Vernieri Claudio, Prisciandaro Michele, Nichetti Federico, Lobefaro Riccardo, Peverelli Giorgia, Ligorio Francesca, Zattarin Emma, Cona Maria Silvia, Sepe Pierangela, Corti Francesca, Manglaviti Sara, Brambilla Marta, Re Barbara, Belfiore Antonino, Pruneri Giancarlo, Celio Luigi, Mariani Gabriella, Bianchi Giulia Valeria, Rivoltini Licia, Capri Giuseppe, de Braud Filippo
Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare (IFOM), Via Adamello 16, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 6;12(3):617. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030617.
: Single-agent capecitabine (C) is a moderately effective chemotherapeutic compound in the treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The capecitabine-vinorelbine (CV) combination is also used due to a good tolerability profile, but no studies have demonstrated its superiority over single-agent C. : We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HER2-negative mBC treated with CV vs. single-agent C. Out of 290 patients included in this study, 127 (43.8%) received single-agent C, while 163 (56.2%) patients were treated with CV. Median PFS was similar in patients treated with single-agent C or CV, while CV was associated with significantly longer OS in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. This OS advantage was confirmed at multivariable analysis also after propensity score-based matching of patients according to relevant clinical or tumor characteristics. When compared with single-agent C, CV was associated with higher incidence of G3/G4 and any-grade nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and increased transaminases. : While prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings, the potential OS advantage of CV over single-agent C in HR+ mBC patients must be weighed against a significantly higher incidence of AEs.
单药卡培他滨(C)是治疗人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者的一种中等疗效的化疗药物。卡培他滨与长春瑞滨(CV)联合使用也是因为其耐受性良好,但尚无研究证明其优于单药C。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以比较接受CV与单药C治疗的HER2阴性mBC患者的总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AE)发生率。在本研究纳入的290例患者中,127例(43.8%)接受单药C治疗,而163例(56.2%)患者接受CV治疗。单药C或CV治疗的患者中位PFS相似,而CV与激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌患者显著更长的OS相关。在根据相关临床或肿瘤特征对患者进行倾向评分匹配后的多变量分析中,这种OS优势也得到了证实。与单药C相比,CV与3/4级及任何级别的恶心/呕吐、腹泻和转氨酶升高的发生率更高相关。虽然需要前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现,但CV相对于单药C在HR+ mBC患者中的潜在OS优势必须与显著更高的AE发生率相权衡。