• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吸治疗师的气管插管实践。

Respiratory Therapist Endotracheal Intubation Practices.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Division of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2020 Jul;65(7):954-960. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07338. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.07338
PMID:32156790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure performed by respiratory therapists (RTs). The purpose of this study was to describe current RT intubation practices in North Carolina through the use of a survey instrument.

METHODS

A survey was developed by the authors using REDCap. The survey was sent via email to all licensed RTs in North Carolina. Information collected included respondent demographics, intubation practices (including training and skill maintenance), and attitudes about RT intubation practices.

RESULTS

Of the 411 respondents, 68% intubated at their facility, representing 81 unique institutions. RTs who performed intubation were more likely to be from community hospitals and less likely to be from level 1 trauma centers. Respondents reported intubating adult (91%), pediatric (61%), and neonatal (65%) patients. The most common areas in which RTs reported performing intubation were the adult ICU (80%), emergency department (76%), outside the operating room for emergencies (76%), neonatal ICU (43%), the delivery room (45%), and pediatric ICU (25%). The median (interquartile range) number of supervised intubations required to be considered competent was 5 (3-5). The most common numbers of intubations required to be considered competent were 5 (32%), 3 (26%), 10 (16%), 2 (4%), and 0 (3%). The perceived number of intubations to achieve competence was 6 (range 5-10) and did not differ based on years of experience. Most respondents believed their RT intubation program was safe (93%) and effective (91%), and that RTs were well-trained (81%), that their intubation skills were objectively evaluated (66%), and that RTs receive sufficient feedback on performance (68%).

CONCLUSIONS

RTs in North Carolina frequently performed intubation and had high confidence in their programs. Further studies are needed to establish standardized training for endotracheal intubation, document success rates for intubations, and evaluate the use of video laryngoscopy by RTs.

摘要

背景

气管插管是呼吸治疗师(RT)进行的常见程序。本研究的目的是通过使用调查工具描述北卡罗来纳州目前的 RT 插管实践。

方法

作者使用 REDCap 开发了一项调查。该调查通过电子邮件发送给北卡罗来纳州的所有持照 RT。收集的信息包括受访者的人口统计学信息、插管实践(包括培训和技能维持)以及对 RT 插管实践的态度。

结果

在 411 名受访者中,68%在其所在机构进行插管,代表 81 个独特的机构。进行插管的 RT 更有可能来自社区医院,而不太可能来自 1 级创伤中心。受访者报告说,他们插管的患者包括成人(91%)、儿科(61%)和新生儿(65%)。RT 报告说,他们最常进行插管的领域是成人 ICU(80%)、急诊部(76%)、手术室外紧急情况(76%)、新生儿 ICU(43%)、产房(45%)和儿科 ICU(25%)。认为有能力进行插管的受访者中位数(四分位距)需要接受 5(3-5)次监督插管。认为有能力进行插管的最常见次数为 5(32%)、3(26%)、10(16%)、2(4%)和 0(3%)。认为达到能力所需的插管次数为 6(5-10),与工作年限无关。大多数受访者认为他们的 RT 插管计划是安全有效的(93%和 91%),并且 RT 接受了良好的培训(81%)、他们的插管技能得到了客观评估(66%)并且他们的表现得到了足够的反馈(68%)。

结论

北卡罗来纳州的 RT 经常进行插管,并且对他们的计划充满信心。需要进一步的研究来建立标准化的气管插管培训、记录插管成功率以及评估 RT 使用视频喉镜。

相似文献

1
Respiratory Therapist Endotracheal Intubation Practices.呼吸治疗师的气管插管实践。
Respir Care. 2020 Jul;65(7):954-960. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07338. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
2
Endotracheal Intubation Training and Skill Maintenance for Respiratory Therapists.呼吸治疗师的气管插管培训与技能维持
Respir Care. 2017 Feb;62(2):156-162. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05037. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Respiratory Therapist Intubation Practice in Pediatric ICUs: A Multicenter Registry Study.儿科 ICU 呼吸治疗师插管实践:一项多中心登记研究。
Respir Care. 2020 Oct;65(10):1534-1540. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07667. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Feasibility of a Multi-Center Respiratory Therapist Endotracheal Intubation Study.多中心呼吸治疗师经气管插管研究的可行性。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1031-1040. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10682. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
Recertification of respiratory therapists' intubation skills one year after initial training: an analysis of skill retention and retraining.呼吸治疗师初次培训一年后插管技能的再认证:技能保持与再培训分析
Respir Care. 2001 Mar;46(3):234-7.
6
Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.三种视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于急诊气管插管的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e024927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024927.
7
Non-operating room emergency airway management and endotracheal intubation practices: a survey of anesthesiology program directors.非手术室紧急气道管理与气管插管实践:麻醉学项目主任的一项调查
Anesth Analg. 1997 Jul;85(1):62-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199707000-00012.
8
Failure of pediatric and neonatal trainees to meet Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program standards for neonatal intubation.儿科和新生儿培训生未能达到加拿大新生儿复苏计划新生儿插管标准。
J Perinatol. 2010 Mar;30(3):182-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.152. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
9
Development of the Defense Registry for Emergency Airway Management (DREAM).《急诊气道管理防御登记册》(DREAM)的制定。
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021 Apr-Jun(PB 8-21-04/05/06):93-97.
10
Respiratory care practitioners as secondary providers of endotracheal intubation: one hospital's experience.呼吸治疗师作为气管插管的二级提供者:一家医院的经验。
Respir Care. 1994 Jan;39(1):30-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The scholarly and practice profile of respiratory therapists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.加拿大呼吸治疗师的学术与实践概况:一项横断面调查。
Can J Respir Ther. 2024 Aug 30;60:122-139. doi: 10.29390/001c.122345. eCollection 2024.
2
Endotracheal Intubation Outside the Operating Room: Year in Review 2023.《2023 年回顾:手术室外的气管插管》。
Respir Care. 2024 Aug 24;69(9):1165-1181. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12014.
3
Comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in general anesthesia in children.小儿全身麻醉中喉罩气道与气管内导管的比较。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Oct 17;26(6):554. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12253. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Emergency Airway Management: The Turf War Is Over.紧急气道管理:地盘之争结束了。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1189-1191. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11224.
5
Barriers to Respiratory Care Research in the United States.美国呼吸治疗研究的障碍。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1112-1118. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10899. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Feasibility of a Multi-Center Respiratory Therapist Endotracheal Intubation Study.多中心呼吸治疗师经气管插管研究的可行性。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1031-1040. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10682. Epub 2023 Apr 11.