VU University Amsterdam.
Banyan Academy of Leadership in Mental Health.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;57(3):455-467. doi: 10.1177/1363461520909613. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
Exposure to violence, vulnerability due to lack of shelter, alienation due to stigma, the experiences of severe mental illness (SMI) and subsequent institutionalization, make homeless persons with SMI uniquely susceptible to trauma exposure and subsequent mental health consequences. This study aims to contribute to the development of culturally sensitive interventions for identifying and treating trauma in a population of homeless persons with SMI in Tamil Nadu, India by understanding the manifestations of trauma and its associated consequences in this population. Free-listing exercises followed by in-depth interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 26 user-survivors who have experienced homelessness or were at risk of homelessness, and suffered from SMI. Topics explored included events considered to be traumatic, pathways to trauma, associated emotional, physical and social complaints, and coping strategies. Results indicate discrepancies in classification of traumatic events between user-survivors and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Traumatic experiences, particularly relating to social relationships and poverty, mentioned by user-survivors did not match traditional conceptualizations of trauma. Positive coping strategies for trauma included being mentally strong, knowledge and awareness, whereas the main negative coping strategy is avoidance. User-survivors attributed their experiences of homelessness and SMI to past traumas. Differing views of trauma between user-survivors and mental health professionals can lead to misdiagnosis and under-recognition of trauma in this population of homeless persons with SMI.
暴露于暴力、缺乏庇护所导致的脆弱性、污名化导致的疏离感、严重精神疾病(SMI)的经历以及随后的住院治疗,使无家可归的 SMI 患者极易受到创伤暴露和随后的心理健康后果的影响。本研究旨在通过了解该人群中创伤的表现及其相关后果,为在印度泰米尔纳德邦的无家可归的 SMI 患者群体中制定具有文化敏感性的创伤识别和治疗干预措施做出贡献。通过便利抽样法对 26 名有过或有过无家可归经历且患有 SMI 的使用者幸存者进行了自由列表练习和深入访谈。探讨的主题包括被认为是创伤性的事件、创伤途径、相关的情绪、身体和社会投诉以及应对策略。结果表明,使用者幸存者和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》对创伤性事件的分类存在差异。使用者幸存者提到的创伤性经历,特别是与社会关系和贫困有关的经历,与传统的创伤概念并不匹配。应对创伤的积极策略包括心理强大、知识和意识,而主要的消极应对策略是回避。使用者幸存者将他们的无家可归和 SMI 经历归因于过去的创伤。使用者幸存者和心理健康专业人员对创伤的不同看法可能导致对这一无家可归的 SMI 患者群体中创伤的误诊和漏诊。