• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一个复杂的综合跨部门心理肿瘤护理项目(isPO):一项混合方法研究方案。

Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol.

机构信息

IMVR - Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e034141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034141.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034141
PMID:32156765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7064131/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

International standards of care require the complete integration of psycho-oncological care into biomedical cancer treatment. The structured integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological programme 'isPO' is aiming to ensure a provision of care in inpatient and outpatient settings according to a stepped-care approach. Up to now, psycho-oncological care is missing regulated and standardised processes to demonstrate the effectiveness. This study protocol describes the process and outcome evaluation that is conducted, along with the isPO study. The programme evaluation is aiming to proof effectiveness, explain potential discrepancies between expected and observed outcomes. Additionally, provide insight into the implementation process, as well as contextual factors that might promote or inhibit the dissemination and implementation of the stepped care programme will be gained. In addition to these measures, a cost-consequence analysis will provide further evidence aimed at integrating psycho-oncological care into primary healthcare.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The evaluation concept is based on a tripartite strategy consisting of a prospective, formative and summative evaluation. To capture all determinants, a concurrent mixed-method design is applied comprising qualitative (interviews and focus groups) and quantitative (standardised questionnaires) surveys of patients and healthcare providers. In addition, analysis of the psycho-oncological care data (isPO care data) and statutory health insurance claims data will be conducted. Primary and secondary data will complement one another (data linkage) to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the effectiveness and implementation of the complex intervention within the isPO study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal identifiers (eg, name, date of birth) will be pseudonymised. Dissemination strategies include annual reports as well as quality workshops for the organisations, the presentation of results in publications and on conferences, and public relations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00015326; Pre-results.

摘要

简介

国际护理标准要求将心理肿瘤学护理完全纳入生物医学癌症治疗中。结构化的综合跨部门心理肿瘤学计划“isPO”旨在根据分级护理方法确保在住院和门诊环境中提供护理。到目前为止,心理肿瘤学护理缺乏经过监管和标准化的流程来证明其有效性。本研究方案描述了正在进行的过程和结果评估,以及 isPO 研究。该方案评估旨在证明有效性,解释预期结果与实际结果之间的潜在差异。此外,还将深入了解实施过程以及可能促进或抑制分级护理计划传播和实施的背景因素。除了这些措施之外,成本效益分析还将提供进一步的证据,旨在将心理肿瘤学护理纳入初级保健。

方法和分析

评估概念基于由前瞻性、形成性和总结性评估组成的三部分策略。为了捕获所有决定因素,应用了同时进行的混合方法设计,包括对患者和医疗保健提供者进行定性(访谈和焦点小组)和定量(标准化问卷)调查。此外,还将对心理肿瘤学护理数据(isPO 护理数据)和法定健康保险索赔数据进行分析。主要和次要数据将相互补充(数据链接),以更全面地了解 isPO 研究中复杂干预的有效性和实施情况。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得科隆大学医学院伦理委员会的批准。对于所有收集的数据,将考虑相关的国家和欧洲数据保护法规。所有个人标识符(例如,姓名、出生日期)将被匿名化。传播策略包括年度报告以及为组织提供的质量研讨会、在出版物和会议上展示结果以及公共关系。

