Department of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Department of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e030883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030883.
To qualitatively analyse different types of dissemination of information during monthly group calls between researchers, providers and clinical staff used to establish best practices for implementing an asthma shared decision-making (SDM) intervention. Evaluating dissemination of information can provide a better understanding of how best practices are shared, informing implementation approaches to improve the uptake of new evidence and overcome barriers.
10 primary care practices in North Carolina.
Providers and clinical staff participated in monthly group phone calls with researchers to share best practices during implementation of a SDM intervention for asthma patients.
The research team transcribed and coded statements using content analysis into three different knowledge types: Knowledge Position, Knowledge Form and Knowledge Object. Knowledge Objects were further classified using directed content analysis where the research team interpreted the content objects through a classification process of identifying themes or patterns to describe three different types of dissemination of information: (A) Confirmation of Existing Knowledge, (B) Generation of New Knowledge and (C) Spreading of New Knowledge.
Across the 8 transcripts, 4 Knowledge Positions, 7 Knowledge Forms and 18 types of Knowledge Objects were identified. From the Knowledge Objects, Confirmation of Existing Knowledge occurred during the training of participating practices. The review also identified Generation of New Knowledge by providers and clinical staff raised in these calls. This Generation of New Knowledge was later documented being used by other practices with the identification of Spreading of New Knowledge.
The research team described the types of dissemination of information that occurred between researchers, providers and clinical staff during implementation of an asthma SDM intervention. Both Confirmation of Existing Knowledge and Generation of New Knowledge in response to barriers occurred. These exploratory dissemination of information results provide additional mechanisms for evaluating implementation science.
NCT02047929; Post-results.
定性分析研究人员、提供者和临床工作人员每月进行的小组电话会议中信息传播的不同类型,这些会议用于为实施哮喘共享决策(SDM)干预措施建立最佳实践。评估信息传播可以更好地了解最佳实践是如何共享的,为实施方法提供信息,以提高新证据的采用率并克服障碍。
北卡罗来纳州的 10 个初级保健实践点。
提供者和临床工作人员参加了每月一次的小组电话会议,与研究人员分享在为哮喘患者实施 SDM 干预措施时的最佳实践。
研究团队使用内容分析法将陈述转录并编码为三种不同的知识类型:知识立场、知识形式和知识对象。知识对象进一步使用定向内容分析法进行分类,研究团队通过识别主题或模式的分类过程来解释内容对象,以描述三种不同类型的信息传播:(A)现有知识的确认,(B)新知识的生成和(C)新知识的传播。
在 8 个转录本中,确定了 4 个知识立场、7 个知识形式和 18 种知识对象。从知识对象来看,参与实践的培训过程中发生了现有知识的确认。研究还发现,提供者和临床工作人员在这些电话会议中提出了新知识的生成。这种新知识的生成后来被其他实践所采用,并确定了新知识的传播。
研究团队描述了在实施哮喘 SDM 干预措施期间研究人员、提供者和临床工作人员之间信息传播的类型。在应对障碍时,既发生了现有知识的确认,也发生了新知识的生成。这些探索性信息传播结果为评估实施科学提供了额外的机制。
NCT02047929;事后注册。