Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Physical Therapy Program, DeSales University, 2755 Station Avenue, Center Valley, PA 18034 (USA).
Physical Therapy Program, DeSales University. S.J. Carp is a Board Certified Clinical Specialist in Geriatric Physical Therapy.
Phys Ther. 2020 Jun 23;100(6):897-906. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa035.
Functional outcomes with early rehabilitation in the acute care setting have improved; however, an improved understanding of muscle fatigue using surface electromyography (sEMG) is warranted to better guide patient-centered exercise prescription.
The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and feasibility of collecting sEMG at the acute care bedside and to determine differences in muscle fatigue during isometric and dynamic submaximal contractions among patients in the hospital, healthy younger participants, and healthy older participants.
The study used an observational cohort design.
There were 37 participants. Median frequency (Fmed) of the myoelectric signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and time to task failure (TTTF) were measured using sEMG during an isometric and dynamic fatiguing contraction. Primary analysis compared TTTF between groups for both types of contractions. Secondary analysis compared Fmed at initiation and termination of fatiguing contraction.
High-quality sEMG measures were safe and feasible to collect at the acute care bedside with no adverse events. There was a statistically significant difference in TTTF between groups after isometric and dynamic contractions; hospitalized patients fatigued faster than healthy younger and healthy older participants after both contractions. With the exception of the vastus lateralis during a dynamic contraction in healthy younger and hospitalized patients, there was a statistically significant difference between Fmed at initiation and termination of contraction, indicating that subjects' muscles did truly fatigue.
A limitation of the study was the small sample size of patients who were hospitalized without matched controls.
sEMG is a lab quantitative technique that was found to be safe and feasible to assess muscle fatigue in the acute care environment. The protocol yielded similar results to previously published literature for healthy younger and healthy older people. Further research is needed to better understand how to integrate sEMG findings into patient-centered exercise prescriptions.
在急性护理环境中进行早期康复治疗后,功能结果得到了改善;然而,为了更好地指导以患者为中心的运动处方,使用表面肌电图(sEMG)来更深入地了解肌肉疲劳是必要的。
本研究旨在评估在急性护理床边采集 sEMG 的安全性和可行性,并确定住院患者、健康年轻参与者和健康老年参与者在等长和动态亚最大收缩期间肌肉疲劳的差异。
本研究采用观察性队列设计。
共纳入 37 名参与者。使用 sEMG 在等长和动态疲劳收缩期间测量股四头肌的肌电信号中位频率(Fmed)和任务失败时间(TTTF)。主要分析比较了两种收缩类型下 TTTF 在组间的差异。次要分析比较了疲劳收缩开始和结束时的 Fmed。
在急性护理床边采集高质量的 sEMG 是安全且可行的,没有不良事件发生。在等长和动态收缩后,组间 TTTF 存在统计学差异;与健康年轻和健康老年参与者相比,住院患者在两种收缩后疲劳更快。除了健康年轻和住院患者的股外侧肌在动态收缩期间外,收缩开始和结束时的 Fmed 存在统计学差异,表明受试者的肌肉确实疲劳了。
本研究的局限性在于住院患者的样本量较小,且没有匹配的对照组。
sEMG 是一种实验室定量技术,被发现可安全且可行地评估急性护理环境中的肌肉疲劳。该方案得出的结果与先前发表的健康年轻和健康老年人群的文献相似。需要进一步研究以更好地了解如何将 sEMG 结果纳入以患者为中心的运动处方。