Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 22;13(8):e074730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074730.
Older adults are at high risk of developing delirium in the emergency department (ED). Delirium associated with an ED visit is independently linked to poorer outcomes such as increased length of hospital stay and mortality. Performance measures (PMs) are needed to identify variations in the quality of delirium care to help focus improvement efforts where they are most needed. A preliminary list of 11 quality statements and 24 PMs was developed based on a synthesis of high-quality clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this study is to gain consensus on a subset of PMs that can be used to evaluate delirium care quality for older ED patients.
This protocol for a modified e-Delphi study is informed by the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies. Clinical experts from across Canada and internationally will be recruited through peer referral, professional organisations and social media calls for expressions of interest. A minimum of 17 participants will be recruited. The primary survey for each round will consist of closed-ended questions with the opportunity to provide comments to justify decisions and clarify understanding. Using 9-point Likert scales, participants will rate each quality statement according to the concepts of importance and actionability, then its associated PMs according to the concept of necessity. Results will be fed back to participants in subsequent rounds. A priori stopping criteria have been defined in terms of consensus and stability. A minimum of three rounds will be undertaken to allow participants to have feedback, revise previous responses, then stabilise responses.
Ethical approval was provided at the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (ID HS25728 (H2022:340)). Informed consent will be obtained electronically using the Research Electronic Data Capture secure online platform. Knowledge translation and dissemination will be done through traditional (eg, conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications) and non-traditional (eg, ED Grand Rounds) strategies.
老年人在急诊科(ED)发生谵妄的风险很高。与 ED 就诊相关的谵妄与较差的结局独立相关,例如住院时间延长和死亡率增加。需要使用绩效指标(PMs)来识别谵妄护理质量的差异,以帮助将改进工作重点放在最需要的地方。根据高质量临床实践指南的综合分析,制定了一份包含 11 项质量声明和 24 项 PM 的初步清单。本研究的目的是就一组可用于评估老年 ED 患者谵妄护理质量的 PM 达成共识。
本研究采用修改后的电子德尔菲法,该方法由《德尔菲研究的指导》提供信息。将通过同行推荐、专业组织和社交媒体征集对表达兴趣的邀请,在加拿大和国际范围内招募临床专家。将招募至少 17 名参与者。每轮的主要调查将包括封闭式问题,并提供评论机会,以证明决策的合理性并澄清理解。参与者将使用 9 分李克特量表根据重要性和可操作性概念对每个质量声明进行评分,然后根据必要性概念对其相关 PM 进行评分。结果将在后续轮次中反馈给参与者。根据共识和稳定性,预先定义了停止标准。将进行至少三轮,以使参与者有反馈、修改之前的回复,然后稳定回复。
曼尼托巴大学健康研究伦理委员会(ID HS25728 (H2022:340))提供了伦理批准。将通过 Research Electronic Data Capture 安全在线平台以电子方式获得知情同意。知识转化和传播将通过传统(例如会议演讲、同行评审出版物)和非传统(例如 ED 大查房)策略进行。