Solomon Rose S, Corwin Gregory S, Barclay Dawn C, Quddusi Sarah F, Dannenberg Michelle D
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jun;11(6):438-45. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2554. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
In 2004, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 100,000 Lives Campaign recommended that hospitals implement rapid response teams (RRTs) charged with identifying non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for rapid deterioration. Although RRTs are now in widespread use, there have been conflicting results regarding the impact of RRTs on hospital mortality and cardiopulmonary arrest.
To assess the effectiveness of RRTs on reducing hospital mortality and non-ICU cardiopulmonary arrest rates.
We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE (1966-2014), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1898-2014), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1994-2014), and ClinicalTrials.gov (1997-2014) during October 2014. There were no constraints on language or publication status.
We included before-after studies, cohort studies, and cluster randomized trials that reported hospital mortality and/or non-ICU cardiopulmonary arrest for adults hospitalized in a non-ICU setting after the implementation of RRTs and/or medical emergency teams (METs). Data were extracted by 2 sets of 2 independent reviewers using a standardized data-collection form. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Authors were contacted to obtain any missing data.
Our search identified 691 studies, of which 30 met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Implementation of an RRT/MET was associated with a significant decrease in hospital mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.93, I(2) = 86%, 3,478,952 admissions) and a significant decrease in the number of non-ICU cardiac arrests (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69, I(2) = 71%, 3,045,273 admissions).
Implementation of an RRT/MET is associated with a reduction in both hospital mortality and non-ICU cardiopulmonary arrests. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:438-445. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.
2004年,医疗保健改进研究所的“拯救100000生命运动”建议医院组建快速反应小组(RRT),负责识别有快速病情恶化风险的非重症监护病房(ICU)患者。尽管RRT目前已广泛应用,但关于RRT对医院死亡率和心肺骤停的影响,结果存在矛盾。
评估RRT在降低医院死亡率和非ICU心肺骤停发生率方面的有效性。
2014年10月,我们使用MEDLINE(1966 - 2014年)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(1898 - 2014年)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(1994 - 2014年)和ClinicalTrials.gov(1997 - 2014年)进行了一项系统评价。对语言或发表状态没有限制。
我们纳入了前后对照研究、队列研究和整群随机试验,这些研究报告了在实施RRT和/或医疗急救团队(MET)后,非ICU环境中住院成人的医院死亡率和/或非ICU心肺骤停情况。数据由两组各两名独立审阅者使用标准化数据收集表提取。分歧由第三位审阅者解决。联系作者以获取任何缺失数据。
我们的检索共识别出691项研究,其中30项符合纳入分析的标准。实施RRT/MET与医院死亡率显著降低相关(相对危险度[RR]=0.88,95%置信区间[CI]:0.83 - 0.93,I² = 86%,3478952例入院患者),且非ICU心脏骤停数量显著减少(RR = 0.62,95% CI:0.55 - 0.69,I² = 71%,3045273例入院患者)。
实施RRT/MET与医院死亡率降低以及非ICU心肺骤停减少相关。《医院医学杂志》2016年;11:438 - 445。© 2016医院医学协会。