.71±1.32 (39.25-40.18) mm] than in the controls [42.09±1.17 (41.67-42.51) mm], (p<0.001). The intra-rater reliability was 0.878 (confidence interval 95%: 0.841-0.908 p<0.001). The cut-off value was 40.81 mm (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.94, and accuracy: 0.90).

CONCLUSION

There were microanatomic dissimilarities between the length of the cochlea in subjects from the CSNHL group and those from the control group.

摘要

目的

本研究利用先天性感觉神经性听力损失(CSNHL)患者和听力正常患者的数据,通过高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)来测量和比较耳蜗长度。

材料和方法

回顾性评估了被诊断为 CSNHL 并需要进行人工耳蜗植入的患者的 HRCT 图像。共纳入 33 名患者的 63 只耳朵作为研究组,纳入 33 名个体的 66 只耳朵作为对照组。由一位经验丰富的放射科医生使用三维曲面多平面重建进行测量。所有测量均进行 3 次,取平均值。

结果

数据呈正态分布。CSNHL 组和对照组的耳蜗各部位长度如下:底回 21.66±1.01(21.30-22.02)和 22.57±0.68(22.32-22.81)mm,中回 11.58±0.69(11.34-11.83)和 12.39±0.46(12.23-12.56)mm,顶回 6.45±0.92(6.12-6.77)和 7.12±0.65(6.89-7.35)mm。CSNHL 患者的耳蜗外侧壁(LW)长度平均值明显短于对照组[39.71±1.32(39.25-40.18)mm],差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。内部观察者信度为 0.878(置信区间 95%:0.841-0.908,p<0.001)。截断值为 40.81mm(敏感性:0.91,特异性:0.94,准确性:0.90)。

结论

CSNHL 组和对照组患者的耳蜗长度存在微小的解剖学差异。

相似文献

1
Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.耳蜗长度与先天性感觉神经性听力损失的关系:初步数据。
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7863.
2
Surgical anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation.与人工耳蜗植入相关的人类耳蜗底转的手术解剖学
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):323-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000371.
3
Radiological measurement of cochlear dimensions in cochlear hypoplasia and its effect on cochlear implant selection.耳蜗发育不全的耳蜗尺寸放射学测量及其对人工耳蜗选择的影响。
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Jun;135(6):501-507. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121000979. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Impingement of the carotid canal on the basal turn of the cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation.与人工耳蜗植入相关的耳蜗底转对颈动脉管的压迫
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1746-51. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000471.
5
Proportion of bony cochlear nerve canal anomalies in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children.儿童单侧感音神经性听力损失中骨蜗神经管异常的比例。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Apr;77(4):530-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
6
Endoscopic cochlear implantation: Call for caution.内镜下人工耳蜗植入:需谨慎行事。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):689-92. doi: 10.1002/lary.25462. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
7
Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice.耳蜗大小变异性及其在临床实践中的意义。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014 Feb;34(1):42-9.
8
Cochlear Implantation in Children with Cochlear Malformation.耳蜗畸形儿童的人工耳蜗植入
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;77:7-11. doi: 10.1159/000441859. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) Syndrome.大前庭导水管(EVA)综合征患者的双侧序贯人工耳蜗植入
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Feb;37(2):e96-103. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000925.
10
Congenital aplasia of the semicircular canals.先天性半规管发育不全
Otol Neurotol. 2003 May;24(3):437-46. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200305000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
Cochlear duct length in Pakistani cochlear implant recipients gender, age and side association: A Radiological Measure.巴基斯坦人工耳蜗植入受者的蜗管长度与性别、年龄及植入侧的相关性:一项影像学测量
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):41-45. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7426.
2
The Cochlear Size Variations in Incomplete Partitions with Multiplanar Images on Pediatric Temporal Bone CT.小儿颞骨CT多平面图像上不完全分隔的耳蜗大小变异
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2023 Sep 29;57(3):426-433. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2023.65725. eCollection 2023.
3
Cochlear coverage with lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays affects post-operative speech recognition.外侧壁耳蜗植入电极阵列的耳蜗覆盖范围影响术后言语识别。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 12;18(7):e0287450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287450. eCollection 2023.
4
Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?MRI 测量 3D 耳蜗管长度:准确性和可靠性如何?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Nov;42(11):2016-2022. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7287. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Comment on "The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes".关于《耳蜗大小对人工耳蜗植入效果的影响》的评论
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 29;2020:5674547. doi: 10.1155/2020/5674547. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Cochlear duct length along the outer wall vs organ of corti: Which one is relevant for the electrode array length selection and frequency mapping using Greenwood function?沿外壁的蜗管长度与柯蒂氏器:哪一个与使用格林伍德函数选择电极阵列长度和频率映射相关?
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec 29;5(2):117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.09.004. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
A Novel Method for Clinical Cochlear Duct Length Estimation toward Patient-Specific Cochlear Implant Selection.一种用于临床耳蜗管长度估计以进行个性化人工耳蜗选择的新方法。
OTO Open. 2018 Oct 2;2(4):2473974X18800238. doi: 10.1177/2473974X18800238. eCollection 2018 Oct-Dec.
3
Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges.基于解剖学指征范围的外侧壁耳蜗植入电极的患者特异性选择。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206435. eCollection 2018.
4
On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.关于计算机断层扫描图像中蜗管长度测量的准确性
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1077-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4930-7. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
Measuring cochlear duct length in Asian population: worth giving a thought!测量亚洲人群的蜗管长度:值得思考!
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;275(3):725-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4868-9. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
6
An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.人工耳蜗电极阵列设计概述。
Hear Res. 2017 Dec;356:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations.内耳畸形的分类及当前管理。
Balkan Med J. 2017 Sep 29;34(5):397-411. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0367. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
Spiral Form of the Human Cochlea Results from Spatial Constraints.人类耳蜗的螺旋形态源于空间限制。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 8;7(1):7500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07795-4.
9
Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length Computations Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging.使用同步辐射相衬成像评估蜗管长度计算
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):e92-e99. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001410.
10
Automated analysis of human cochlea shape variability from segmented μCT images.基于分割 μCT 图像的人类耳蜗形态变异性的自动分析。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017 Jul;59:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 12.