Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Aug;45(8):776.e1-776.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Mechanical impingement at the narrow radioulnar space of the tuberosity is believed to be an etiological factor in the injury of the distal biceps tendon. The aim of the study was to compare the pressure distribution at the proximal radioulnar space between 2 fixation techniques and the intact state.
Six right arms and 6 left arms from 5 female and 6 male frozen specimens were used for this study. A pressure transducer was introduced at the height of the radial tuberosity with the intact distal biceps tendon and after 2 fixation methods: the suture-anchor and the cortical button technique. The force (N), maximum pressure (kPa) applied to the radial tuberosity, and the contact area (mm) of the radial tuberosity with the ulna were measured and differences from the intact tendon were detected from 60° supination to 60° pronation in 15° increments with the elbow in full extension and in 45° and 90° flexion of the elbow.
With the distal biceps tendon intact, the pressures during pronation were similar regardless of extension and flexion and were the highest at 60° pronation with 90° elbow flexion (23.3 ± 53.5 kPa). After repair of the tendon, the mean peak pressure, contact area, and total force showed an increase regardless of the fixation technique. Highest peak pressures were found using the cortical button technique at 45° flexion of the elbow and 60° pronation. These differences were significantly different from the intact tendon. The contact area was significantly larger in full extension and 15°, 30°, and 60° pronation using the cortical button technique.
Pressures on the distal biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity increase during pronation, especially after repair of the tendon.
Mechanical impingement could play a role in both the etiology of primary distal biceps tendon ruptures and the complications occurring after fixation of the tendon using certain techniques.
人们认为在桡骨结节的狭窄桡尺空间发生的机械撞击是导致远端肱二头肌肌腱损伤的一个病因。本研究的目的是比较两种固定技术和完整状态下近端桡尺空间的压力分布。
本研究使用了 5 名女性和 6 名男性冷冻标本的 6 个右臂和 6 个左臂。在完整的远端肱二头肌腱和两种固定方法(缝线锚钉和皮质纽扣技术)之后,将压力传感器引入桡骨结节的高度。测量施加在桡骨结节上的力(N)、最大压力(kPa)和桡骨结节与尺骨的接触面积(mm),并从 60°旋前到 60°旋后,以 15°的增量检测从完全伸展的肘部到 45°和 90°弯曲的肘部时与完整肌腱的差异。
在远端肱二头肌腱完整的情况下,无论伸展还是弯曲,在旋前时的压力相似,在 90°弯曲的肘部的 60°旋前时最高(23.3±53.5kPa)。在修复肌腱后,无论固定技术如何,平均峰值压力、接触面积和总力均显示出增加。在肘部 45°弯曲和 60°旋前时,使用皮质纽扣技术时峰值压力最高。这些差异与完整的肌腱明显不同。在完全伸展和 15°、30°和 60°旋前时,使用皮质纽扣技术时接触面积明显更大。
在旋前时,桡骨结节处的远端肱二头肌腱上的压力增加,尤其是在修复肌腱后。
机械撞击可能在原发性远端肱二头肌腱断裂的病因和使用某些技术固定肌腱后出现的并发症中都发挥作用。