• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朝向谵妄生物标志物研究最佳实践方法:一项国际性改良德尔菲研究。

Toward best practice methods for delirium biomarker studies: An international modified Delphi study.

机构信息

IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Nursing Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;35(7):737-748. doi: 10.1002/gps.5292. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1002/gps.5292
PMID:32150303
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a serious and distressing neurocognitive condition common in people with advanced illness. The understanding of delirium pathophysiology is limited and largely hypothetical. To accelerate empirical understanding of delirium pathophysiology, robust scientific methods for conducting and reporting delirium biomarker studies are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to develop international consensus on the core elements of high-quality delirium biomarker studies.

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi survey was conducted from February to August 2019. Participants were international researchers experienced in conducting delirium studies from a range of settings (hospital, university, research centres). Round one commenced with open-ended questions developed from results from a prior systematic review and the REMARK (REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies) checklist. Responses were qualitatively analysed, and closed statements were developed. Participants then ranked the importance of these statements using a 5-point Likert scale in rounds 2 and 3. A priori consensus was defined as ≥70% participant agreement. Descriptive statistics for each item were computed including the mean Likert scores, SD and median participant scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight participants completed survey round one, 16 completed round two and 19 completed the final round. Consensus was achieved for a total of 60 items.

CONCLUSION

The Delphi survey identified items that expert researchers agreed were important in the conduct of delirium biomarker studies. These reporting items provide a strong platform for improved methodological quality and opportunities to synthesise future delirium biomarker studies.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种严重且令人痛苦的神经认知障碍,常见于晚期疾病患者。目前对谵妄病理生理学的认识有限,且大多是假设性的。为了加速对谵妄病理生理学的实证理解,迫切需要稳健的科学方法来进行和报告谵妄生物标志物研究。本研究旨在就高质量谵妄生物标志物研究的核心要素达成国际共识。

方法

我们进行了三轮改良 Delphi 调查,时间为 2019 年 2 月至 8 月。参与者为来自不同环境(医院、大学、研究中心)的具有丰富谵妄研究经验的国际研究人员。第一轮从先前系统评价和 REMARK(报告肿瘤标志物预后研究建议)检查表的结果中提出了开放性问题。对答复进行了定性分析,并制定了封闭陈述。然后,参与者在第二轮和第三轮中使用 5 分李克特量表对这些陈述的重要性进行了排名。事先定义的共识为≥70%的参与者达成一致。对每个项目进行了描述性统计,包括平均李克特得分、标准差和中位数参与者得分。

结果

共有 28 名参与者完成了第一轮调查,16 名完成了第二轮,19 名完成了最终轮。总共达成了 60 项共识。

结论

德尔菲调查确定了专家研究人员认为在进行谵妄生物标志物研究中重要的项目。这些报告项目为提高方法学质量和有机会综合未来的谵妄生物标志物研究提供了坚实的平台。

相似文献

1
Toward best practice methods for delirium biomarker studies: An international modified Delphi study.朝向谵妄生物标志物研究最佳实践方法:一项国际性改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;35(7):737-748. doi: 10.1002/gps.5292. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline.一项德尔菲调查,以确定循证实践教育干预措施应如何报告:报告指南制定的第二阶段。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 31;14:159. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-159.
3
Developing a set of emergency department performance measures to evaluate delirium care quality for older adults: a modified e-Delphi study.制定一套急诊科绩效评估指标,以评估老年人谵妄护理质量:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00947-6.
4
Requirements and expectations of high-quality biomarkers for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in 2021-a two-round Delphi survey among international experts.2021 年特应性皮炎和银屑病高质量生物标志物的要求和期望——国际专家两轮 Delphi 调查。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1467-1476. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18178. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Recommendations for older adults' physical activity and sedentary behaviour during hospitalisation for an acute medical illness: an international Delphi study.老年人在急性病住院期间身体活动和久坐行为的建议:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 May 25;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00970-3.
6
Consensus on the exercise and dosage variables of an exercise training programme for chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.慢性非特异性颈痛运动训练方案的运动和剂量变量共识:一项国际电子 Delphi 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e037656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037656.
7
Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists.基于共识的癌症幸存者神经病变足部护理推荐意见的制定(PodNICS):澳大利亚足病医生的 Delphi 共识研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 9;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00632-0.
8
Protocol for developing a set of performance measures to monitor and evaluate delirium care quality for older adults in the emergency department using a modified e-Delphi process.制定一套使用改良电子德尔菲法监测和评估急诊科老年患者谵妄护理质量的绩效指标的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 22;13(8):e074730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074730.
9
Consensus on the Terms and Procedures for Planning and Reporting a Usability Evaluation of Health-Related Digital Solutions: Delphi Study and a Resulting Checklist.健康相关数字解决方案可用性评估的规划和报告术语与程序共识:德尔菲研究和由此产生的清单。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e44326. doi: 10.2196/44326.
10
Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel.痴呆症共病健康状况的药物适宜性工具:多学科专家小组的共识建议
Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1189-1197. doi: 10.1111/imj.13215.

引用本文的文献

1
An Expert Consensus Statement on Biomarkers of Aging for Use in Intervention Studies.一份关于用于干预研究的衰老生物标志物的专家共识声明。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae297.
2
Characterizing and detecting delirium with clinical and computational measures of speech and language disturbance.使用言语和语言障碍的临床和计算测量来描述和检测谵妄。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Jul 4;48(4):E255-E264. doi: 10.1503/jpn.230026. Print 2023 Jul-Aug.
3
Identification of Digital Health Priorities for Palliative Care Research: Modified Delphi Study.
确定姑息治疗研究的数字健康优先事项:改良德尔菲研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Mar 21;5(1):e32075. doi: 10.2196/32075.
4
Postoperative delirium and its relationship with biomarkers for dementia: a meta-analysis.术后谵妄及其与痴呆生物标志物的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Apr;34(4):377-390. doi: 10.1017/S104161022100274X. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Delirium researchers' perspectives of the challenges in delirium biomarker research: A qualitative study.谵妄生物标志物研究中面临的挑战:一项定性研究——谵妄研究人员的观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0243254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243254. eCollection 2021.
6
A team approach to applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation set in clinical evaluation.团队方法在临床评估中应用国际功能、残疾和健康分类康复版。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 19;53(1):jrm00147. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2756.
7
A Systematic Review of Delirium Biomarkers and Their Alignment with the NIA-AA Research Framework.一项关于谵妄生物标志物及其与 NIA-AA 研究框架一致性的系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):255-263. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16836. Epub 2020 Sep 25.