Alboni P, Paparella N, Cappato R, Pedroni P, Candini G C, Antonioli G E
Divisione Cardiologica, Arcispedale S. Anna, Ferrara.
G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Jun;18(6):441-8.
The purpose of this study was to find out whether transesophageal pacing could be utilized for assessment of sinus node function, besides Wenckebach point, in patients with sick sinus syndrome. In 17 patients with sino-atrial disease (group I) we compared the results of sinus node tests obtained both in the basal state and after pharmacological autonomic blockade by endocavitary stimulation and 24 hours later, by transesophageal pacing. In another group of 17 patients with sino-atrial disease (control group) we compared the results obtained from two endocavitary studies. In group I, sinus cycle length and corrected sinus recovery time did not show significant differences between the two studies either the basal state or after autonomic blockade, whereas sino-atrial conduction time was more prolonged during esophageal pacing (P less than 0.01). In the control group, sinus node measures did not show significant differences between the two studies. In group I, the following coefficients of correlation were obtained: A) in the basal state sinus cycle length, r = 0.65, corrected sinus recovery time, r = 0.57, sinoatrial conduction time, r = 0.52; B) after autonomic blockade sinus cycle length, r = 0.95, corrected sinus recovery time, r = 0.62 and sino-atrial conduction time, r = 0.53. In the basal state, the correlation for sinus cycle length and corrected sinus recovery time between the two studies was lower in the "study group" than in the "control group" (P less than 0.05). However, after autonomic blockade the correlation for sinus node measures did not show any significant differences between the two groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是探究在病态窦房结综合征患者中,除了文氏点之外,经食管起搏是否可用于评估窦房结功能。在17例窦房疾病患者(第一组)中,我们比较了在基础状态下以及经腔内刺激进行药理学自主神经阻滞之后和24小时后经食管起搏所获得的窦房结测试结果。在另一组17例窦房疾病患者(对照组)中,我们比较了两次经腔内研究的结果。在第一组中,无论是基础状态还是自主神经阻滞后,两项研究之间的窦性周期长度和校正的窦房结恢复时间均无显著差异,而食管起搏期间窦房传导时间延长更明显(P<0.01)。在对照组中,两项研究之间的窦房结测量值无显著差异。在第一组中,获得了以下相关系数:A)基础状态下,窦性周期长度r = 0.65,校正的窦房结恢复时间r = 0.57,窦房传导时间r = 0.52;B)自主神经阻滞后,窦性周期长度r = 0.95,校正的窦房结恢复时间r = 0.62,窦房传导时间r = 0.53。在基础状态下,“研究组”两项研究之间窦性周期长度和校正的窦房结恢复时间的相关性低于“对照组”(P<0.05)。然而,自主神经阻滞后,两组患者窦房结测量值的相关性无显著差异。(摘要截短至250字)