• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较根转录组学为鹰嘴豆(L.)的耐旱适应策略提供了新见解。

Comparative Root Transcriptomics Provide Insights into Drought Adaptation Strategies in Chickpea ( L.).

机构信息

The Pangenomics Group, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia.

Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Center of Excellence for Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 5;21(5):1781. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051781.

DOI:10.3390/ijms21051781
PMID:32150870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7084756/
Abstract

Drought adversely affects crop production across the globe. The root system immensely contributes to water management and the adaptability of plants to drought stress. In this study, drought-induced phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of two contrasting chickpea ( L.) genotypes were compared at the vegetative, reproductive transition, and reproductive stages. At the vegetative stage, drought-tolerant genotype maintained higher root biomass, length, and surface area under drought stress as compared to sensitive genotype. However, at the reproductive stage, root length and surface area of tolerant genotype was lower but displayed higher root diameter than sensitive genotype. The shoot biomass of tolerant genotype was overall higher than the sensitive genotype under drought stress. RNA-seq analysis identified genotype- and developmental-stage specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to drought stress. At the vegetative stage, a total of 2161 and 1873 DEGs, and at reproductive stage 4109 and 3772 DEGs, were identified in the tolerant and sensitive genotypes, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed enrichment of biological categories related to cellular process, metabolic process, response to stimulus, response to abiotic stress, and response to hormones. Interestingly, the expression of stress-responsive transcription factors, kinases, ROS signaling and scavenging, transporters, root nodulation, and oxylipin biosynthesis genes were robustly upregulated in the tolerant genotype, possibly contributing to drought adaptation. Furthermore, activation/repression of hormone signaling and biosynthesis genes was observed. Overall, this study sheds new insights on drought tolerance mechanisms operating in roots with broader implications for chickpea improvement.

