Suppr超能文献

评估使用优化和连续的消融灶进行射频肺静脉隔离时的更高功率输送。

Evaluation of higher power delivery during RF pulmonary vein isolation using optimized and contiguous lesions.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.

Department of Cardiology, Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1091-1098. doi: 10.1111/jce.14438. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

AIMS

"CLOSE"-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is based on contiguous (≤6 mm) and optimized radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions (ablation index [AI] ≥ 400 posteriorly and ≥ 550 anteriorly]. However, the optimal RF power to reach the desired AI is unknown. Therefore we evaluated the efficiency of an ablation strategy using higher power (40 W) during a first "CLOSE"-guided PVI.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive patients undergoing "CLOSE"-guided PVI for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were ablated with 40 W (group A). Results were compared with 105 consecutive patients enrolled in the "CLOSE to CURE"-study and were ablated using the same protocol with 35 W (group B).

RESULTS

In group A, ablation was associated with shorter ablation procedure time (91 vs 111 minutes; P < .001), shorter fluoroscopy time (5 vs 11 minutes; P < .001), shorter PVI time (48 vs 64 minutes; P < .001), shorter RF time (20 vs 28 minutes; P < .001), lower RF time per application (22 vs 29 seconds; P < .001), less RF applications (52 vs 58; P < .001), and less catheter dislocations (1 vs 2; P = .002). The impedance drop (12 vs 13 Ω; P = .192), first-pass isolation rate (99% vs 93%; P = .141) and acute reconnection rate (6% vs 4%; P > .733) were similar in both groups (groups A and B, respectively). No complications occurred. In group A, a gastroscopy-performed in five patients with esophageal temperature rise more than 42°C-did not reveal any esophageal lesion. Postprocedural recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year was not significantly different between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the "CLOSE"-protocol, increased power increases the efficiency of PVI without compromising patients' safety.

摘要

目的

“CLOSE”指导下的肺静脉隔离(PVI)基于连续(≤6mm)和优化的射频(RF)消融损伤(消融指数[AI]后部≥400,前部≥550)。然而,达到所需 AI 的最佳 RF 功率尚不清楚。因此,我们评估了在首次“CLOSE”指导下的 PVI 中使用更高功率(40W)的消融策略的效率。

方法

连续 80 例因症状性阵发性心房颤动接受“CLOSE”指导下 PVI 的患者接受 40W(A 组)消融。结果与在相同方案下接受 35W(B 组)消融的 105 例连续“CLOSE 到 CURE”研究患者进行比较。

结果

A 组中,消融与较短的消融程序时间(91 分钟与 111 分钟;P<.001)、较短的透视时间(5 分钟与 11 分钟;P<.001)、较短的 PVI 时间(48 分钟与 64 分钟;P<.001)、较短的 RF 时间(20 分钟与 28 分钟;P<.001)、每个应用程序的 RF 时间较短(22 秒与 29 秒;P<.001)、RF 应用程序较少(52 次与 58 次;P<.001)和较少的导管脱位(1 次与 2 次;P=.002)有关。两组间(A 组和 B 组)的阻抗下降(12Ω与 13Ω;P=.192)、初次通过隔离率(99%与 93%;P=.141)和急性再连接率(6%与 4%;P>.733)相似。两组均未发生并发症。A 组中,5 例因食管温度升高超过 42°C 而行胃镜检查的患者均未发现食管损伤。两组间 1 年时房性心动过速的复发率无显著差异。

结论

使用“CLOSE”方案,增加功率可提高 PVI 的效率,同时不影响患者的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验