• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类风湿关节炎患者对生物制剂治疗方式的偏好:2020年日本网络调查

Patient Preference for Treatment Mode of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 2020 Web-based Survey in Japan.

作者信息

Kishimoto Mitsumasa, Yamairi Fumiko, Sato Noriko, Kobayashi Jun, Yamauchi Saori, Iwasaki Tomohisa

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.

Medical Intelligence Department, Ikuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1095-1111. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00325-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1007/s40744-021-00325-9
PMID:34089509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178669/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although the proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has increased steadily, the relationship between patient background and preference for bDMARDs has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey among patients aged ≥ 20 years with RA receiving bDMARDs. Participants were recruited through an internet research company in Japan. Study endpoints included factors affecting the preferred bDMARD treatment mode, namely, in-hospital intravenous infusion (infusion), in-hospital subcutaneous injection (in-hospital injection), or self-administered subcutaneous injection (self-injection), and discrepancies between the current and preferred treatment mode.

RESULTS

Of the 400 patients surveyed for preferred treatment mode, 15.3% preferred infusion, 18.0% preferred in-hospital injection, and 66.8% preferred self-injection. A preference for infusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.218 and 6.165) and in-hospital injection (OR 4.735 and 6.026) versus self-injection was significantly associated with higher current frequency of hospital visits and anxiety or other hurdles related to self-injection. A flexible administration setting was significantly associated with a preference for self-injection versus infusion (OR 0.401) and versus in-hospital injection (OR 0.445). Further, age (< 40 vs. ≥ 60 years) was significantly associated with a preference for self-injection versus in-hospital injection (OR 0.120). Many patients reported no discrepancy between their current and preferred treatment mode (patients receiving infusion, 68.0%; in-hospital injection, 71.2%; and self-injection, 94.0%). However, > 90% of patients responded that they would change their current mode in the future following a recommendation by a medical professional, aging, or a change in RA symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This web-based survey showed that patient preference for bDMARD treatment mode was significantly associated with age, frequency of hospital visits, flexible administration setting, and anxiety or other hurdles to self-injection. Changes in patient background which affect the preferred treatment mode should be considered in decision-making for RA therapy with bDMARDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

R000048089 (UMIN-CTR).

摘要

引言

尽管使用生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者比例稳步上升,但患者背景与bDMARDs偏好之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。

方法

我们对年龄≥20岁且正在接受bDMARDs治疗的RA患者进行了一项基于网络的问卷调查。参与者通过日本的一家互联网研究公司招募。研究终点包括影响首选bDMARD治疗方式的因素,即院内静脉输注(输液)、院内皮下注射(院内注射)或自我皮下注射(自我注射),以及当前治疗方式与首选治疗方式之间的差异。

结果

在400名接受首选治疗方式调查的患者中,15.3%的患者首选输液,18.0%的患者首选院内注射,66.8%的患者首选自我注射。与自我注射相比,对输液(优势比[OR]为2.218和6.165)和院内注射(OR为4.735和6.026)的偏好与当前较高的就诊频率以及与自我注射相关的焦虑或其他障碍显著相关。灵活的给药环境与相对于输液(OR为0.401)和院内注射(OR为0.445)而言对自我注射的偏好显著相关。此外,年龄(<40岁与≥60岁)与相对于院内注射而言对自我注射的偏好显著相关(OR为0.120)。许多患者报告他们当前的治疗方式与首选治疗方式之间没有差异(接受输液的患者为68.0%;院内注射的患者为71.2%;自我注射的患者为94.0%)。然而,超过90%的患者表示,在医学专业人员的建议、年龄增长或RA症状改变后,他们未来会改变当前的治疗方式。

结论

这项基于网络的调查显示,患者对bDMARD治疗方式的偏好与年龄、就诊频率、灵活的给药环境以及自我注射的焦虑或其他障碍显著相关。在使用bDMARDs进行RA治疗的决策中,应考虑影响首选治疗方式的患者背景变化。

试验注册

R000048089(UMIN-CTR)

