• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类风湿关节炎患者对改善病情抗风湿药物给药途径的偏好横断面调查:口服靶向药物与肠外生物制剂对比

A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.

作者信息

Edel Yonatan, Sagy Iftach, Pokroy-Shapira Elisheva, Oren Shirly, Dortort Lazar Ariela, Egbaria Mohammad, Shiber Shachaf, Tal Bat Sheva, Molad Yair

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Rabin Medical Center (Beilinson Campus), Petah Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Mar;22(3):154-159.

PMID:32147979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend initiation of parenteral biologic or oral target-specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who do not adequately respond to conventional DMARDs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the preferred route of administration of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs in RA patients who were previously treated with at least one type.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of consecutive RA patients previously prescribed bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. We analyzed the factors associated with patients' preferred route of administration.

RESULTS

The cohort included 95 patients, mostly female (72.6%), seropositive (81.05%), mean age 63.4 ± 11.9 years. The oral route was preferred by 39 patients (41%) and 56 (59%) preferred the parenteral route. Most patients (65.9%) preferred to continue with their current route (P < 0.001). Switching from a current route was less common with patients who were currently using the oral route (13.3% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.04). Many patients (53.8%) who preferred the oral route had never experienced it before, while this was rare (3.6%) regarding the parenteral route (P = 0.0001). Employment status was associated with preference of the subcutaneous route over the intravenous route of bDMARDs (P = 0.01). Of the 21 patients who had previously experienced both parenteral and oral treatment, 16 (76.2%) preferred the oral route.

CONCLUSIONS

RA patients preferred to continue treatment with an administration route they have already experienced. However, when choosing an unexperienced route, significantly more patients preferred the oral route. Our results strengthen the understanding of patient preferences, which could improve drug adherence, compliance, and disease outcome.

摘要

背景

指南建议,对于对传统改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)反应不佳的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者,应开始使用肠外生物制剂或口服靶向性疾病修正抗风湿药物(bDMARDs/tsDMARDs)。

目的

比较曾接受至少一种bDMARDs或tsDMARDs治疗的RA患者对其首选给药途径。

方法

对连续接受bDMARDs或tsDMARDs治疗的RA患者进行横断面调查。我们分析了与患者首选给药途径相关的因素。

结果

该队列包括95例患者,多数为女性(72.6%),血清学阳性(81.05%),平均年龄63.4±11.9岁。39例患者(41%)首选口服途径,56例(59%)首选肠外途径。大多数患者(65.9%)倾向于继续使用当前途径(P<0.001)。目前使用口服途径的患者较少从当前途径转换(13.3%对38.2%,P=0.04)。许多首选口服途径的患者(53.8%)此前从未使用过该途径,而对于肠外途径而言这一比例较低(3.6%)(P=0.0001)。就业状况与bDMARDs皮下途径优于静脉途径的偏好相关(P=0.01)。在21例曾接受过肠外和口服治疗的患者中,16例(76.2%)首选口服途径。

结论

RA患者倾向于继续使用他们已经体验过的给药途径进行治疗。然而,当选择未体验过的途径时,明显更多患者首选口服途径。我们的结果加强了对患者偏好的理解,这可能改善药物依从性、顺应性和疾病转归。

相似文献

1
A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.类风湿关节炎患者对改善病情抗风湿药物给药途径的偏好横断面调查:口服靶向药物与肠外生物制剂对比
Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Mar;22(3):154-159.
2
Adherence of rheumatoid arthritis patients to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional study.类风湿关节炎患者对生物制剂类改善病情抗风湿药的依从性:一项横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Oct;37(10):1709-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3758-6. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Comparisons between comorbid conditions and health care consumption in rheumatoid arthritis patients with or without biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a register-based study.类风湿关节炎患者使用或未使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药物时合并症与医疗保健消费的比较:一项基于登记的研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1354-7.
4
Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: optimizing therapy among different formulations. Current and emerging paradigms.类风湿关节炎中的甲氨蝶呤:不同制剂间的治疗优化。当前及新出现的模式。
Clin Ther. 2014 Mar 1;36(3):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
5
Adherence to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in adult patients with rheumatic diseases.风湿疾病成年患者对生物制剂改善病情抗风湿药物的依从性。
Therapie. 2021 Sep-Oct;76(5):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
A survey on the medication adherence to methotrexate among rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with self-administered biologic drugs.一项关于自我注射生物制剂治疗的类风湿关节炎患者对甲氨蝶呤药物依从性的调查。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Jul-Aug;34(4):694-7. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany.德国接受皮下生物制剂治疗的类风湿病(类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎)患者的治疗持续性。
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Effects of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on sarcopenia in spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物制剂和靶向合成的改善病情抗风湿药物对脊柱关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者肌少症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;42(4):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06454-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
9
Anti-nuclear antibody development is associated with poor treatment response to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.抗核抗体的产生与类风湿关节炎患者对生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗反应不良有关。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Oct;49(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
10
Impact of rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey: a questionnaire study.土耳其类风湿关节炎的影响:一项问卷调查研究。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):477-83. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical use of vedolizumab subcutaneous formulation in inflammatory bowel diseases: a review of real-world evidence.维多珠单抗皮下制剂在炎症性肠病中的临床应用:真实世界证据综述
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Aug 16;40(1):179. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04966-y.
2
Patient Satisfaction with Oral Testosterone Undecanoate in Men Who Received Prior Testosterone Therapy: An Open-Label, Single-Center Clinical Trial.接受过睾酮治疗的男性对十一酸睾酮口服制剂的满意度:一项开放标签、单中心临床试验
World J Mens Health. 2024 Oct;42(4):762-771. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230164. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3
Practical Primer Addressing Real-World Use Scenarios of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: Post Hoc Analyses of VISIBLE Studies.
解决皮下注射维多珠单抗在溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病中的实际应用场景的实用入门指南:VISIBLE研究的事后分析
Crohns Colitis 360. 2023 Aug 17;5(3):otad034. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otad034. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Safety Aspects and Rational Use of Testosterone Undecanoate in the Treatment of Testosterone Deficiency: Clinical Insights.十一酸睾酮治疗睾酮缺乏的安全性与合理应用:临床见解
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Mar 31;15:73-84. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S383130. eCollection 2023.
5
Projecting direct medical costs and productivity benefits of improving access to advanced therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a projection modelling study.预测改善类风湿关节炎高级治疗可及性的直接医疗成本和生产力效益:一项预测建模研究
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Feb 8;11(1):2173117. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2173117. eCollection 2023.
6
Patient preferences for atopic dermatitis medications in the UK, France and Spain: a discrete choice experiment.英国、法国和西班牙特应性皮炎药物的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 2;12(8):e058799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058799.
7
Re-Routing Infliximab Therapy: Subcutaneous Infliximab Opens a Path Towards Greater Convenience and Clinical Benefit.重新调整英夫利昔单抗治疗方案:皮下注射英夫利昔单抗为患者提供了更便捷和更有益的治疗选择。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Jun;42(6):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01162-6. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Results From the VISIBLE 2 Randomised Trial.皮下注射维得利珠单抗治疗中重度活动期克罗恩病的疗效和安全性:VISIBLE 2 随机试验结果。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Jan 28;16(1):27-38. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab133.
9
JATENZO®: Challenges in the development of oral testosterone.JATENZO®:口服睾酮研发面临的挑战。
Int J Impot Res. 2022 Nov;34(7):721-724. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00461-4. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Patient Preference for Treatment Mode of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 2020 Web-based Survey in Japan.类风湿关节炎患者对生物制剂治疗方式的偏好:2020年日本网络调查
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1095-1111. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00325-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5.