注册号

DRKS00015326;预结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol.评价一个复杂的综合跨部门心理肿瘤护理项目(isPO):一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e034141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034141.
2
Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.整合跨领域的心理肿瘤学(isPO):德国为新诊断癌症患者提供的一种新的护理形式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0.
3
Conducting a prospective evaluation of the development of a complex psycho-oncological care programme (isPO) in Germany.对德国复杂心理肿瘤护理项目(isPO)发展进行前瞻性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07951-1.
4
Patients' perspectives on the quality of care of a new complex psycho-oncological care programme in Germany - external mixed methods evaluation results.患者对德国新的复杂心理肿瘤护理计划的护理质量的看法 - 外部混合方法评估结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 15;23(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09714-y.
5
Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service.将一对一的同伴支持融入德国的心理肿瘤学护理中:对 isPO onco-guide 服务的多视角、混合方法评估。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10399-10422. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
6
The impact of COVID-19 on the interpretation of psycho-oncological support trial results: a quasi-experimental approach using the data from the new form of care "Integrated cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (nFC-isPO)".COVID-19 对心理肿瘤学支持试验结果解读的影响:采用“跨部门整合心理肿瘤学(nFC-isPO)”新护理形式数据的准实验方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 30;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09544-y.
7
Study protocol of the BLANKET trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial on the (cost-) effectiveness of a primary care intervention for fear of cancer recurrence in cancer survivors.BLANKET 试验方案:一项关于初级保健干预措施对癌症幸存者癌症复发恐惧的(成本)有效性的集群随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 2;9(12):e032616. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032616.
8
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique.制定德国跨部门心理肿瘤学质量指标:结合 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和德尔菲技术。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3.
9
Does the mode of care delivery affect therapeutic alliance, patient care satisfaction or patient reported outcomes? Psycho-oncological care evaluation data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间收集的心理肿瘤学护理评估数据显示,护理提供模式是否会影响治疗联盟、患者护理满意度或患者报告的结果?
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2024;42(5):653-673. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2024.2318224. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
10
Characteristics of value-based health and social care from organisations' perspectives (OrgValue): a mixed-methods study protocol.从组织视角看基于价值的健康与社会照护的特征(组织价值):一项混合方法研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 27;8(4):e022635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022635.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors.癌症患者的连贯感——心理肿瘤学咨询与治疗联盟作为健康促进因素。
Health Psychol Rep. 2024 Oct 7;12(4):322-336. doi: 10.5114/hpr/189462. eCollection 2024.
2
Patients' perspectives on the quality of care of a new complex psycho-oncological care programme in Germany - external mixed methods evaluation results.患者对德国新的复杂心理肿瘤护理计划的护理质量的看法 - 外部混合方法评估结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 15;23(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09714-y.
3
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique.制定德国跨部门心理肿瘤学质量指标:结合 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和德尔菲技术。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3.
4
Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service.将一对一的同伴支持融入德国的心理肿瘤学护理中:对 isPO onco-guide 服务的多视角、混合方法评估。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10399-10422. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
The impact of COVID-19 on the interpretation of psycho-oncological support trial results: a quasi-experimental approach using the data from the new form of care "Integrated cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (nFC-isPO)".COVID-19 对心理肿瘤学支持试验结果解读的影响:采用“跨部门整合心理肿瘤学(nFC-isPO)”新护理形式数据的准实验方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 30;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09544-y.
6
Cancer patients' experiences and preferences when receiving bad news: a qualitative study.癌症患者在接收坏消息时的体验和偏好:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3859-3870. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04311-8. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Examination of Provider and Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Preferences in Integrative Oncology at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.在一家美国国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心对综合肿瘤学中医疗服务提供者与患者的知识、信念及偏好进行的调查。
Integr Med Rep. 2022 Jun 24;1(1):66-75. doi: 10.1089/imr.2021.0004. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Positive Mental Health (PMH) scale using item response theory.采用项目反应理论对积极心理健康(PMH)量表进行心理计量学评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04162-0.
9
Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.整合跨领域的心理肿瘤学(isPO):德国为新诊断癌症患者提供的一种新的护理形式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0.
10
Conducting a prospective evaluation of the development of a complex psycho-oncological care programme (isPO) in Germany.对德国复杂心理肿瘤护理项目(isPO)发展进行前瞻性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07951-1.

本文引用的文献

1
New challenges in psycho-oncology: Economic evaluation of psychosocial services in cancer: Challenges and best practice recommendations.心理肿瘤学的新挑战:癌症心理社会服务的经济评估:挑战与最佳实践建议
Psychooncology. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.4933. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.癌症社会学:十年研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Mar;40(3):552-576. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12662. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
The regression discontinuity design showed to be a valid alternative to a randomized controlled trial for estimating treatment effects.回归不连续设计被证明是一种有效的替代随机对照试验的方法,可用于估计治疗效果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
4
Integrating evidence-based practices for increasing cancer screenings in safety net health systems: a multiple case study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.整合基于证据的实践以增加安全网医疗系统中的癌症筛查:一项使用实施研究综合框架的多案例研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 2;11:109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0477-4.
5
[Multilevel Analysis in Health Services Research in Healthcare Organizations: Benefits, Requirements and Implementation].[医疗保健机构中卫生服务研究的多层次分析:益处、要求与实施]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Mar;79(3):203-209. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-102882. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Regression discontinuity designs in healthcare research.医疗保健研究中的回归断点设计。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 14;352:i1216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1216.
7
Integrating Psychosocial Care Into Routine Cancer Care.将心理社会护理纳入常规癌症护理。
Cancer Control. 2015 Oct;22(4):442-9. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200410.
8
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
9
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
[Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].[二次数据分析的良好实践(GPS):指南与建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396815. Epub 2015 Jan 26.