Singh Manoj Y, Vegunta Ramprasad, Karpe Krishna, Rai Sumeet
Department of Internal Medicine, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(1):38-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23322.
The study aimed to evaluate the effect of a single after-hours rapid response team (RRT) calls on patient outcome.
A retrospective cohort study of RRT-call data over a 3-year period.
A 600-bedded, tertiary referral, public university hospital.
All adult patients who had a single RRT-call during their hospital stay.
None.
The primary outcome was to compare all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were to study the hourly variation of RRT-calls and the mortality rate.
Of the total 5,108 RRT-calls recorded, 1,916 patients had a single RRT-call. Eight hundred and sixty-one RRT-calls occurred during work-hours (08:00-17:59 hours) and 1,055 during after-hours (18:00-7:59). The all-cause in-hospital mortality was higher (15.07% vs 9.75%, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.24-2.17, value 0.001) in patients who had an after-hours RRT-call. This difference remained statistically significant after multivariate regression analysis (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.11-2.01, value 0.001). We noted a lower frequency of hourly RRT-calls after-hours but were associated with higher hourly mortality rates. There was no difference in outcomes for patients who were admitted to ICU post-RRT-call.
Patients having an after-hour RRT-call appear to have a higher risk for hospital mortality. No causal mechanism could be identified other than a decrease in hourly RRT usage during after-hours.
Singh MY, Vegunta R, Karpe K, Rai S. Does the Time of Solitary Rapid Response Team Call Affect Patient Outcome? Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(1):38-43.
本研究旨在评估非工作时间单次快速反应小组(RRT)呼叫对患者结局的影响。
一项对3年期间RRT呼叫数据的回顾性队列研究。
一家拥有600张床位的三级转诊公立大学医院。
所有在住院期间有过单次RRT呼叫的成年患者。
无。
主要结局是比较全因住院死亡率。次要结局是研究RRT呼叫的每小时变化情况及死亡率。
在记录的5108次RRT呼叫中,1916例患者有过单次RRT呼叫。861次RRT呼叫发生在工作时间(08:00 - 17:59),1055次发生在非工作时间(18:00 - 7:59)。非工作时间进行RRT呼叫的患者全因住院死亡率更高(15.07% 对9.75%,比值比1.64,95%置信区间1.24 - 2.17,P值0.001)。多因素回归分析后,这种差异仍具有统计学意义(比值比1.50,95%置信区间1.11 - 2.01,P值0.001)。我们注意到非工作时间每小时RRT呼叫频率较低,但与每小时较高的死亡率相关。RRT呼叫后入住重症监护病房的患者结局无差异。
非工作时间进行RRT呼叫的患者似乎有更高的医院死亡风险。除了非工作时间每小时RRT使用量减少外,未发现其他因果机制。
Singh MY, Vegunta R, Karpe K, Rai S. 单次快速反应小组呼叫时间会影响患者结局吗?《印度重症监护医学杂志》2020;24(1):38 - 43。