Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Aug;19(6):545-550. doi: 10.1177/1474515120911607. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Patients admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation have associated morbidity and mortality and incur significant costs. Data characterizing atrial fibrillation patients at high risk for readmission are scarce. We sought to inform this area by characterizing and categorizing unplanned readmissions of atrial fibrillation patients.
Retrospective data were abstracted from the charts of patients discharged from 2008 to 2012 after an index hospitalization for atrial fibrillation and referred to the nurse practitioner-led transitional care program, Bridging the Discharge Gap Effectively. Unplanned readmissions were dichotomized as early (⩽30 days) or late (31-180 days) and further classified as either "atrial fibrillation/atrial fibrillation-related" (AF/AF-related), "Cardiac; not AF/AF-related," or "Not cardiac-related." Case classifications were adjudicated by a senior cardiologist. Patient demographics and readmission characteristics were then compared.
Of 255 patients, 97 (38.0%) had unplanned readmissions within 180 days of discharge; 45 (46.4%) were early and 52 (53.6%) were late. Atrial fibrillation and cardiac causes accounted for 68.9% (=31) of early readmissions and 65.4% (=34) of late. Patients with late readmissions were more likely to have diabetes (32.7% . 17.7%, =.022) and higher CHADSVASc scores (3.63 . 2.98, =0.026) than those not readmitted. No other differences in baseline characteristics were seen within or between groups. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate in this sample was 17.6% (=45).
Readmissions following hospital discharge for atrial fibrillation are common; approximately 50% of these readmissions are for reasons unrelated to atrial fibrillation. In order to reduce atrial fibrillation-related readmissions, further research is needed to characterize predictors of readmission and to develop effective transitional care interventions.
因心房颤动住院的患者存在相关发病率和死亡率,并产生重大的费用。有关因心房颤动再入院风险高的患者的数据稀缺。我们通过对心房颤动患者的再入院情况进行描述和分类来了解这一领域。
从 2008 年至 2012 年期间索引为心房颤动的住院患者的病历中回顾性地提取数据,并将其转介给护士从业医师主导的过渡护理计划,即有效地弥合出院间隙。将无计划再入院分为早期(⩽30 天)或晚期(31-180 天),并进一步分为“心房颤动/与心房颤动相关”(AF/AF 相关)、“心脏;非 AF/AF 相关”或“非心脏相关”。病例分类由一名资深心脏病专家裁定。然后比较患者的人口统计学和再入院特征。
在 255 名患者中,97 名(38.0%)在出院后 180 天内发生了无计划再入院;45 名(46.4%)为早期,52 名(53.6%)为晚期。心房颤动和心脏原因占早期再入院的 68.9%(=31)和晚期再入院的 65.4%(=34)。晚期再入院的患者更有可能患有糖尿病(32.7%比 17.7%,=0.022)和更高的 CHADSVASc 评分(3.63比 2.98,=0.026)。两组患者在基线特征方面无其他差异。本样本的 30 天全因再入院率为 17.6%(=45)。
因心房颤动出院后的再入院很常见;其中约 50%的再入院与心房颤动无关。为了减少与心房颤动相关的再入院,需要进一步研究确定再入院的预测因素,并制定有效的过渡护理干预措施。