Center for Viticulture & Enology, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, 100083 Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Viticulture and Enology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 100083 Beijing, China; Institute for Horticultural Plants, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, 100083 Beijing, China; Grupo de Investigación en Polifenoles, Unidad de Nutrición y Bromatología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Center for Viticulture & Enology, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, 100083 Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Viticulture and Enology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 100083 Beijing, China.
Food Res Int. 2020 Apr;130:108885. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108885. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
Limited oxygenation and over-oxidation experiments were designed to compare the phenolic and chromatic characters of base wines Cabernet Franc (CF), Cabernet Sauvignon (CS), and their counterparts that blended with modifier wines Marselan (MA) and Petit Verdot (PV). In both limited oxygenation and over-oxidation conditions, all blend wines generally contained higher C*, a* and Red%, and lower h, b* and Yellow% than their base wine counterparts, because MA contributed flavonols (copigments) and anthocyanins, and PV contributed flavanols (anthocyanin derived pigments precursors). Chromatic changes that can be perceived by human eye (ΔE*) in CF based blend wines were more obvious than that of CS based blend wines, which indicate that base wine with lower phenolic concentrations and weak phenolic profiles (CF) might be more prone to be chromatically modified than base wine with higher phenolic concentrations and distinct phenolic profiles (CS). Chemical influences of different blending strategies on anthocyanin derivatives' formations were depending on phenolic profiles of the modifier wines and base wines, and also on the oxygen exposure. The results suggest that the chromatic improvement of base wines could be realized by blending modifier wines under different oxygen exposures.
本研究设计了微氧和过氧实验,以比较品丽珠(CF)、赤霞珠(CS)基酒及其与美乐(MA)和小维多(PV)调配酒的酚类和色度特征。在微氧和过氧条件下,所有调配酒的 C*、a和 Red%普遍高于基酒,h、b和 Yellow%则低于基酒,因为 MA 贡献了类黄酮(协同色素)和花青素,PV 则贡献了黄烷醇(花青素衍生色素前体)。人眼可感知的色度变化(ΔE*)在 CF 基调配酒中比 CS 基调配酒更明显,这表明低酚浓度和弱酚类特征的基酒(CF)比高酚浓度和鲜明酚类特征的基酒(CS)更容易发生颜色变化。不同调配策略对花色苷衍生物形成的化学影响取决于修饰酒和基酒的酚类特征,以及氧气暴露情况。结果表明,通过在不同氧气暴露下调配修饰酒,可以改善基酒的色度。