Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Colorectal and General Surgery, Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, Italy.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1235-1241. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16384. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
To evaluate long-term survival and institutionalization in onco-geriatric surgical patients, and to analyze the association between these outcomes and a preoperative risk score.
Prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.
International and multicenter locations.
Patients aged 70 years or older undergoing elective surgery for a malignant solid tumor at five centers (n = 229).
We assessed long-term survival and institutionalization using the Preoperative Risk Estimation for Onco-geriatric Patients (PREOP) score, developed to predict the 30-day risk of major complications. The PREOP score collected data about sex, type of surgery, and the American Society for Anesthesiologists classification, as well as the Timed Up & Go test and the Nutritional Risk Screening results. An overall score higher than 8 was considered abnormal.
We included 149 women and 80 men (median age = 76 y; interquartile range = 8). Survival at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively was 84%, 77%, and 56%, respectively. Moreover, survival at 1 year was worse for patients with a PREOP risk score higher than 8 (70%) compared with 8 or lower (91%). Of those alive at 1 year, 43 (26%) were institutionalized, and by 2 years, almost half of the entire cohort (46%) were institutionalized or had died. A PREOP risk score higher than 8 was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-4.0), irrespective of stage and age, but not with being institutionalized (odds ratios = 1 y, 1.6 [95% CI = .7-3.8]; 2 y, 2.2 [95% CI = .9-5.5]).
A high PREOP score is associated with mortality but not with remaining independent. Despite acceptable survival rates, physical function may deteriorate after surgery. It is imperative to discuss treatment goals and expectations preoperatively to determine if they are feasible. Using the PREOP risk score can provide an objective measure on which to base decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1235-1241, 2020.
评估老年肿瘤外科患者的长期生存和住院情况,并分析这些结果与术前风险评分之间的关系。
前瞻性队列研究,长期随访。
国际多中心。
5 个中心 70 岁或以上择期接受恶性实体肿瘤手术的患者(n = 229)。
我们使用术前老年肿瘤患者风险评估(PREOP)评分评估长期生存和住院情况,该评分旨在预测 30 天内发生主要并发症的风险。PREOP 评分收集了性别、手术类型和美国麻醉医师协会分类、计时起立行走测试和营养风险筛查结果的数据。总分高于 8 被认为异常。
共纳入 149 名女性和 80 名男性(中位年龄 = 76 岁;四分位距 = 8)。术后 1、2 和 5 年的生存率分别为 84%、77%和 56%。此外,PREOP 风险评分高于 8 分的患者 1 年生存率(70%)较评分 8 分或更低的患者(91%)差。在存活 1 年的患者中,43 人(26%)住院,2 年内,整个队列的近一半(46%)住院或死亡。无论分期和年龄如何,PREOP 风险评分高于 8 分与死亡率增加相关(风险比 = 2.6;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.7-4.0),但与住院无关(比值比 1 年,1.6 [95% CI =.7-3.8];2 年,2.2 [95% CI =.9-5.5])。
高 PREOP 评分与死亡率相关,但与独立无关。尽管生存率尚可,但术后身体功能可能恶化。术前必须讨论治疗目标和预期,以确定是否可行。使用 PREOP 风险评分可以提供客观的衡量标准来做出决策。美国老年医学会 68:1235-1241,2020。