• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科非故意儿童中毒暴露:中毒控制中心转介与照顾者自行就诊的比较。

Unintentional Pediatric Poisoning Exposures in an Emergency Department: A Comparison of Poison Control Center Referrals and Caregiver Self-Referred Visits.

机构信息

Department of Systems Improvement, Primary Children's Hospital, Intermountain Healthcare.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1397-e1401. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002059.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002059
PMID:32149986
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients referred to a pediatric emergency department (ED) for unintentional poisoning exposures by a poison control center (PCC) compared with patients/caregivers who self-refer.

METHODS

The electronic data warehouse at a pediatric hospital was queried from October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015, for unintentional poisoning-related ED visits and subsequent inpatient admissions. Eligible patients aged 18 years and younger were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for pharmaceuticals, non-pharmaceuticalchemicals, fumes/vapors, foreign bodies, adverse food reactions, food poisoning, and bites/stings. Referral classification (PCC referral vs self-refer) was determined by PCC and hospital medical records.Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient demographics and ED visits by referral classification and age group. Simple and multiple logistic regression models examined the individual and combined impact of demographic and clinical characteristics on self-referral.

RESULTS

Of the 705 patients identified, 84.4% presented as caregiver/self-referred compared with PCC-referred. As compared with those who self-referred, a higher percentage of patients who contacted the PCC before ED presentation were white (93.9% [89.4-98.2%] vs 83.8% [80.7-86.7%]) and had commercial insurance (62.7% [51.5-69.5%] vs 53.0% [48.9-57.0%]). Pharmaceutical (71.9%) and chemical (14.0%) exposures were the most common exposure types for PCC-referred patients whereas foreign bodies (54.3%) were the most common for self-referred patients. The largest predictors of self-referral were age, insurance, and exposure type.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients presenting at 1 pediatric ED, disparities with PCC utilization exist among age groups, racial identification, and poison exposure type. Educational outreach interventions are needed to ensure optimal use of the PCC services by patients, caregivers, and health care professionals.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述由中毒控制中心(PCC)转介至儿科急诊部门(ED)的非故意中毒患者的人口统计学和临床特征,并与自行转介的患者/照护者进行比较。

方法

从 2014 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日,通过儿科医院的电子数据库,查询与非故意中毒相关的 ED 就诊和随后的住院病例。通过国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)药物、非药物化学品、烟雾/蒸气、异物、食物不良反应、食物中毒和咬伤/蜇伤的代码,确定年龄在 18 岁及以下的合格患者。参考分类(PCC 转介与自行转介)由 PCC 和医院病历确定。采用描述性统计方法,根据转介分类和年龄组描述患者的人口统计学和 ED 就诊特征。简单和多变量逻辑回归模型检查人口统计学和临床特征对自行转介的单独和综合影响。

结果

在 705 名患者中,84.4%为照护者/自行转介,而由 PCC 转介的患者占 15.6%。与自行转介的患者相比,在 ED 就诊前联系 PCC 的患者中,白人的比例更高(93.9%[89.4%-98.2%] vs. 83.8%[80.7%-86.7%]),商业保险的比例更高(62.7%[51.5%-69.5%] vs. 53.0%[48.9%-57.0%])。PCC 转介的患者最常见的中毒暴露类型是药物(71.9%)和化学物质(14.0%),而自行转介的患者最常见的中毒暴露类型是异物(54.3%)。自行转介的最大预测因素是年龄、保险和暴露类型。

结论

在就诊于 1 家儿科 ED 的患者中,在年龄组、种族识别和中毒暴露类型方面,与 PCC 使用相关的差异存在。需要开展教育外展干预措施,以确保患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员能够最佳利用 PCC 服务。

相似文献

1
Unintentional Pediatric Poisoning Exposures in an Emergency Department: A Comparison of Poison Control Center Referrals and Caregiver Self-Referred Visits.急诊科非故意儿童中毒暴露:中毒控制中心转介与照顾者自行就诊的比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1397-e1401. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002059.
2
Poison-related visits in a pediatric emergency department: A retrospective analysis of patients who bypass poison control centers.儿科急诊中毒相关就诊:绕过中毒控制中心的患者回顾性分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1554-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158418. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Emergency department poisoning visits in children younger than 6 years: comparing referrals by a regional poison control center to referrals by other sources.6岁以下儿童急诊科中毒就诊情况:比较地区中毒控制中心的转诊与其他来源的转诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c07a.
4
Toxicological exposures among the pediatric patients at a tertiary care center in Lebanon: the case for establishing a national poison center.黎巴嫩一家三级护理中心儿科患者的中毒暴露情况:建立国家中毒中心的必要性。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Sep;59(9):780-785. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1874404. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Outcomes of acute exploratory pediatric lithium ingestions.急性探索性儿童锂摄入的结果。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020 Sep;58(9):881-885. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1704772. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Study of Caregivers Regarding Pediatric Poisoning.关于儿童中毒的护理人员研究。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Sep;58(10):1072-1077. doi: 10.1177/0009922819863665. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Acute toxic exposures in children: analysis of a three year registry managed by a Pediatric poison control Center in Italy.儿童急性中毒暴露:意大利儿科中毒控制中心管理的三年登记研究分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Jun 2;47(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01071-y.
8
Methylphenidate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.哌甲酯中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Oct-Nov;45(7):737-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665175.
9
Tricyclic antidepressant poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.三环类抗抑郁药中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(3):203-33. doi: 10.1080/15563650701226192.
10
Can poison control data be used for pharmaceutical poisoning surveillance?中毒控制数据可用于药物中毒监测吗?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):225-31. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004317. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Toxicologic Exposures in California Emergency Departments in 2011 and Its Risk Factors.2011 年加利福尼亚州急诊科的毒物接触及其危险因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 22;22(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50452.