Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 17;15(9):2033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092033.
Studies in Europe have found that immigrants, compared to the local population, are more likely to seek out medical care in Emergency Departments (EDs). In addition, studies show that immigrants utilize medical services provided by EDs for less acute issues. Despite these observed differences, little is known about the characteristics of ED use by North African (NA) immigrants. The main objective of this study was to examine whether there were differences in ED discharge outcomes and psychiatric referrals between NA immigrants and Swiss nationals. A retrospective analysis was conducted using patient records from NA and Swiss adults who were admitted to the ED of the University Hospital in Bern (Switzerland) from 2013⁻2016. Measures included demographic information as well as data on types of admission. Outcome variables included discharge type and psychiatric referral. A total of 77,619 patients generated 116,859 consultations to the ED, of which 1.1 per cent ( = 1338) were consultations by NA patients. Compared to Swiss national patients, NA patients were younger, with a median age of 38.0 (IQR 28⁻51 years vs. 52.0 (IQR 32⁻52) for Swiss and predominantly male (74.4% vs. 55.6% in the Swiss). NA patient admission type was more likely to be "walk-in" or legal admission (7.5% vs 0.8 in Swiss,). Logistic regressions indicated that NA patients had 1.2 times higher odds (95% CI 1.07⁻1.40, < 0.003) of receiving ambulatory care. An effect modification by age group and sex was observed for the primary outcome "seen by a psychiatrist", especially for men in the 16⁻25 years age group, whereby male NA patients had 3.45 times higher odds (95% CI: 2.22⁻5.38) of having being seen by a psychiatrist. In conclusion differences were observed between NA and Swiss national patients in ED consultations referrals and outcomes, in which NA had more ambulatory discharges and NA males, especially young, were more likely to have been seen by psychiatrist. Future studies would benefit from identifying those factors underlying these differences in ED utilization.
欧洲的研究发现,与当地人口相比,移民更有可能到急诊部(ED)寻求医疗护理。此外,研究表明,移民利用急诊部提供的医疗服务来治疗不那么紧急的问题。尽管存在这些观察到的差异,但对于北非(NA)移民使用急诊部的特征知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是检查北非移民与瑞士国民在急诊部出院结局和精神科转诊方面是否存在差异。使用 2013 年至 2016 年期间伯尔尼大学医院急诊部收治的北非和瑞士成年患者的病历进行回顾性分析。测量指标包括人口统计学信息以及入院类型的数据。结果变量包括出院类型和精神科转诊。共有 77619 名患者产生了 116859 次到急诊部的就诊,其中 1.1%(=1338)为北非患者的就诊。与瑞士国民患者相比,北非患者年龄较小,中位数年龄为 38.0(IQR 28⁻51 岁),而瑞士国民为 52.0(IQR 32⁻52),且主要为男性(北非为 74.4%,瑞士为 55.6%)。北非患者的入院类型更可能是“走急诊”或合法入院(北非为 7.5%,瑞士为 0.8%)。逻辑回归表明,北非患者接受门诊治疗的可能性高 1.2 倍(95%CI 1.07⁻1.40,<0.003)。主要结局“接受精神科医生治疗”观察到年龄组和性别存在效应修饰,尤其是 16⁻25 岁年龄组的男性,其中男性北非患者接受精神科医生治疗的可能性高 3.45 倍(95%CI:2.22⁻5.38)。总之,北非和瑞士国民患者在急诊部就诊和转介结局方面存在差异,其中北非患者的门诊出院率更高,北非男性,尤其是年轻男性,更有可能接受精神科医生的治疗。未来的研究将受益于确定这些急诊利用差异背后的因素。