J Healthc Qual. 2020 May/Jun;42(3):122-126. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000256.
The decision to discharge versus admit a patient from the emergency department (ED) carries significant consequences to the patient and healthcare system.
We evaluated all ED visits at a single facility from January 1-December 31, 2015, where the ED provider initially requested admission to medicine; however, following medicine evaluation, the patient was discharged from the ED.
8.1% of medicine referrals resulted in discharge from the ED after referral for admission. 62.6% lacked documentation by medicine or another consulting service. Patients completed clinic follow-up within 7 or 30 days, 52.8% and 76.0% respectively. Emergency department revisit rates were similar for patients not referred versus referred for admission (8.0% vs. 8.1%, 13.3% vs. 14.6%, and 29.9% vs. 28.9% at 3, 7, and 30 days, respectively p-value > .05). Hospital admission during the follow-up period was also similar for these two groups (1.8% vs. 2.8%, 3.9% vs. 5.7%, and 11.3% vs. 15.0% at 3, 7, and 30 days, respectively p-value > .05).
Patients discharged from the ED after referral for medicine admission were not at significantly increased risk of subsequent ED revisit or hospital admission compared with nonreferred patients. This study illustrates the opportunity for collaboration between ED and medicine providers to refine disposition plans for patients who may fall into the "gray zone."
从急诊科(ED)出院或收治患者的决定对患者和医疗系统都有重大影响。
我们评估了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在一家医疗机构进行的所有 ED 就诊,其中 ED 提供者最初要求将患者收入内科治疗;然而,在内科评估后,患者从 ED 出院。
内科转科后,有 8.1%的患者从 ED 出院。62.6%的患者在内科或其他咨询服务中缺乏记录。患者在 7 天或 30 天内完成了诊所随访,分别为 52.8%和 76.0%。未转科和转科患者的 ED 复诊率相似(分别为 8.0%和 8.1%,3、7 和 30 天的分别为 13.3%和 14.6%,29.9%和 28.9%,p 值均>0.05)。在随访期间,这两组患者的住院率也相似(分别为 1.8%和 2.8%,3、7 和 30 天的分别为 3.9%和 5.7%,11.3%和 15.0%,p 值均>0.05)。
与未转科患者相比,内科转科收治的 ED 出院患者再次就诊或住院的风险无显著增加。本研究说明了 ED 和内科医生之间合作的机会,以完善可能处于“灰色地带”的患者的处置计划。