摘要

干旱会对全球的作物生产产生不利影响。根系对植物的水分管理和适应干旱胁迫能力有重要贡献。在本研究中,比较了两个具有不同抗旱性的鹰嘴豆(L.)基因型在营养生长、生殖过渡和生殖阶段对干旱胁迫的表型和转录组响应。在营养生长阶段,耐旱基因型在干旱胁迫下保持较高的根生物量、长度和表面积,而敏感基因型则较低。然而,在生殖阶段,耐旱基因型的根长和表面积较低,但根直径比敏感基因型高。在干旱胁迫下,耐旱基因型的地上生物量总体上高于敏感基因型。RNA-seq 分析鉴定了基因型和发育阶段特异性的差异表达基因(DEGs)对干旱胁迫的响应。在营养生长阶段,耐旱和敏感基因型分别鉴定出 2161 个和 1873 个 DEGs,在生殖阶段分别鉴定出 4109 个和 3772 个 DEGs。GO 分析显示,与细胞过程、代谢过程、对刺激的反应、对非生物胁迫的反应和对激素的反应相关的生物学类别富集。有趣的是,在耐旱基因型中,应激响应转录因子、激酶、ROS 信号和清除、转运蛋白、根瘤和氧化脂生物合成基因的表达被强烈上调,这可能有助于其适应干旱。此外,还观察到激素信号和生物合成基因的激活/抑制。总之,本研究为根系中干旱耐受性机制提供了新的见解,对鹰嘴豆的改良具有更广泛的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/5e5fc00efc9a/ijms-21-01781-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b4f3a4cd8df1/ijms-21-01781-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b86ad0012a0f/ijms-21-01781-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/bb23a41dff76/ijms-21-01781-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/70de95296544/ijms-21-01781-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/f6b7c1df9a62/ijms-21-01781-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b685500b9ce2/ijms-21-01781-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/5e5fc00efc9a/ijms-21-01781-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b4f3a4cd8df1/ijms-21-01781-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b86ad0012a0f/ijms-21-01781-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/bb23a41dff76/ijms-21-01781-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/70de95296544/ijms-21-01781-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/f6b7c1df9a62/ijms-21-01781-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/b685500b9ce2/ijms-21-01781-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98db/7084756/5e5fc00efc9a/ijms-21-01781-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Root Transcriptomics Provide Insights into Drought Adaptation Strategies in Chickpea ( L.).比较根转录组学为鹰嘴豆(L.)的耐旱适应策略提供了新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 5;21(5):1781. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051781.
2
Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) between drought-tolerant and -susceptible genotypes of chickpea under terminal drought stress.比较分析在终末干旱胁迫下耐旱和易感基因型鹰嘴豆的表达序列标签(EST)。
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Apr 22;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-70.
3
Transcriptome analyses reveal genotype- and developmental stage-specific molecular responses to drought and salinity stresses in chickpea.转录组分析揭示了鹰嘴豆对干旱和盐胁迫的基因型及发育阶段特异性分子反应。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 13;6:19228. doi: 10.1038/srep19228.
4
RNA-Seq analysis revealed genes associated with drought stress response in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).RNA-Seq 分析揭示了与鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)干旱胁迫反应相关的基因。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199774. eCollection 2018.
5
Transcriptomic analysis of oxylipin biosynthesis genes and chemical profiling reveal an early induction of jasmonates in chickpea roots under drought stress.转录组分析氧化脂生物合成基因和化学特征表明,在干旱胁迫下鹰嘴豆根系中茉莉酸的早期诱导。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Dec;61:115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
6
A comprehensive resource of drought- and salinity- responsive ESTs for gene discovery and marker development in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).一种综合的干旱和盐胁迫响应 EST 资源,可用于发现菜豆(Cicer arietinum L.)基因和开发标记。
BMC Genomics. 2009 Nov 15;10:523. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-523.
7
Mechanisms of physiological adjustment of N2 fixation in Cicer arietinum L. (chickpea) during early stages of water deficit: single or multi-factor controls.鹰嘴豆(兵豆)在水分亏缺初期固氮的生理调节机制:单因素或多因素控制。
Plant J. 2014 Sep;79(6):964-80. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12599. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Characterization of ASR gene and its role in drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).ASR 基因的特征及其在鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)抗旱性中的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 14;15(7):e0234550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234550. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea and drought-sensitive chickpea .耐旱鹰嘴豆和干旱敏感鹰嘴豆之间的比较生理学和叶片蛋白质组分析
J Biosci. 2019 Mar;44(1).
10
The CarERF genes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and the identification of CarERF116 as abiotic stress responsive transcription factor.鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)中的 CarERF 基因及其作为非生物胁迫响应转录因子的鉴定。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2015 Jan;15(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s10142-014-0399-7. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Grain under pressure: Harnessing biochemical pathways to beat drought and heat in wheat.受压谷物:利用生化途径应对小麦干旱和高温问题
Plant J. 2025 Jun;122(6):e70253. doi: 10.1111/tpj.70253.
2
Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals key long noncoding RNAs for cadmium tolerance in Tibetan hull-less barley.比较转录组分析揭示了青稞镉耐受性的关键长链非编码RNA
Front Plant Sci. 2025 May 22;16:1572490. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1572490. eCollection 2025.
3
Index-Based selection of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for enhanced drought tolerance.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and its relationship with harvest index in the reference collection of chickpea germplasm.鹰嘴豆种质资源参考库中碳同位素分辨的变异及其与收获指数的关系。
Funct Plant Biol. 2013 Dec;40(12):1350-1361. doi: 10.1071/FP13088.
2
RNA-Seq analysis revealed genes associated with drought stress response in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).RNA-Seq 分析揭示了与鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)干旱胁迫反应相关的基因。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199774. eCollection 2018.
3
Out of Shape During Stress: A Key Role for Auxin.
基于指标筛选鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)基因型以提高耐旱性
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 10;15(1):8282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93273-1.
4
Advancing Chickpea Breeding: Omics Insights for Targeted Abiotic Stress Mitigation and Genetic Enhancement.推进鹰嘴豆育种:用于针对性缓解非生物胁迫和遗传改良的组学见解
Biochem Genet. 2025 Apr;63(2):1063-1115. doi: 10.1007/s10528-024-10954-8. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling of Root Tissue in Drought-Tolerant and Drought-Susceptible Wheat Genotypes in Response to Water Stress.转录组学和代谢组学分析干旱耐受和干旱敏感小麦基因型在水分胁迫下的根组织。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 27;25(19):10430. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910430.
6
From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits.从表型分析到遗传图谱构建:鉴定豆科植物根系性状对水分胁迫的适应机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05477-8.
7
Exogenous Sodium Nitroprusside Affects the Redox System of Wheat Roots Differentially Regulating the Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes under Short-Time Osmotic Stress.外源硝普钠影响小麦根系的氧化还原系统,在短期渗透胁迫下差异调节抗氧化酶的活性。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;13(14):1895. doi: 10.3390/plants13141895.
8
Metabolic and Transcriptional Analysis Reveals Flavonoid Involvement in the Drought Stress Response of Mulberry Leaves.代谢和转录分析揭示类黄酮参与桑树叶片的干旱胁迫响应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 6;25(13):7417. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137417.
9
A glutathione-independent DJ-1/Pfp1 domain containing glyoxalase III, OsDJ-1C, functions in abiotic stress adaptation in rice.一个谷胱甘肽非依赖的 DJ-1/Pfp1 结构域包含的甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶 III,OsDJ-1C,在水稻的非生物胁迫适应中发挥作用。
Planta. 2024 Mar 4;259(4):81. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04315-9.
10
Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting genotypes provides new insights into the drought response mechanism in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.).对两个具有显著差异基因型的比较转录组分析为豇豆(Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.)抗旱响应机制提供了新的见解。
Genes Genomics. 2024 Jan;46(1):65-94. doi: 10.1007/s13258-023-01460-z. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
压力下的变形:生长素的关键作用。
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Sep;23(9):783-793. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
RNA sequencing of leaf tissues from two contrasting chickpea genotypes reveals mechanisms for drought tolerance.对两个具有鲜明对比的鹰嘴豆基因型的叶片组织进行 RNA 测序,揭示了耐旱的机制。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Aug;129:295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
5
ABA Transport and Plant Water Stress Responses.ABA 转运与植物水分胁迫响应。
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jun;23(6):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
The RNA-Seq-based high resolution gene expression atlas of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) reveals dynamic spatio-temporal changes associated with growth and development.基于 RNA-Seq 的鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)高分辨率基因表达图谱揭示了与生长和发育相关的动态时空变化。
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Sep;41(9):2209-2225. doi: 10.1111/pce.13210. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
The Pivotal Role of Ethylene in Plant Growth.乙烯在植物生长中的关键作用。
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Apr;23(4):311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Emerging role of the plant ERF transcription factors in coordinating wound defense responses and repair.植物 ERF 转录因子在协调伤口防御反应和修复中的新兴作用。
J Cell Sci. 2018 Jan 29;131(2):jcs208215. doi: 10.1242/jcs.208215.
9
Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure.植物抗旱性取决于适时关闭气孔。
Ecol Lett. 2017 Nov;20(11):1437-1447. doi: 10.1111/ele.12851. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants.植物中的非生物胁迫信号传导与响应
Cell. 2016 Oct 6;167(2):313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029.