Le Heuzey J Y, Khaznadar G, Guize L, Carcone P, Weissenburger J, Lavergne T, Ourbak P, Valty J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1987 Jan;80(1):28-35.
Transoesophageal pacing is mainly used for treatment of supraventricular tachycardias and assessment of refractory periods of accessory pathways. It has been proposed for the study of sinus node function and A-V nodal conduction. The aim of this study was to know if transoesophageal pacing could modify the vago-sympathetic tone, therefore the results of the tests, knowing it can be discomfortable and that endodigestive procedures can induce vagal responses. Furthermore, the stimulation is elicited near the left atrium, and not in the right atrium as during endocavitary tests. We have compared in 20 patients (age 68 +/- 12) the results obtained by both endocavitary and transoesophageal pacing (tension 21.2 +/- 4.5 V, duration 16 msec, interelectrode spacing 30 mm). We measured sino-atrial conduction time (SACT), sinus node recovery time (SNRT), Wenckebach's point and nodal refractory periods. After introduction of the oesophageal lead we observed a significant (p less than 0.01) but slight and transitory tachycardia. The results of A-V nodal conduction parameters were not significantly different and were significantly correlated (r = 0.94 for Wenckebach's point and effective refractory period). For the sinus node function, there was no significant difference between the parameters if the oesophago-atrial delay (mean 104.4 +/- 25.9 msec) is taken into account. The correlation is poor for sino-atrial conduction time (corrected SACT, r = 0.55), tighter for sinus node recovery time (maximal corrected SNRT, r = 0.92).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
经食管起搏主要用于治疗室上性心动过速和评估旁路的不应期。它已被用于窦房结功能和房室结传导的研究。本研究的目的是了解经食管起搏是否会改变迷走-交感神经张力,从而影响检查结果,因为经食管起搏可能会让人不适,且消化内镜操作可诱发迷走神经反应。此外,刺激是在左心房附近引发,而不像心腔内检查那样在右心房。我们比较了20例患者(年龄68±12岁)的心腔内起搏和经食管起搏的结果(电压21.2±4.5V,脉宽16毫秒,电极间距30毫米)。我们测量了窦房传导时间(SACT)、窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)、文氏点和房室结不应期。插入食管电极后,我们观察到显著(p<0.01)但轻微且短暂的心动过速。房室结传导参数的结果无显著差异,且显著相关(文氏点与有效不应期的r = 0.94)。对于窦房结功能,如果考虑食管-心房延迟(平均104.4±25.9毫秒),各参数之间无显著差异。窦房传导时间的相关性较差(校正SACT,r = 0.55),窦房结恢复时间的相关性较强(最大校正SNRT,r = 0.92)。(摘要截短于250字)