Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者对改善病情抗风湿药物给药途径的偏好横断面调查:口服靶向药物与肠外生物制剂对比

A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.

作者信息

Edel Yonatan, Sagy Iftach, Pokroy-Shapira Elisheva, Oren Shirly, Dortort Lazar Ariela, Egbaria Mohammad, Shiber Shachaf, Tal Bat Sheva, Molad Yair

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Rabin Medical Center (Beilinson Campus), Petah Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Mar;22(3):154-159.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend initiation of parenteral biologic or oral target-specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who do not adequately respond to conventional DMARDs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the preferred route of administration of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs in RA patients who were previously treated with at least one type.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of consecutive RA patients previously prescribed bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. We analyzed the factors associated with patients' preferred route of administration.

RESULTS

The cohort included 95 patients, mostly female (72.6%), seropositive (81.05%), mean age 63.4 ± 11.9 years. The oral route was preferred by 39 patients (41%) and 56 (59%) preferred the parenteral route. Most patients (65.9%) preferred to continue with their current route (P < 0.001). Switching from a current route was less common with patients who were currently using the oral route (13.3% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.04). Many patients (53.8%) who preferred the oral route had never experienced it before, while this was rare (3.6%) regarding the parenteral route (P = 0.0001). Employment status was associated with preference of the subcutaneous route over the intravenous route of bDMARDs (P = 0.01). Of the 21 patients who had previously experienced both parenteral and oral treatment, 16 (76.2%) preferred the oral route.

CONCLUSIONS

RA patients preferred to continue treatment with an administration route they have already experienced. However, when choosing an unexperienced route, significantly more patients preferred the oral route. Our results strengthen the understanding of patient preferences, which could improve drug adherence, compliance, and disease outcome.

摘要

背景

指南建议,对于对传统改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)反应不佳的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者,应开始使用肠外生物制剂或口服靶向性疾病修正抗风湿药物(bDMARDs/tsDMARDs)。

目的

比较曾接受至少一种bDMARDs或tsDMARDs治疗的RA患者对其首选给药途径。

方法

对连续接受bDMARDs或tsDMARDs治疗的RA患者进行横断面调查。我们分析了与患者首选给药途径相关的因素。

结果

该队列包括95例患者,多数为女性(72.6%),血清学阳性(81.05%),平均年龄63.4±11.9岁。39例患者(41%)首选口服途径,56例(59%)首选肠外途径。大多数患者(65.9%)倾向于继续使用当前途径(P<0.001)。目前使用口服途径的患者较少从当前途径转换(13.3%对38.2%,P=0.04)。许多首选口服途径的患者(53.8%)此前从未使用过该途径,而对于肠外途径而言这一比例较低(3.6%)(P=0.0001)。就业状况与bDMARDs皮下途径优于静脉途径的偏好相关(P=0.01)。在21例曾接受过肠外和口服治疗的患者中,16例(76.2%)首选口服途径。

结论

RA患者倾向于继续使用他们已经体验过的给药途径进行治疗。然而,当选择未体验过的途径时,明显更多患者首选口服途径。我们的结果加强了对患者偏好的理解,这可能改善药物依从性、顺应性和疾病转归。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验