Suppr超能文献

RIGHT Choice 研究的最终结果:在激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性、临床侵袭性强的绝经前晚期乳腺癌患者中,瑞博西利联合内分泌治疗对比联合化疗的疗效。

Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.

机构信息

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;42(23):2812-2821. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00144. Epub 2024 May 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg once daily; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator's choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among 222 patients randomly assigned to ribociclib plus ET (n = 112) or combination CT (n = 110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator's judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic nonvisceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. The median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; [95% CI, 17.4 to 26.7]) and 12.8 months (combination CT; [95% CI, 10.1 to 18.4); hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87]; = .003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06]). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm.

CONCLUSION

First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC.

摘要

目的

在临床上侵袭性较强的激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HR+/HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者中,从未报告过细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4/6 抑制剂联合内分泌治疗(ET)与联合化疗(CT)之间疗效的头对头比较。

方法

在这项开放标签、多中心、随机 2 期试验中,临床上侵袭性较强的 HR+/HER2-ABC 的绝经前/围绝经期女性被随机分配至一线治疗组(1:1),接受来曲唑/阿那曲唑联合戈舍瑞林或研究者选择的联合 CT(多西他赛联合卡培他滨、紫杉醇联合吉西他滨或卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨),加用或不加用ribociclib(600mg 每日 1 次,连用 3 周,停药 1 周)。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

在随机分配至 ribociclib+ET 组(n=112)或联合 CT 组(n=110)的 222 例患者中,150 例(67.6%)有症状的内脏转移,41 例(18.5%)根据研究者的判断疾病进展迅速,31 例(14.0%)有症状的非内脏疾病。总体而言,106 例(47.7%)患者有研究者评估的内脏危象。中位随访时间为 37.0 个月。数据截止时,31.3%(ribociclib 组)和 15.5%(CT 组)的患者完成了研究治疗并过渡到试验后治疗。中位 PFS 为 21.8 个月(ribociclib+ET;[95%CI,17.4 至 26.7])和 12.8 个月(联合 CT;[95%CI,10.1 至 18.4]);风险比为 0.61([95%CI,0.43 至 0.87]);=0.003。在 ribociclib 组与 CT 组中,分别观察到 66.1%和 49.0%的患者获得了总体缓解率,中位缓解时间分别为 61.8 个月和 3.2 个月(风险比,0.76[95%CI,0.55 至 1.06])。与 CT 组相比,ribociclib 组中观察到的症状性不良事件发生率较低。

结论

在临床上侵袭性较强的 HR+/HER2-ABC 患者中,一线 ribociclib+ET 与联合 CT 相比,具有显著的 PFS 获益、相似的缓解率和更好的耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a3/11315404/89f96962ff21/jco-42-2812-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验