相似文献

1
Patient Preference for Treatment Mode of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 2020 Web-based Survey in Japan.类风湿关节炎患者对生物制剂治疗方式的偏好:2020年日本网络调查
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1095-1111. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00325-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
2
Openness to and preference for attributes of biologic therapy prior to initiation among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: patient and rheumatologist perspectives and implications for decision making.类风湿关节炎患者在开始生物治疗之前对生物治疗属性的接受程度和偏好:患者和风湿病学家的观点及对决策的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jun 16;10:1079-90. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S107790. eCollection 2016.
3
A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.类风湿关节炎患者对改善病情抗风湿药物给药途径的偏好横断面调查:口服靶向药物与肠外生物制剂对比
Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Mar;22(3):154-159.
4
Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎中的生物难治性疾病:来自英国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎生物制剂注册处的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;77(10):1405-1412. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213378. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Physician Preferences and Variations in Prescription of Biologic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Register-Based Study of 4,010 Patients in Sweden.类风湿关节炎生物药物处方中的医生偏好与差异:基于瑞典4010名患者登记数据的研究
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;67(12):1679-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.22640.
6
Safety of abatacept compared with other biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from an observational study.与其他生物制剂和常规合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物相比,阿巴西普在类风湿关节炎患者中的安全性:来自观察性研究的数据。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jun 7;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1921-z.
7
Dose down-titration of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in daily clinical practice: Shared decision-making and patient treatment preferences in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.在日常临床实践中下调生物靶向改善病情抗风湿药物剂量:日本类风湿关节炎患者的共同决策和患者治疗偏好。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;22(11):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13692. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Tofacitinib for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis After the Failure of Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.托法替布治疗疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:NICE 单技术评估的循证评价组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0639-0.
9
Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.评估不列颠哥伦比亚省接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性在使用基于网络的调查问卷时参与者偏好和人口统计学特征的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 22;18(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5068.
10
Clinical predictors of multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者生物治疗多次失败的临床预测因素
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Dec 9;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02354-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economic evaluation of self-injection of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a Japanese real-world web-based survey.使用日本基于网络的真实世界调查对类风湿性关节炎患者自行注射生物制剂进行健康经济评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 21;25(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12908-1.
2
Persistence on subcutaneous tocilizumab as monotherapy or in combination with synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Greece (EMBRACE study): a multicenter, post-marketing, non-interventional, observational trial.希腊类风湿关节炎患者皮下注射托珠单抗单药治疗或联合合成改善病情抗风湿药的持续性研究(EMBRACE研究):一项多中心、上市后、非干预性观察性试验
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 May;43(5):1469-1478. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06916-5. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.类风湿关节炎患者对改善病情抗风湿药物给药途径的偏好横断面调查:口服靶向药物与肠外生物制剂对比
Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Mar;22(3):154-159.
Prescription Trends of Biologic DMARDs in Treating Rheumatologic Diseases: Changes of Medication Availability in COVID-19.生物性改善病情抗风湿药治疗风湿性疾病的处方趋势:COVID-19 期间药物可及性的变化
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 28;13(8):1199. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081199.
4
Demographic, Physical, and Psychological Determinants of Patient Experience with Subcutaneous Self-Injection in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.类风湿关节炎患者皮下自我注射患者体验的人口统计学、身体和心理决定因素:结构方程建模方法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 3;17:1551-1559. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S413871. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of patients with RA: a survey of rheumatologists in six European countries.2019冠状病毒病大流行对类风湿关节炎患者管理的影响:一项对六个欧洲国家风湿病学家的调查
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2022 Dec 13;7(1):rkac108. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac108. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of subcutaneous vs intravenous infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial.皮下注射与静脉注射英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效比较:一项随机 III 期临床试验的事后分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2838-2844. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac689.
7
Evaluating home injection compared with healthcare-setting injection of somatostatin analogs: a systematic literature review.评估家庭注射与在医疗保健环境中注射生长抑素类似物:系统文献回顾。
Endocrine. 2023 Mar;79(3):527-536. doi: 10.1007/s12020-022-03227-0. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Patient Preference for Self-Injection Devices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in China.类风湿关节炎患者对自我注射装置的偏好:一项在中国进行的离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 31;16:2387-2398. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S375938. eCollection 2022.
9
Preference of Orthopedic Practitioners Toward the Use of Topical Medicine for Musculoskeletal Pain Management in China: A National Survey.骨科医生对中国肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中局部用药的偏好:一项全国性调查。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2470-2479. doi: 10.1111/os.13446. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
10
Dupilumab and tezepelumab in severe refractory asthma: new opportunities.度普利尤单抗和泰泽佩尤单抗治疗重度难治性哮喘:新机遇
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 May 25;13:20406223221097327. doi: 10.1177/20406223221097327. eCollection 2022.