Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹治疗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)的体外抗病毒活性和优化剂量设计预测。

In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

机构信息

Drug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa237.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) first broke out in 2019 and subsequently spread worldwide. Chloroquine has been sporadically used in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hydroxychloroquine shares the same mechanism of action as chloroquine, but its more tolerable safety profile makes it the preferred drug to treat malaria and autoimmune conditions. We propose that the immunomodulatory effect of hydroxychloroquine also may be useful in controlling the cytokine storm that occurs late phase in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2. Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

The pharmacological activity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine was tested using SARS-CoV-2-infected Vero cells. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were implemented for both drugs separately by integrating their in vitro data. Using the PBPK models, hydroxychloroquine concentrations in lung fluid were simulated under 5 different dosing regimens to explore the most effective regimen while considering the drug's safety profile.

RESULTS

Hydroxychloroquine (EC50 = 0.72 μM) was found to be more potent than chloroquine (EC50 = 5.47 μM) in vitro. Based on PBPK models results, a loading dose of 400 mg twice daily of hydroxychloroquine sulfate given orally, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg given twice daily for 4 days is recommended for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as it reached 3 times the potency of chloroquine phosphate when given 500 mg twice daily 5 days in advance.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydroxychloroquine was found to be more potent than chloroquine to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.

摘要

背景

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)于 2019 年首次爆发,随后在全球范围内传播。氯喹曾被零星用于治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染。羟氯喹与氯喹具有相同的作用机制,但由于其更耐受的安全性,成为治疗疟疾和自身免疫性疾病的首选药物。我们提出,羟氯喹的免疫调节作用也可能有助于控制 SARS-CoV-2 危重症患者晚期发生的细胞因子风暴。目前,尚无证据支持羟氯喹用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染。

方法

使用感染 SARS-CoV-2 的 Vero 细胞测试氯喹和羟氯喹的药理学活性。通过整合其体外数据,分别为两种药物建立基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型。使用 PBPK 模型,模拟了 5 种不同给药方案下羟氯喹在肺液中的浓度,在考虑药物安全性的同时,探索最有效的给药方案。

结果

羟氯喹(EC50=0.72 μM)在体外比氯喹(EC50=5.47 μM)更有效。基于 PBPK 模型的结果,建议口服硫酸羟氯喹负荷剂量为 400 mg,每日 2 次,然后给予维持剂量 200 mg,每日 2 次,连用 4 天,因为在提前 5 天每天给予 500 mg,每日 2 次时,羟氯喹的效力达到了氯喹磷酸盐的 3 倍。

结论

体外实验发现羟氯喹比氯喹更能抑制 SARS-CoV-2。

相似文献

2
Insights into antiviral mechanisms of remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine affecting the new SARS-CoV-2.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Nov;131:110668. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110668. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
4
Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2.
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7826):588-590. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2575-3. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
In vitro testing of combined hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 shows synergistic effect.
Microb Pathog. 2020 Aug;145:104228. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104228. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
6
Safety considerations for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1276-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Advances in the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19.
Postgrad Med. 2020 Sep;132(7):604-613. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1778982. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
8
A review on possible modes of action of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine: repurposing against SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Aug;56(2):106028. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106028. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates.
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7826):584-587. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Degradation of IRAK4 for the treatment of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1609923. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1609923. eCollection 2025.
2
Nasal inhalation of antiviral microparticulate powders to target early infection of upper airways.
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01916-7.
4
Antimalarial compounds exhibit variant- and cell-type-specific activity against SARS-CoV-2 isolated in Panama.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1537053. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1537053. eCollection 2025.
5
[Recommendations for rheumatologists on pharmacological management during the COVID-19 health emergency: Expert group opinion].
Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2021 Apr-Jun;28(2):134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.rcreu.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Safety of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Prophylaxis in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79660. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79660. eCollection 2025 Feb.
10
Malabaricone C isolated from edible plants as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83633-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验